Using a thyroid disease-free population to define the reference interval for TSH and free T4 on the Abbott Architect analyser.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid disease can be subtle in its presentation, and TSH reference intervals may be artefactually increased by including persons with subclinical thyroid disease. We have therefore used a thyroid disease-free population to determine TSH and fT4 reference intervals. DESIGN: Apparently healthy subjects were assessed by health questionnaire, drug history, clinical assessment and measurement of thyroid antibodies. PATIENTS: Healthy subjects in a community setting. MEASUREMENTS: TSH, free T4, antithyroglobulin and anti-TPO were measured on the Abbott Architect analyser. Subjects with clinical abnormalities, consumption of thyroid-active medications or with thyroid antibodies above the manufacturer-quoted reference intervals were excluded. TSH and fT4 data were log-transformed, and the central 95% was used to calculate reference intervals. We assessed whether these data were normally distributed. We compared samples spanning the reference intervals for both TSH and fT4 between different assays looking at biases. RESULTS: From a population of 1,606 subjects, 140 males (18%) and 284 females (34%) were excluded. The central population 95% for TSH was 0·43-3·28 mU/l and for fT4 10·8-16·8 pmol/l. There were no age- or sex-related differences. For both analytes, the distribution was not significantly different to a Gaussian distribution (P > 0·05). For 5 commonly used assays for TSH, the maximum difference in the upper limit of the TSH reference interval was 0·48 mU/l and for fT4 the maximum difference for the upper reference limit was 4·1 pmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of apparently healthy persons have subclinical thyroid disease. These subjects must be excluded for any thyroid hormone reference interval studies.

Visual pathway compromise after hydrocoil treatment of large ophthalmic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Hydrogel-coated coils (MicroVention, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) for endovascular aneurysm treatment offer the theoretical advantages of increased volumetric occlusion, thrombus stabilization, and improved neointimal healing. Reports of local inflammation and hydrocephalus after coiling of unruptured aneurysms have raised questions about the safety profile or appropriate usage of these new devices. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Two patients with large ophthalmic aneurysms underwent elective endovascular coiling with HydroCoils. Three to 4 weeks later, they developed profound, progressive bilateral visual loss. Magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrated extensive enhancement of the coil ball, surrounding brain parenchyma, and optic chiasm, with perianeurysmal edema. INTERVENTION: Dexamethasone produced impressive but temporary improvement in vision in one patient; the other experienced only minor improvement. One patient also developed hydrocephalus; ventriculoperitoneal shunting reduced ventricular size but had no effect on vision. Follow-up imaging demonstrated persistent enhancement of the coil ball, as well as recurrence and extension of the abnormal signal in the parenchyma and along the optic tract. CONCLUSION: Both patients have been left with no functional vision in the eye ipsilateral to the aneurysm and have experienced marked visual field loss and reduced acuity in the contralateral eye. Ongoing international studies will provide more information on the rate of inflammatory complications. The biological mechanisms underlying the phenomenon also require investigation. Meanwhile, we caution against using HydroCoils in situations in which worsened mass effect or local inflammation would have highly deleterious consequences, such as in large aneurysms adjacent to the visual pathways or the brainstem.

Reliability of a semi-automated technique of cerebral infarct volume measurement with CT.

BACKGROUND: A reliable method of infarct volume measurement is needed if infarct volume is to be used as an outcome measure in clinical stroke trials. We investigated the reproducibility of a semi-automated method of computed tomography (CT) infarct volume measurement amongst three stroke research fellows with no formal neuroradiology training and two consultant neuroradiologists. METHODS: CT brain scans for volumetric analysis were performed at 5 to 7 days in 34 patients with acute ischaemic stroke, of which 28 scans showed visible recent infarction. Five observers independently traced the infarct boundary on digitised images with a cursor. Volumetric analysis incorporated pixel thresholding with preset Hounsfield thresholds. One of the observers repeated the analyses on 21 of the scans in order to assess intraobserver variation. RESULTS: Median infarct volume was 35.7 cm3 (range 0.2-318 cm3). The closest limits of observed agreement (mean +/- 1.96 SD) between pairs of observers were between a research fellow and neuroradiologist (-29 to 21 cm3). The widest limits of agreement were between a different research fellow and the same neuroradiologist (-39.1 to 41.4 cm3). The limits of agreement between infarct volumes measured on two separate occasions by one of the research fellows were -7 to 8 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: Intraobserver reliability of CT infarct volume measurements performed by a stroke research fellow was superior to interobserver reliability between any pair of observers. The wide limits of agreement between different observers using manual tracing may not be acceptable in multicentre trials of acute ischaemic stroke treatment, but volume measurement by a single observer appears to be more reliable.

Abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging seen acutely following mild traumatic brain injury: correlation with neuropsychological tests and delayed recovery.

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is a common reason for hospital attendance and is associated with significant delayed morbidity. We studied a series of 80 persons with MTBI. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological testing were used in the acute phase and a questionnaire for post-concussion syndrome (PCS) and return to work status at 6 months. In 26 subjects abnormalities were seen on MRI, of which 5 were definitely traumatic. There was weak correlation with abnormal neuropsychological tests for attention in the acute period. There was no significant correlation with a questionnaire for PCS and return to work status. Although non-specific abnormalities are frequently seen, standard MRI techniques are not helpful in identifying patients with MTBI who are likely to have delayed recovery.