[Antenatal palliative plan following diagnosis of fetal lethal condition: Rennes Teaching Hospital experience]. / Projet palliatif anténatal après diagnostic de malformation fœtale létale : expérience du CHU de Rennes de 2006 à 2012.

OBJECTIVES: To study the pregnancies followed at Rennes University Hospital from 2006 to 2012, after prenatal diagnosis of lethal fetal condition and prenatal project of palliative care at birth consisting of comfort care emphasizing parent-child encounters and bonding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 20 pregnancies with diagnosis of lethal fetal condition where parents accepted antenatally the proposal or sought for palliative care at birth. RESULTS: Diagnosis was made at a median age of 20 weeks gestation (12-33). Birth occurred at 37.4 WG, 6 caesarean sections were performed for maternal conditions. Six cases of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) share common characteristics: good Apgar score, prolonged survival (26hours to 159days) transfer to neonatology ward (6) or later at home (4). In four multiple pregnancies, the choice of SP mainly contributed to protect healthy twins during pregnancy. In birth room, there was no need for invasive procedure or drugs. Death: one occurred during labor, 8 in birth room before H2, others in neonatal ward before d4 (excluding HLHS). CONCLUSION: These data will enable better antenatal preparation of both teams and parents. Lifetime, however short, allowed parents to meet with their child alive this permitting collection of memory traces and bonding.

[Termination of pregnancy without feticide: A French national survey]. / L'interruption médicale de grossesse sans fœticide : une enquête nationale.

PURPOSE: Termination of pregnancy without feticide (TOPWF) is poorly known in France and far less practiced than palliative care after term birth of a child having a lethal pathology. Few teams consider it and its practice remains confidential. This survey tries to describe it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A national survey was realized in 2014 using a questionnaire sent to 50 centers of prenatal diagnosis depending on a perinatal diagnosis center in France. RESULTS: Thirty-one centers answered the questionnaire. Seven teams shared their experience of TOPWF after 22-24 weeks gestation (WG). This practice concerned fetuses affected by "lethal" pathologies. The absence of feticide followed a parental request or a proposal of the medical team, after individual discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting. All the children born alive after TOPWF benefited of palliative care. The 24 other centers having answered our investigation performed systematically the feticide beyond 22-24 WG. They so wished "to protect" the fetus, the parents and the nursing team. A majority of these teams faced parental demands of abstention of feticide but few of them answered it favorably. CONCLUSION: A robust "palliative culture" seems essential to allow the nursing team to consider the development of TOPWF.

[Information in perinatal medicine: ethical aspects]. / L'information dans le contexte du soin périnatal: aspects éthiques.

Besides the undeniable need to respect parental autonomy, providing information is a legal and moral obligation, to be informed a basic right. The act of informing should be considered as an exchange and necessarily begins by listening to the other. According to the jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation that draws on Article 35 of the Deontological Code, information has to be clear (implying an educational effort, availability and to check that the information has been well understood), appropriate (adapted to each situation and person) and honest (which supposes a moral contract between parents and physicians). Loyalty implies a consideration of the uncertainty underlying medical practice, and of the limitations in arriving at a prognosis. Indeed, caution needs to be exercised in conveying information, taking into account the risk of its becoming self-fulfilling, which could modify the way in which parents take care of their child. The information given has to be coherent, both within the spatial dimension (coherence of information between the different maternity services in the perinatal network) and the temporal dimension (coherence of information between pre- and postnatal stages). It must be acknowledged that information is essentially subjective. There is a fundamental difference between coherence and uniformity, and as regards information, uniformity is neither possible nor desirable. In each situation, priority must be given to oral information delivered in an appropriate material context. The principle of establishing, in the medical file, a written trace of the information given at various stages is one way to guarantee its coherence.