Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix.

INTRODUCTION: When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87-3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section.

Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mL or 60mL: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: One of the methods used to induce labour is the placement of a transcervical Foley catheter (FC). The aim of this randomized controlled study was to assess in term pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix, whether there is a difference in efficacy between the two most commonly used insufflation volumes of FC (30mL and 60mL). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Women were randomized to induction of labour with a Foley catheter filled with 30mL or with 60mL. Primary outcome was delivery within eight hours after amniotomy. Secondary outcomes included the time interval between placement of the Foley and amniotomy, the mode of delivery, complications and neonatal outcomes. In total, 174 women (87 in each arm) were randomized. The number of deliveries within eight hours after amniotomy was not significantly different between the two groups (40.7% versus 48.83%, OR=0.71(CI; 0.39-1.3)). Sub-analysis showed that more multiparous women in the 60mL group delivered within eight hours (93.10% versus 65.22%, OR=7.2 (CI; 1.35-38.37)). For the nulliparous, the 30mL Foley catheter was associated with a higher caesarean section rate (31.75% versus 15.52% (OR 2.53; CI; 1.1-6.2)). The 60mL Foley catheter was also associated with a higher chance of spontaneous labour after placement (OR 2.35; CI; 1.1-5.1), a shorter time interval for cervical ripening (OR=4.5; CI: 1.2-16.7) and less blood loss. (p=0.002). The Foley catheter ruptured twelve times in the 60mL group whereas this did not happen once in the 30mL group. One case of umbilical cord prolapse was observed in the 60mL group. No differences in neonatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were seen. CONCLUSIONS: For our primary outcome, no difference was observed between the Foley catheter balloon filled with 60mL and the one filled with 30mL. Yet, a Foley catheter filled with 60mL was associated in multiparous women with a higher rate of deliveries within eight hours after amniotomy and in nulliparous with a significantly lower caesarean section rate. These latest findings should be interpreted with cautious as underpowered.

Cervical ripening in the Netherlands: a survey.

Objective. We aim to investigate methods and use of cervical ripening in women without and with a prior cesarean delivery in The Netherlands. Methods. In 2010, we conducted a postal survey in all Dutch hospitals with a labor ward. One gynecologist per hospital was addressed and was asked to respond on behalf of the staff. The questionnaire contained 31 questions concerning cervical ripening and induction of labor. We compared this survey to a similar Dutch survey conducted in 2006. Results. Response rate was 78% (70/92 hospitals). In women without a prior cesarean and in need of cervical ripening, all hospitals (100%) applied prostaglandins (either E1 or E2). In women with a prior cesarean, 21.4% of the hospitals performed an elective cesarean section if delivery was indicated (26.0% in 2006). In case of cervical ripening, 72.7% used mechanical methods (49.1% in 2006), 20.0% used prostaglandins (40.4% in 2006), 3.6% used a combination of prostaglandins and mechanical methods, and 3.6% used membrane-sweeping or oxytocin. Conclusions. In 2010, in The Netherlands, prostaglandins and Foley catheters were the preferred methods for cervical ripening in women without and with a prior cesarean, respectively. Use of mechanical methods in women with a prior cesarean has increased rapidly between 2006 and 2010, corresponding with decreasing use of prostaglandins and elective repeat cesarean sections.