Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Obes Surg ; 22(5): 838-42, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22399326

RESUMO

Although bariatric surgery has become more accessible in recent years, it is unclear whether populations disproportionately affected by obesity are utilizing this treatment. A cross-sectional analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed. The sociodemographic characteristics (race, sex, age, insurance, median income), co-morbidities, and weight loss surgery type were analyzed. Bariatric surgeries increased six-fold from 17,678 in 1998 to 112,882 in 2004 (p < 0.001). Thereafter, bariatric surgeries declined to 93,733 in 2007 (p = 0.24). The proportion of individuals of Other race undergoing bariatric surgery significantly increased, while the proportion of Whites significantly decreased over time. The proportion of individuals in the lowest income quartile (< $25,000) increased, while those in the highest income percentile (> $45,000) decreased. From 1998 to 2007, the sociodemographic characteristics of the bariatric surgery population have changed, although those that are disproportionately affected by morbid obesity continue to be underrepresented.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/tendências , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/etnologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 90(6): 813-9, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22048232

RESUMO

Two important challenges are inherent in the design of studies using prescription data from electronic health records: how to define the minimum level of adherence that would qualify as "continuous drug use" and how to handle stockpiling of medications. Generally, the sensitivity of a study's conclusions to these design choices is not analyzed. In our study, covariate adjusted Cox models were used to compare persistence and durability with respect to three common oral antidiabetic therapies in a cohort of 12,697 incident users. Assuming 50% stockpiling, sulfonylurea therapy, as compared with metformin, showed a significantly lower risk of nonpersistence (changing or stopping therapy) when no gap days were allowed (HR 0.95, P = 0.032), no significant difference when 14 gap days were allowed (HR 0.99, P = 0.536), and significantly greater risk of nonpersistence when 30 gap days were allowed (HR 1.05, P = 0.046). All the drug comparisons showed statistically significant effects in both directions, the risk of nonpersistence increasing or decreasing depending on the design parameters.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Administração Oral , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/provisão & distribuição , Masculino , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Metformina/provisão & distribuição , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/provisão & distribuição , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico
3.
Diabetologia ; 53(5): 832-9, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20084363

RESUMO

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: After achieving glycaemic control, many type 2 diabetic patients relapse to clinically significant levels of hyperglycaemia. We sought to determine the optimal frequency of telephone contact by nurse practitioners that was necessary to prevent glycaemic relapse. METHODS: This parallel, randomised controlled trial ran from June 2002 to February 2006 at an academic medical centre, studying 164 type 2 diabetic patients who had recently achieved glycaemic control. Participants were randomly assigned by sequential, concealed, computer-generated allocation to a 2 year maintenance strategy consisting of: (1) routine follow-up (n = 54); (2) routine follow-up and quarterly telephone contact (n = 55); or (3) routine follow-up and monthly telephone contact (n = 55). Blinding was not possible. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of glycaemic relapse, defined as an increase in HbA(1c) of > or =1%; all participants were analysed. Cumulative incidence and prevalent proportions were compared. Weight change and hypoglycaemia were also assessed. RESULTS: All participants randomised were included in the analyses. The study was completed by 90% of participants and intervention fidelity was high. At 24 months, the cumulative incidence of relapse was 41%. At 12 months, prevalent proportions of relapse were 20%, 14% and 15% for control, quarterly contact and monthly contact, respectively. At 24 months, they were 25%, 21% and 29%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in cumulative incidence or prevalent proportions of relapse among the study arms. Adverse events did not differ between study arms. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This first randomised controlled trial to test an intervention to prevent glycaemic relapse found that regularly scheduled telephone contact by a nurse practitioner was no more effective than routine follow-up care in preventing glycaemic relapse.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperglicemia/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Prevenção Secundária , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 17 Suppl 1: i13-32, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18836062

RESUMO

As the science of quality improvement in health care advances, the importance of sharing its accomplishments through the published literature increases. Current reporting of improvement work in health care varies widely in both content and quality. It is against this backdrop that a group of stakeholders from a variety of disciplines has created the Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence, which we refer to as the SQUIRE publication guidelines or SQUIRE statement. The SQUIRE statement consists of a checklist of 19 items that authors need to consider when writing articles that describe formal studies of quality improvement. Most of the items in the checklist are common to all scientific reporting, but virtually all of them have been modified to reflect the unique nature of medical improvement work. This "Explanation and Elaboration" document (E & E) is a companion to the SQUIRE statement. For each item in the SQUIRE guidelines the E & E document provides one or two examples from the published improvement literature, followed by an analysis of the ways in which the example expresses the intent of the guideline item. As with the E & E documents created to accompany other biomedical publication guidelines, the purpose of the SQUIRE E & E document is to assist authors along the path from completion of a quality improvement project to its publication. The SQUIRE statement itself, this E & E document, and additional information about reporting improvement work can be found at http://www.squire-statement.org.


Assuntos
Editoração/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...