Does XR injectable naltrexone prevent relapse as effectively as daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone?

YES. MONTHLY EXTENDED-RELEASE INJECTABLE NALTREXONE (XR-NTX) TREATS OPIOID USE DISORDER AS EFFECTIVELY AS DAILY SUBLINGUAL BUPRENORPHINE-NALOXONE (BUP-NX) WITHOUT CAUSING ANY INCREASE IN SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS OR FATAL OVERDOSES. (STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: A, 2 GOOD-QUALITY RCTS).

A Financial Model for Team-Based Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use disorder (OUD) affects 2 million Americans, yet many patients do not receive treatment. Lack of team-based care is a common barrier for office-based opioid treatment (OBOT). In 2015, we started OBOT in a family medicine practice. Based on our experiences, we developed a financial model for hiring a team member to provide nonbillable OBOT services through revenue from increased patient volume. METHODS: We completed a retrospective chart review from July 2015 to December 2016 to determine the average difference in medical visits per patient per month pre-OBOT versus post-OBOT. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of visits coded as a Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5, and the percentage of patients with Medicaid, private insurance, or self pay. With this information, we extrapolated to build a financial model to hire a team member to support OBOT. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received OBOT during the study period. There was a net increase of 1.93 visits per patient per month (P < .001). Fourteen patients were insured by Medicaid, 7 had private insurance, and 2 were self pay. Twenty-three percent of OBOT visits were Level 3, 69% were Level 4, and 8% were Level 5. Assuming all visits were reimbursed by Medicaid and accounting for 20% cost of business, treating 1 existing patient for 1 year would generate $1,439. Treating 1 new patient would generate $1,677. CONCLUSIONS: In a fee-for-service model, the revenue generated from increased medical visits can offset the cost of hiring a team member to support nonbillable OBOT services.

Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration: Promoting the Quadruple Aim.

Chronic medical and common behavioral health conditions have been shown to benefit from team-based care approaches that include integrated behavioral health providers. Team-based integrated care can promote the Quadruple Aim, encompassing health care outcomes, patient satisfaction, provider work/life experience, and the cost of care.

Clinical Inquiries: What are the benefits and risks of daily low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of CV events?

One nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) will be avoided for every 126 to 138 adults who take daily aspirin for 10 years (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Taking low-dose aspirin for primary prevention shows no clear mortality benefit. A benefit for primary prevention of stroke is less certain. Although no evidence establishes increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke from daily low-dose aspirin, one gastrointestinal hemorrhage will occur for every 72 to 357 adults who take aspirin for longer than 10 years (SOR: A, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of multiple RCTs and cohort studies).

Challenges in the Screening and Management of Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis imposes a significant burden of morbidity, mortality, and cost on patients and the health care system. Compliance with existing screening and treatment recommendations is low. There are multiple barriers to treatment including complexity of medical management, cost of medications, real and perceived side effects of medications, and nonadherence.

Clinical inquiry: what is the best beta-blocker for systolic heart failure?

Three beta-blockers--carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol--reduce mortality equally (by about 30% over one year) in patients with Class III or IV systolic heart failure. Insufficient evidence exists comparing equipotent doses of these medications head-to-head to recommend any one over the others.