BlazePose-Seq2Seq: Leveraging Regular RGB Cameras for Robust Gait Assessment.

Evaluation of human gait through smartphone-based pose estimation algorithms provides an attractive alternative to costly lab-bound instrumented assessment and offers a paradigm shift with real time gait capture for clinical assessment. Systems based on smart phones, such as OpenPose and BlazePose have demonstrated potential for virtual motion assessment but still lack the accuracy and repeatability standards required for clinical viability. Seq2seq architecture offers an alternative solution to conventional deep learning techniques for predicting joint kinematics during gait. This study introduces a novel enhancement to the low-powered BlazePose algorithm by incorporating a Seq2seq autoencoder deep learning model. To ensure data accuracy and reliability, synchronized motion capture involving an RGB camera and ten Vicon cameras were employed across three distinct self-selected walking speeds. This investigation presents a groundbreaking avenue for remote gait assessment, harnessing the potential of Seq2seq architectures inspired by natural language processing (NLP) to enhance pose estimation accuracy. When comparing BlazePose alone to the combination of BlazePose and 1D convolution Long Short-term Memory Network (1D-LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), the average mean absolute errors decreased from 13.4° to 5.3° for fast gait, from 16.3° to 7.5° for normal gait, and from 15.5° to 7.5° for slow gait at the left ankle joint angle respectively. The strategic utilization of synchronized data and rigorous testing methodologies further bolsters the robustness and credibility of these findings.

A Systematic Review of Gait Analysis in the Context of Multimodal Sensing Fusion and AI.

BACKGROUND: Neurological diseases are a leading cause of disability and mortality. Gait, or human walking, is a significant predictor of quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Gait patterns and other kinematic, kinetic, and balance gait features are accurate and powerful diagnostic and prognostic tools. OBJECTIVE: This review article focuses on the applicability of gait analysis using fusion techniques and artificial intelligence (AI) models. The aim is to examine the significance of mixing several types of wearable and non-wearable sensor data and the impact of this combination on the performance of AI models. METHOD: In this systematic review, 66 studies using more than two modalities to record and analyze gait were identified. 40 studies incorporated multiple gait analysis modalities without the use of artificial intelligence to extract gait features such as kinematic, kinetic, margin of stability, temporal, and spatial gait parameters, as well as cerebral activity. Similarly, 26 studies analyzed gait data using multimodal fusion sensors and AI algorithms. RESULTS: The research summarized here demonstrates that the quality of gait analysis and the effectiveness of AI models can both benefit from the integration of data from many sensors. Meanwhile, the utilization of EMG signals in fusion data is especially advantageous. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review suggest that a smart, portable, wearable-based gait and balance assessment system can be developed using multimodal sensing of the most cutting-edge, clinically relevant tools and technology available. The information presented in this article may serve as a vital springboard for such development.

Sensitivity of subject-specific upper body musculoskeletal model predictions to mass scaling methods.

Accurate predictions of spinal loads in subject-specific musculoskeletal models require precise body segment parameters, including segment mass and center of mass (CoM) locations. Existing upper body models often assume a constant percentage of total body mass to calculate segmental masses, disregarding inter-individual variability and limiting their predictive capacity. This study evaluated the sensitivity of subject-specific upper body musculoskeletal model predictions to body mass scaling methods. The upper body segmental masses and corresponding CoM of six male subjects with varying body mass indices were computed using two mass scaling methods: the constant-percentage-based (CPB) scaling method, commonly used in AnyBody software; and our recently developed body-shape-based (BSB) method. Subsequently, these values were used by a validated musculoskeletal model to predict the muscle and disc forces in upright and flexed postures. The discrepancies between the results of the two scaling methods were compared across subjects and postures. Maximum deviations in thorax masses reached up to 7.5% of total body weight (TBW) in overweight subjects, while maximum CoM location differences of up to 35 mm were observed in normal weight subjects. The root mean squared errors (RMSE) of the CPB results, calculated with the BSB results as baseline, showed that the muscle and shear forces of the two scaling methods were quite similar (<4.5% of TBW). Though, there were small to moderate differences in compressive forces (6.5-16.0% of TBW). Thus, the compressive forces predicted with CPB method should be used with caution, particularly for overweight and obese subjects.

Present and future of gait assessment in clinical practice: Towards the application of novel trends and technologies.

Background: Despite being available for more than three decades, quantitative gait analysis remains largely associated with research institutions and not well leveraged in clinical settings. This is mostly due to the high cost/cumbersome equipment and complex protocols and data management/analysis associated with traditional gait labs, as well as the diverse training/experience and preference of clinical teams. Observational gait and qualitative scales continue to be predominantly used in clinics despite evidence of less efficacy of quantifying gait. Research objective: This study provides a scoping review of the status of clinical gait assessment, including shedding light on common gait pathologies, clinical parameters, indices, and scales. We also highlight novel state-of-the-art gait characterization and analysis approaches and the integration of commercially available wearable tools and technology and AI-driven computational platforms. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted within PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and ScienceDirect for all articles published until December 2021 using a set of keywords, including normal and pathological gait, gait parameters, gait assessment, gait analysis, wearable systems, inertial measurement units, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, insole sensors, electromyography sensors. Original articles that met the selection criteria were included. Results and significance: Clinical gait analysis remains highly observational and is hence subjective and largely influenced by the observer's background and experience. Quantitative Instrumented gait analysis (IGA) has the capability of providing clinicians with accurate and reliable gait data for diagnosis and monitoring but is limited in clinical applicability mainly due to logistics. Rapidly emerging smart wearable technology, multi-modality, and sensor fusion approaches, as well as AI-driven computational platforms are increasingly commanding greater attention in gait assessment. These tools promise a paradigm shift in the quantification of gait in the clinic and beyond. On the other hand, standardization of clinical protocols and ensuring their feasibility to map the complex features of human gait and represent them meaningfully remain critical challenges.