Prediction of Non-Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients with 18F-FDG PET Radiomics Based Machine Learning Classification.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 26% of esophageal cancer (EC) patients do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), emphasizing the need for pre-treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict non-response using a radiomic model on baseline 18F-FDG PET. METHODS: Retrospectively, 143 18F-FDG PET radiomic features were extracted from 199 EC patients (T1N1-3M0/T2-4aN0-3M0) treated between 2009 and 2019. Non-response (n = 57; 29%) was defined as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 4-5 (n = 44; 22%) or interval progression (n = 13; 7%). Randomly, 139 patients (70%) were allocated to explore all combinations of 24 feature selection strategies and 6 classification methods towards the cross-validated average precision (AP). The predictive value of the best-performing model, i.e AP and area under the ROC curve analysis (AUC), was evaluated on an independent test subset of 60 patients (30%). RESULTS: The best performing model had an AP (mean ± SD) of 0.47 ± 0.06 on the training subset, achieved by a support vector machine classifier trained on five principal components of relevant clinical and radiomic features. The model was externally validated with an AP of 0.66 and an AUC of 0.67. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the best-performing model on pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET radiomics and clinical features had a small clinical benefit to identify non-responders to nCRT in EC.

Utility of Preoperative Computed Tomography-Based Body Metrics in Relation to Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Recipients.

Computed tomography (CT)-derived body metrics such as skeletal muscle index (SMI), psoas muscle index (PMI), and subcutaneous fat area index (ScFI) are measurable components of sarcopenia, frailty, and nutrition. While these body metrics are advocated in adults for predicting postoperative outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), little is known about their value in pediatric populations. This study assessed the relation between preoperative CT-based body metrics and postoperative short-term outcomes in pediatric LT recipients. Patients aged 0-18 years who underwent a primary LT were retrospectively included (n = 101; median age 0.5 years; range 0.2-17.1). SMI, PMI, and ScFI were derived from preoperative axial CT slices. Postoperative outcomes and complications within 90 days were correlated with the CT-based body metrics. To classify postoperative infections, the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification was used. Subgroup analyses were performed for age groups (<1, 1-10, and >10 years old). An optimal threshold for test performance was defined using Youden's J-statistic and receiver operating characteristic curve as appropriate. ScFI was significantly (P = 0.001) correlated with moderate to severe postoperative infections (CD grade 3-5) in children aged <1 year, with the optimal ScFI threshold being ≤27.1 cm2 /m2 (sensitivity 80.4% and specificity 77.8%). A weak negative correlation between SMI and the total duration of hospital stay (R = -0.3; P = 0.01) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (R = -0.3; P = 0.01) was observed in children aged <1 year. No other associations between CT-based body metrics and postoperative outcomes were shown. In children aged <1 year with cirrhotic liver disease undergoing LT, preoperative CT-based body metrics were correlated with moderate to severe postoperative infections (ScFI) and with longer duration of hospital and ICU stay (SMI), and thus can be considered important tools for pre-LT risk assessment.

Effect of Extending the Original CROSS Criteria on Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A National Multicenter Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extending the original criteria of the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) in daily practice may increase the treatment outcome of esophageal cancer (EC) patients. This retrospective national cohort study assessed the impact on the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and surgical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from EC patients treated between 2009 and 2017 were collected from the national Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit database. Patients had locally advanced EC (cT1/N+ or cT2-4a/N0-3/M0) and were treated according to the CROSS regimen. CROSS (n = 1942) and the extended CROSS (e-CROSS; n = 1359) represent patients fulfilling the original or extended CROSS criteria, respectively. The primary outcome was total pCR (ypT0N0), while secondary outcomes were local esophageal pCR (ypT0), surgical radicality, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Overall, CROSS and e-CROSS did not differ in total or local pCR rate, although a trend was observed (23.2% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.052; and 26.7% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.061). When stratifying by histology, the pCR rate was higher in the CROSS group compared with e-CROSS in squamous cell carcinomas (48.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.000) but not in adenocarcinomas (16.8% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.908). Surgical radicality did not differ between groups. Postoperative mortality (3.2% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.037) and morbidity (58.3% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.048) were higher in e-CROSS. CONCLUSION: Extending the CROSS inclusion criteria for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in routine clinical practice of EC patients had no impact on the pCR rate and on radicality, but was associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Importantly, effects differed between histological subtypes. Hence, in future studies, we should carefully reconsider who will benefit most in the real-world setting.

Mass-Forming Portal Biliopathy Presenting as Extreme Wall-Thickening of the Common Bile Duct.

Portal biliopathy refers to biliary tree abnormalities in patients with peribiliary collateral vessels and non-neoplastic extrahepatic portal vein occlusion. These biliary abnormalities are caused by vascular compression and ischemic damage of the biliary tree, which can result in bile duct compression, stenosis, fibrotic strictures, bile duct dilation, and thickening of the bile duct wall. Portal biliopathy is difficult to distinguish from cholangiocarcinoma, IgG4-related disease, and sclerosing cholangitis. Although most patients are asymptomatic, portal biliopathy can lead to serious complications, such as recurrent cholangitis. This case illustrates the importance of including portal biliopathy in the differential diagnosis at an early stage, especially in patients with portal hypertension. With early recognition, the need for additional invasive diagnostic procedures such as biopsies is minimized. Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostics, and treatment options of portal biliopathy are described in the article.

Reliability of clinical nodal status regarding response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery alone and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients.

Background: Clinical nodal (cN) staging is a key element in treatment decisions in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). The reliability of cN status regarding the effect on response and survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with esophagectomy was evaluated in determining the up- and downstaged pathological nodal (pN) status after surgery alone. Material and methods: From a prospective database, we included all 395 EC patients who had surgery with curative intent with or without nCRT between 2000 and 2015. All patients were staged by a standard pretreatment protocol: 16-64 mdCT, 18 F-FDG-PET or 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and EUS ± FNA. After propensity score matching on baseline clinical tumor and nodal (cT/N) stage and histopathology, a surgery-alone and nCRT group (each N = 135) were formed. Clinical and pathological N stage was scored as equal (cN = pN), downstaged (cN > pN) or upstaged (cN < pN). Prognostic impact on disease free survival (DFS) was assessed with multivariable Cox regression analysis (factors with p value <.1 on univariable analysis). Results: The surgery-alone and nCRT group did not differ in cT/N status. Pathologic examination revealed equal staging (32 vs. 27%), nodal up (43 vs. 16%) and downstaging (25 vs. 56%), respectively (p < .001). Nodal up-staging was common in cT3-4a tumors and adenocarcinomas in the surgery-alone group, while nodal downstaging was found in half of cT1-2 and cT3-4 regardless of tumortype after nCRT. Prognostic factors for DFS were pN (p = .002) and lymph-angioinvasion (p = .016) in surgery-alone, and upper abdominal cN metastases (p = .012) and lymph node ratio (p = .034) in the nCRT group. Conclusions: Despite modern staging methods, correct cN staging remains difficult in EC. Nodal overstaging (cN > pN) occurred more often than understaging impeding an adequate assessment of pathologic complete response and prognosis after nCRT.

Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy with Baseline and Restaging 18F-FDG PET Imaging Biomarkers in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Purpose To assess the value of baseline and restaging fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics in predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 73 patients with histologic analysis-confirmed T1/N1-3/M0 or T2-4a/N0-3/M0 esophageal cancer were treated with NCRT followed by surgery (Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study regimen) between October 2014 and August 2017. Clinical variables and radiomic features from baseline and restaging 18F-FDG PET were selected by univariable logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The selected variables were used to fit a multivariable logistic regression model, which was internally validated by using bootstrap resampling with 20 000 replicates. The performance of this model was compared with reference prediction models composed of maximum standardized uptake value metrics, clinical variables, and maximum standardized uptake value at baseline NCRT radiomic features. Outcome was defined as complete versus incomplete pathologic response (tumor regression grade 1 vs 2-5 according to the Mandard classification). Results Pathologic response was complete in 16 patients (21.9%) and incomplete in 57 patients (78.1%). A prediction model combining clinical T-stage and restaging NCRT (post-NCRT) joint maximum (quantifying image orderliness) yielded an optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.81. Post-NCRT joint maximum was replaceable with five other redundant post-NCRT radiomic features that provided equal model performance. All reference prediction models exhibited substantially lower discriminatory accuracy. Conclusion The combination of clinical T-staging and quantitative assessment of post-NCRT 18F-FDG PET orderliness (joint maximum) provided high discriminatory accuracy in predicting pathologic complete response in patients with esophageal cancer. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Influence of tumor response and treatment schedule on the distribution of tumor recurrence in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) schedules and pathologic complete response (pCR) on the distribution of recurrence is unclear in esophageal cancer (EC). We assessed the effect of pCR and nCRT schedule in EC. METHODS: Patients with T1N+/T2-4aN0-3/M0 EC treated in different centers, with either carboplatin/paclitaxel/41.4 Gy (CROSS: n = 134) or Cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/45-50.4 Gy (Cis/5FU: n = 88) followed by surgery were included. The effect of pCR on distribution and site-specific recurrence was determined for the CROSS group. After propensity score matching we compared the impact of both schedules (n = 63 each) on the recurrence pattern. RESULTS: Overall (P = 0.005) and disease-free survival (P = 0.002) were significantly longer after pCR (n = 24). The pattern of recurrence differed between pCR and non-pCR group (P = 0.001) for locoregional (0 vs 7; 6.4%), distant (5; 20.8% vs 36; 32.7%), and combined local and distant (0 vs 21; 19.1%), respectively. After pCR, less local and distant recurrences were seen (P = 0.008). With equal median time to recurrence, the distribution of metastases only differed for lung metastases (P = 0.029), with 15 (23.8%) in the CROSS group versus 6 (9.5%) following Cis/5FU. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pCR have less local and distant recurrence. The nCRT regime had a minor influence on the site-specific distribution of recurrence.