Lower doses of carvedilol in Japanese heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction could show the potential to be non-inferior to higher doses in US patients: An international collaborative observational study.

The Japanese national guidelines recommend significantly lower doses of carvedilol for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) management than the US guidelines. Using real-world data, we determined whether initial and target doses of carvedilol in Japanese patients (JPNs) differ from those in US patients (USPs), especially in Asian Americans (ASA) and Caucasians (CA), and investigated differences in outcomes. We collected data from the electronic medical records, including demographics, carvedilol dosing, tolerability, cardiac functional indicators like EF, cardiovascular events including all-cause deaths, and laboratory values from the University of California, San Diego Health and Osaka University. JPNs had significantly lower doses (mg/day) of carvedilol initiation (66 USPs composed of 38 CAs and 28 ASAs, 17.1±16.2; 93 JPNs, 4.3±4.2, p<0.001) and one year after initiation (33.0±21.8; 11.2±6.5, p<0.001), and a significantly lower relative rate (RR) of dose discontinuation and reduction than USPs (RR: 0.406, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.181-0.911, p<0.05). CAs showed the highest reduction rate (0.184), and ASAs had the highest discontinuation rate (0.107). A slight mean difference with narrow 95% CI ranges straddling zero was observed between the two regions in the change from the baseline of each cardiac functional indicator (LVEF, -0.68 [-5.49-4.12]; LVDd, -0.55 [-3.24-2.15]; LVDd index, -0.25 [-1.92-1.43]; LVDs, -0.03 [-3.84-3.90]; LVDs index, -0.04 [-2.38-2.30]; heart rate, 1.62 [-3.07-6.32]). The event-free survival showed no difference (p = 0.172) among the races. Conclusively, despite JPNs exhibiting markedly lower carvedilol doses, their dose effectiveness has the potential to be non-inferior to that in USPs. Dose de-escalation, not discontinuation, could be an option in some Asian and ASA HFrEF patients intolerable to high doses of carvedilol.

Anticoagulant Use in High Stroke-Risk Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Background Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with moderate-to high-stroke risk. Objective To examine nationally reflective OAC usage in incident NVAF patients longitudinally. Design Three-year retrospective cohort analysis. Setting Medicare Part D recipients in the contiguous United States. PARTICIPANTS: 52,465 Medicare beneficiaries with incident NVAF in 2010 with two or more atrial fibrillation diagnoses seven or more days apart. Main outcome measure Stroke risk via congestive heart failure, hypertension, age greater than or equal to 75, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score. Primary outcome was proportion of patients receiving one or more OACs post-NVAF diagnoses. Results Of 48,980 high-risk patients, 32.7% received one or more OAC within 60 days of diagnosis. By close of 2011, 48% had one or more OAC. OAC use increased to 52.9% by close of 2012. Conclusions Fewer than 33% of high-risk NVAF patients received OACs within 60 days of diagnosis in 2010. Despite increased use over time, oral anticoagulation was below 53% at study end. Use of OACs declined with CHA2DS2-VASc greater than 6. Expanded efforts are warranted to augment OAC use in high stroke-risk patients.

Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Emboli.

Under most circumstances, the goal of treatment of pulmonary embolism is the prevention of recurrent embolic events, achieved through conventional anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin or a low molecular weight heparin, followed by warfarin therapy for a minimum of 6 months. When acute pulmonary embolism is associated with significant right ventricular dysfunction or systemic hypotension, more aggressive intervention may be warranted. Under these circumstances, potential interventions include thrombolytic therapy (either systemic or catheter-directed), placement of an inferior vena caval filter, catheter-based embolectomy, or surgical embolectomy. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may develop in a small minority of patients who survive an acute, massive embolic event or who have suffered recurrent thromboembolic events. Due to the fixed nature of the pulmonary vascular obstruction, vasodilator therapy has proven far less effective in chronic thromboembolic disease than it has in primary pulmonary hypertension and other secondary forms of pulmonary hypertension. Correction of hypoxemia and volume overload and the prevention of recurrent embolic events are essential. Definitive therapy, however, requires surgical intervention to remove the chronic thromboembolic obstruction and to restore patency of the pulmonary vascular bed.