Management of acute paediatric fractures treated surgically in the UK: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of acute paediatric orthopaedic trauma managed surgically across the NHS is poorly described. Compliance against national standards for the management of supracondylar humeral fractures is also unknown at a national level. METHODS: Collaborators in 129 NHS hospitals prospectively collected data on surgically managed acute paediatric orthopaedic trauma cases. Data were collected over a seven-day period and included demographics, injury characteristics, operative details and timing of surgery. A national audit was also undertaken to evaluate compliance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma Guideline 11: Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children. RESULTS: Data were captured on 770 surgically treated cases. The three most common injuries were forearm fractures of both bones (n = 235), distal radius fractures (n = 194) and supracondylar elbow fractures (n = 89). The mode day of injury was Friday (n = 136) and the mode day of surgery was Saturday (n = 138). 88% of supracondylar fractures received surgery on the day of presentation or the following day. Only 14% of supracondylar fractures were treated surgically after 8pm; 33/89 used 2.0mm Kirschner wires, 38/89 used 1.6mm wires and 2/89 used 1.2mm wires. CONCLUSION: Forearm fractures of both bones, distal radius fractures and supracondylar humeral fractures were the three most common injuries treated surgically. There is wide variation in compliance against national standards in the management of supracondylar humeral fractures with 88% undertaking surgery on the day of or the day following presentation but only 37% using the recommended 2.0mm Kirschner wires.

The 'clicky hip': to refer or not to refer?

Aims: The significance of the 'clicky hip' in neonatal and infant examination remains controversial with recent conflicting papers reigniting the debate. We aimed to quantify rates of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in babies referred with 'clicky hips' to our dedicated DDH clinic. Patients and Methods: A three-year prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2014 and 2016 assessing the diagnosis and treatment outcomes of all children referred specifically with 'clicky hips' as the primary reason for referral to our dedicated DDH clinic. Depending on their age, they were all imaged with either ultrasound scan or radiographs. Results: There were 69 'clicky hip' referrals over the three-year period. This represented 26.9% of the total 257 referrals received in that time. The mean age at presentation was 13.6 weeks (1 to 84). A total of 19 children (28%) referred as 'clicky hips' were noted to have hip abnormalities on ultrasound scan, including 15 with Graf Type II hips (7 bilateral), one Graf Type III hip, and three Graf Type IV hips. Of these, ten children were treated with a Pavlik harness, with two requiring subsequent closed reduction in theatre; one child was treated primarily with a closed reduction and adductor tenotomy. In total, 11 (15.9%) of the 69 'clicky hip' referrals required intervention with either harness or surgery. Conclusion: Our study provides further evidence that the 'clicky hip' referral can represent an underlying diagnosis of DDH and should, in our opinion, always lead to further clinical and radiological assessment. In the absence of universal ultrasound screening, we would encourage individual units to carefully assess their own outcomes and protocols for 'clicky hip' referrals and tailor ongoing service provision to local populations and local referral practices. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1249-52.

Newborn and infant physical examination standards in a dedicated clinic for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Introduction In 2014 our centre started a dedicated clinic for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The aim of the clinic was to streamline DDH referrals, enabling timely review, imaging and multidisciplinary treatment. Ongoing audit has been carried out based on the UK National Screening Committee newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) guidelines, first published in 2008. Methods A three-year prospective audit was undertaken between 2014 and 2016 assessing compliance with NIPE standards (ST2b and ST2d) relating to timeliness of expert consultation following positive ultrasonography findings of DDH with positive examination or risk factors. Results A total of 257 babies born between January 2014 and December 2016 were seen in our dedicated DDH clinic, with 106 with abnormalities on ultrasonography and 54 requiring treatment. Compliance with 'expert consultation within 4 weeks of age for babies with an abnormality detected on clinical examination and positive ultrasonography' improved from 50% in 2014 to 53% in 2015 and 71% in 2016. Compliance with 'expert consultation within 8 weeks of age for babies with positive risk factors, negative examination and positive ultrasonography' improved from 65% in 2014 to 93% in 2015 and 100% in 2016. Conclusions This prospective audit assessing timeliness of expert consultation has demonstrated ongoing improvements between 2014 and 2016. A greater proportion of babies with ultrasonography evidence of DDH have been seen at the appropriate time. In the majority of cases, this has enabled timely non-invasive treatment with a Pavlik harness rather than surgery.

Behavioral and fMRI evidence of the differing cognitive load of domain-specific assessments.

Standards-referenced educational reform has increased the prevalence of standardized testing; however, whether these tests accurately measure students' competencies has been questioned. This may be due to domain-specific assessments placing a differing domain-general cognitive load on test-takers. To investigate this possibility, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to identify and quantify the neural correlates of performance on current, international standardized methods of spelling assessment. Out-of-scanner testing was used to further examine differences in assessment results. Results provide converging evidence that: (a) the spelling assessments differed in the cognitive load placed on test-takers; (b) performance decreased with increasing cognitive load of the assessment; and (c) brain regions associated with working memory were more highly activated during performance of assessments that were higher in cognitive load. These findings suggest that assessment design should optimize the cognitive load placed on test-takers, to ensure students' results are an accurate reflection of their true levels of competency.