Train for the Game: What Is the Learning Environment of Deployed Navy Emergency Medicine Physicians?

OBJECTIVES: Medicine is a practice characterized by ongoing learning, and unique qualities of the operational learning environment (LE) may affect learner needs. When physicians move between differing practice environments learners may encounter situations for which they are unprepared. Using a conceptual framework specific to the LE, we therefore asked the following research question: what is the difference in LE for Navy emergency medicine (EM) physicians who practice in U.S. hospitals but serve an operational environment, and how do these differences shape their learning needs? METHODS: We interviewed Navy EM physicians who recently deployed to explore their perceptions of the deployed LE, how it differed from the LE they practice in stateside, and the perceived effect this difference had on their learning needs. We used the constant comparative method to gather and analyze data until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 physicians and identified six interconnected themes consistent with the LE framework in the literature: 1) patient care is central to the learning experience; 2) professional isolation versus connectedness; 3) a sense of meaningful practice engages the learner in the LE; 4) physicians as educators shape the LE; 5) team trust impacts the LE; and 6) the larger military organization impacts the LE. CONCLUSIONS: Our themes span the conceptual framework put forth by previous work and did not find themes outside this framework. These interconnected themes describe the difference in LE between the stateside and deployed setting and impact the learning needs of Navy EM physicians. These results inform strategies to position the deployed medical unit for success.

Comparison of pediatric post-reduction fluoroscopic- and ultrasound forearm fracture images.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department (ED) reduction of pediatric fractures occurs most commonly in the forearm and can be challenging if fluoroscopy is not available. We sought to assess the ability of point of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) to predict adequacy of reduction by fluoroscopy. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled ED patients 0-17 years of age with radial and/or ulnar fractures requiring reduction under fluoroscopic guidance. Post-reduction POCUS (probe dorsal, volar, and coronal) and fluoroscopic (AP and lateral) fracture images were recorded. Fracture angles were compared between blinded POCUS and fluoroscopic measurements and between POCUS measurements by a blinded emergency physician and a blinded radiologist, reporting mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of POCUS in the prediction of fluoroscopically detected post-reduction malalignment, as interpreted by a blinded pediatric orthopaedist. RESULTS: The 58 patients were 7.9 ±â€¯3.5 years of age and had 21 radial (36%), 1 ulnar (2%), and 36 radioulnar (62%) fractures. Fluoroscopy and POCUS angles were within a mean of 0.1°-3.2°, depending on the site and surface measured. Radiologist- and emergency physician-interpreted POCUS measurements were within a mean of 1° in all dimensions. POCUS identified inadequate reductions with 100% sensitivity and 92-93% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded emergency medicine and radiology interpretations of post-reduction POCUS fracture images agree closely. Post-reduction POCUS measurements are comparable to those obtained by fluoroscopy and accurately predict adequacy of reduction. POCUS can be used to guide pediatric fracture reduction when bedside fluoroscopy is not available in the ED.

Bedside emergency ultrasound in a case of acute parotid duct sialolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Sialolithiasis with salivary gland obstruction can mimic more frequently occurring illnesses such as facial and dental infection and abscess. It is often difficult to discern the etiology of facial pain and swelling on physical examination alone, requiring advanced imaging in the emergency department. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 37-year-old man who presented with 5 days of worsening unilateral facial pain and swelling. Use of bedside emergency ultrasound by an emergency physician (EP) led to an appropriate diagnosis of parotid duct sialolithiasis. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? Use of bedside emergency ultrasound performed by a trained EP successfully diagnosed symptomatic sialolithiasis of the parotid duct in the emergency department without the need for computed tomography. The utility of bedside emergency ultrasound in the evaluation of sialolithiasis and the outcomes of our case are discussed here.

E-point septal separation: a bedside tool for emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be critical among emergency department (ED) patients. This study examined the predictive relationship between ED physician performed bedside mitral-valve E-point septal separation (EPSS) measurements to the quantitative, calculated LVEF. We further evaluated the relationship between ED physician visual estimates of global cardiac function (GCF) and calculated LVEF values. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on a sequential convenience sample of patients receiving comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Three ED ultrasound fellows performed bedside ultrasound examinations to obtain both EPSS measurements and subjective visual GCF estimates. A linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the relation of EPSS to the calculated LVEF from the comprehensive TTE. Agreement (modified Cohen κ) between ED ultrasound fellow GCF estimates and the calculated LVEF was also assessed. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses revealed a significant correlation (r=0.73, P<.001) between bedside EPSS and the calculated LVEF. The sensitivity and specificity of an EPSS measurement of greater than 7 mm for severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤30%) were 100.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.9-100.0) and 51.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.6-64.5), respectively. Subjective estimates of GCF were moderately correlated with calculated LVEF (Cohen κ=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of EPSS by ED physicians were significantly associated with the calculated measurements of LVEF from comprehensive TTE. Subjective visual estimates of GCF, however, demonstrated only moderate agreement with the calculated LVEF. An EPSS measurement greater than 7 mm was uniformly sensitive at identifying patients with severely reduced LVEF.