Management of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy: is surgery always necessary?

AIMS: The diagnosis of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions (RSs/CSLs) onpercutaneous biopsy carries a risk of histological underestimation. Consequently, surgical excision is often performed in order to exclude a possible associated malignancy. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of 'upgrade to carcinoma' upon subsequent surgical excision of RS/CSL cases diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy (VALCB). We also analysed the risk factors for upgrade in order to determine a subset of patients who could avoid surgery and benefit from conservative management with clinical and imaging follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational single-centre study on 174 consecutive RS/CSL cases diagnosed on VALCB from May 2008 to October 2015. Univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical, radiological and histological risk factors for upgrade. Surgical excision was performed following VALCB diagnosis of 88 RS/CSL cases with or without associated atypia. The overall rate of surgical upgrade to carcinoma was 9.1% (8/88). None of the benign biopsies without atypia was surgically upgraded. Additional to atypia, risk factors for upgrade were non-incidental finding of the RS/CSL, the mammographic appearance, and the number of fragments obtained during the biopsy procedure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that VALCB revealing an RS/CSL is reliable for excluding malignancy when there is no associated atypia and when radiological and histological findings are concordant. In such cases, surgery can be avoided in favour of clinical and imaging follow-up. When an RS/CSL is associated with atypia, the decision to perform surgical excision depends on other associated risk factors.

Single-Centre Experience with Percutaneous Cryoablation of Breast Cancer in 23 Consecutive Non-surgical Patients.

AIM: To present our single-centre prospective experience on the use of cryoablation (CA) applied to treat primary breast cancer (BC) in a cohort of patients unsuitable for surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive post-menopausal female patients (median age 85 years; range 56-96) underwent percutaneous CA of unifocal, biopsy-proven BC, under ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT) guidance. Clinical and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) follow-ups were systematically scheduled at 3, 12, 18 and 24 months. Local tumour control was assessed by comparing baseline and follow-up DCE-MRI. RESULTS: Twenty-three BC (median size 14 mm) were treated under local anaesthesia (78.3 %) or local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (21.7 %). Median number of cryo-probes applied per session was 2.0. A "dual-freezing" protocol was applied for the first ten patients and a more aggressive "triple-freezing" protocol for the remaining 13. Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Five patients recurred during follow-up and two were successfully re-treated with CA. Five patients presented immediate CA-related complications: four hematomas evolved uneventfully at 3-month follow-up and one skin burn resulted in skin inflammation and skin retraction at 3 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous CA is safe and well tolerated for non-resected elderly BC patients. Procedures can be proposed under local anaesthesia only. Given the insulation properties of the breast gland, aggressive CA protocols are required. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the potential role of CA in the local treatment of early BC.

Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. Time to reconsider the standard attitude.

BACKGROUND: While the addition of targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) dramatically increases the rate of pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer, no reduction in the rate of mastectomy has been observed in randomised studies. METHODS: A retrospective single centre analysis of all patients treated with anti HER2-based NACT for T2-4 breast cancer, focusing on patients treated with mastectomy. RESULTS: Among 165 patients treated between June 2005 and July 2012, surgery was performed immediately post-NACT in 152 cases (92%). Breast-conserving surgery could be performed for 108 of the patients (71%), with a 4-year local relapse-free survival of 97%. A mastectomy was performed in two cases following patients' wishes and in 37 cases based on pre-NACT findings (n = 18) or post-NACT outcomes (n = 19). For 21 out of the 37 cases, a good pathological response was observed, and multidisciplinary reanalysis suggests that breast-conserving surgery outright may have been sufficient for 12 patients. Finally, a salvage mastectomy based on post-lumpectomy pathological results was decided in five cases (11%). The 4-year metastasis-free survival was 84% for all patients operated on after NACT (n = 152). CONCLUSIONS: Given the good efficacy of anti HER2-based NACT, breast-conserving surgery should be standard practice for most patients. Total mastectomy on the other hand should be restricted to a few patients, mainly those with positive margins on the lumpectomy specimen.

All atypia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy do not need surgical excision.

The necessity of excision is debatable when atypia are diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (microbiopsy). Among the 287 surgical excisions performed at Institut Bergonié from 1999 to 2009, we selected a case-control study group of 151 excisions; 52 involving all the diagnosed cancers and 99 randomly selected among the 235 excisions without cancer, following atypical microbiopsy (24 flat epithelial atypia; 50 atypical ductal hyperplasia; 14 lobular neoplasia; 63 mixed lesions). Mammographical calcification (type, extension, complete removal) and histological criteria of epithelial atypia (type, number of foci, size/extension), topography and microcalcification extension at microbiopsy were compared according to the presence or absence of cancer at excision. Factors associated with cancer at excision were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS5) lesions, large and/or multiple foci of mammographical calcifications, histological type, number, size and extension of atypical foci. Flat epithelial atypia alone was never associated with cancer at excision. BI-RADS5, atypical ductal hyperplasia (alone or predominant) and >3 foci of atypia were identified as independent pejorative factors. There was never any cancer at excision when these pejorative factors were absent (n=31). Presence of one (n=59), two (n=23) or three (n=14) factors was associated with cancer in 24, 15 and 13 cases with an odds ratio=5.8 (95% CI: 3-11.2) for each additional factor. We recommend that mammographical data and histological characteristics be taken into account in the decision-making process after diagnosis of atypia on microbiopsy. With experienced senologists and strict histological criteria, some patients could be spared surgery resulting in significant patient, financial and time advantages.