RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to evaluate the cognitive and driving outcomes of a holistic neurorehabilitation program and to examine the relationship between the neuropsychological variables of attention, speed of information processing, and visuospatial functioning and driving outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight individuals with heterogeneous neurological etiologies who participated in a holistic neurorehabilitation program. Holistic neurorehabilitation consisted of therapies focusing on physical, cognitive, language, emotional, and interpersonal functioning, including training in compensatory strategies. Neuropsychological testing was administered at admission and prior to starting driving or program discharge. Subtests of processing speed, working memory, and perceptual reasoning from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III and Trail Making Test were included. RESULTS: At the time of discharge, 54% of the individuals returned to driving. Statistical analyses revealed that at the time of discharge: the sample as a group made significant improvements on cognitive measures included in the study; the driving and non-driving groups differed significantly on aspects of processing speed, attention, abstract reasoning, working memory, and visuospatial functions. Further, at the time of admission, the driving group performed significantly better than the non-driving group on several neuropsychological measures. CONCLUSION: Cognitive functions of attention, working memory, visual-motor coordination, motor and mental speed, and visual scanning significantly contribute to predicting driving status of individuals after neurorehabilitation. Holistic neurorehabilitation facilitates recovery and helps individuals to gain functional independence after brain injury.
RESUMO
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship of cognitive retraining performance to discharge driving status. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: One hundred and three brain-injured patients from a holistic milieu-oriented work/school re-entry programme. EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTIONS: Initial, last, mean, and best cognitive retraining scores; Behavioural Checklist ratings; Working Alliance (WA) scores. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: At the time of discharge, 50.5% of the sample were cleared to drive. Better performance on a cognitive retraining task addressing information processing and motor speed, focused attention, visual scanning and memory was associated with clearance to drive. Patients' behavioural approach to cognitive retraining tasks (use of compensations, organizational and procedural skills) and higher mean and discharge WA scores with staff were associated with driving clearance. Higher mean WA scores were also related to an enhanced behavioural approach to cognitive retraining tasks, including timeliness to sessions, compensation use, better communication pragmatics, decreased distractibility and the ability to apply the 'big picture' benefits of cognitive retraining to the 'real world'. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive retraining exercises that incorporate skill remediation, 'process' variables and metacognitive skills, as well as a better WA with patients, positively related to clearance to drive at the time of discharge from a holistic milieu-oriented programme.
