Transplantation and immigration: Comparing infectious complications and outcomes between foreign-born and US-born kidney transplant recipients in Minnesota.

BACKGROUND: Foreign-born kidney transplant recipients (FBKTRs) are at increased risk for reactivation of latent infections that may impact outcomes. We aimed to compare the etiology of infections and outcomes between FBKTR and United States KTRs (USKTR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at two transplant centers in Minnesota. Frequency and etiology of infections as well as outcomes (graft function, rejection, and patient survival) at 1-year post-transplant between FBKTR and USKTR were compared. RESULTS: Of the 573 transplant recipients, 124 (21.6%) were foreign-born and 449 (78.4%) US-born. At least one infection occurred in 411 (71.7%) patients (38.2% bacterial, 55% viral, 9.4% fungal). Viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, particularly BK viremia (38.7% vs. 21.2%, p < .001). No statistical differences were found for bacterial or fungal infections; no parasitic infections were identified in either group. No geographically-restricted infections were noted aside from a single case of Madura foot in a FBKTR. Rejection episodes were more common in USKTR (p = .037), but stable/improving graft function (p = .976) and mortality (p = .451) at 1-year posttransplantation were similar in both groups. After adjusting for covariates, previous transplantation was associated with a higher number of infections (IRR 1.35, 95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.73, p = .020). CONCLUSION: Although viral infections were more frequent in FBKTR, overall frequency and etiology of most infections and outcomes were similar between FBKTR and USKTR suggesting that comprehensive transplant care is providing timely prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of latent infections in FBKTR.

Fingolimod-associated macular edema controlled with nepafenac non-steroidal anti-inflammatory opthalmologic applications.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod, an immunomodulatory agent, is used for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Fingolimod-associated macular edema (FAME) is a known complication with an incidence of 0.4%. The current recommendation for treatment of FAME is cessation of fingolimod. There are few case reports with management of FAME with steroid eye drops. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old Caucasian female patient with history of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and treated with fingolimod developed Fingolimod-associated macular edema (FAME). Nevertheless, FAME was successfully treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops without discontinuation of fingolimod. CONCLUSION: FAME may be managed with non-steroidal eye drops without discontinuation of fingolimod in appropriate patient monitored with close follow up.