A Case of Cardiac Arrest Caused by Air Embolism from Routine Root Canal Procedure.

Venous air embolism (VAE) occurs when air is introduced into the venous system and subsequently travels into the right heart and pulmonary circulation. VAE mainly occurs from air that is forced by positive pressure or drawn in by negative pressure. We present a rare case of fatal VAE that occurred during a routine dental root canal procedure. A 69-year-old male was undergoing a root canal procedure at an outpatient dental office under local anesthesia. During the procedure, he went into cardiopulmonary arrest. He was resuscitated, and return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Thoracic computed tomography was performed and revealed large amounts of air within the right ventricle and portal venous system. VAE should be recognized as a potentially fatal complication resulting from routine dental procedures.

Role of adenosine after antral pulmonary vein isolation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine can reveal dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after PV isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of elimination of adenosine-provoked dormant PV conduction after PVI has not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether ablation of PV reconnections unmasked by adenosine improves outcomes. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 129) were randomized to receive either adenosine (n = 61) or no adenosine (n = 68) after PVI. Dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after PVI was ablated until all adenosine-mediated reconnections were eliminated. Thereafter, both groups received isoproterenol. RESULTS: Acute reconnection was seen in 23 patients (37%) in the adenosine group. There was a significant difference between the number of PVs reconnected if patients were given adenosine >60 minutes after initial PVI compared to those who received adenosine <60 minutes after initial PVI (3/32 [9.4%] vs 24/32 [75%], P <.0001). Patients who did not receive adenosine had more PV reconnections after isoproterenol infusion compared to patients in the adenosine group (17/68 [25.0%] vs 5/61 [8.2%], P = .018). There was no difference in the rate of AF recurrence in patients who received adenosine (24/61 [39%]) compared to control patients (23/68 [34%], log-rank P = .83). CONCLUSION: Adenosine can reveal dormant conduction in more than one-third of patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI. However, adenosine administration, and additional ablation of the resultant connections, does not improve long-term outcomes compared to a protocol that includes isoproterenol infusion.