Antibiotic consumption in hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) results in similar clinical characteristics as bacterial respiratory tract infections and can potentially lead to antibiotic overuse. This study aimed to determine the changes in hospital antimicrobial usage before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: We compared antimicrobial consumption data for 2019 and 2020. Inpatient antibiotic consumption was determined and expressed as a defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 occupied bed days, following the World Health Organization (WHO) methods. The WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification was used. RESULTS: The total antimicrobial consumption in 2020 increased by 16.3% compared to consumption in 2019. In 2020, there was a reduction in fourth-generation cephalosporins (-30%), third-generation cephalosporins (-29%), and combinations of penicillins (-23%). In contrast, antibiotics that were consumed more during 2020 compared with 2019 included linezolid (374%), vancomycin (66.6%), and carbapenem (7%). Linezolid is the only antibiotic from the Reserve group on the hospital's formulary. Antibiotic usage from the Access group was reduced by 17%, while antibiotic usage from the Watch group and the Reserve group was increased by 3% and 374%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show a significant shift in antibiotic usage from the Access group to the Watch and Reserve groups. The Watch and Reserve groups are known to be associated with increased resistance to antibiotics. Therefore, antimicrobial stewardship should be increased and maintained during the pandemic to ensure appropriate antibiotic use.

Effects of Fill Volume and Humidification on Aerosol Delivery During Single-Limb Noninvasive Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to determine the effect of fill volume and humidification change on aerosol delivery during single-limb noninvasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS: Four groups were recruited, each consisting of 12 subjects (6 females) with COPD receiving NIV. Groups 1 and 3 received inhaled salbutamol with a vibrating mesh nebulizer, and Groups 2 and 4 received inhaled salbutamol with a jet nebulizer. The in vivo study was carried out on days 1 and 3. In groups 1 and 2, 2 fill-volumes were delivered to each subject; 1 mL 5,000 µg/mL salbutamol respirable solution used as it is or diluted to a total of 2 mL using normal saline. In groups 3 and 4, 1 mL 5,000 µg/mL salbutamol respirable solution diluted to 2 mL total volume using normal saline was delivered to each subject with and without humidification. Unchanged salbutamol in urine at 30 min (USAL0.5) and in pooled urine at 24 h (USAL24) was determined. On day 2, the ex vivo study was carried out on subjects using the same experimental setting with a filter placed proximal to their face mask for collection of total inhaled dose of salbutamol (aerosol emitted). RESULTS: The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered higher USAL0.5, USAL24, and aerosol emitted compared to the jet nebulizer at all fill volumes and humidification conditions (P < .001). Increasing fill volume from 1 mL to 2 mL resulted in a significant increase in USAL0.5, USAL24, and aerosol emitted from the jet nebulizer (P < .05) with an insignificant effect on the vibrating mesh nebulizer. A 2-mL fill volume with the jet nebulizer delivered USAL24 and aerosol emitted comparable to those of 1 mL with the vibrating mesh nebulizer with significantly longer nebulization times (P < .001). Humidification had an insignificant effect on aerosol delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the fill volume of a jet nebulizer is essential to increase the amount of inhaled medication reaching a subject. In contrast, there is no need to increase fill volumes when using a vibrating mesh nebulizer. There is no need to switch off the humidifier while delivering aerosol through a single-limb NIV circuit.