Influence of Small-Scale Irrigation on Livelihoods of Rural Farm Households in the Case of Legehida District, Ethiopia.

Irrigation development, particularly small-scale irrigation, is one of the most important projects for improving agricultural productivity in a country's rural communities. The extent to which small-scale irrigation has improved household livelihoods in Ethiopia's rural areas is not widely recognized. As a result, research on the influence of small-scale irrigation on farmers' livelihoods in the Legehida district will be sought. The study took a "with" and "without" strategy, comparing farmers who used irrigation against those who did not. For analysis, both quantitative and qualitative data were employed. The survey's respondents were chosen using a random sample approach from both irrigation users and nonuser households. Quantitative data for the study were collected from randomly selected 241 farm households, of which 113 were users and 128 were nonusers, using a semistructured questionnaire. Accordingly, the propensity score matching model was employed to examine the impacts of small-scale irrigation on farmers' livelihoods. The logit model result indicates that cultivated land size, off-farm income, education level, family size, dependency ratio, total livestock unit, and distance to the nearest agricultural extension office/FTC are determinant factors in determining whether to practice irrigation when other factors remain constant. The impact of irrigation on a household's income and food security (in terms of daily calorie intake) was evaluated using a propensity score matching model. The result shows that a positive and significant impact on farmers who use small-scale irrigation has increased the daily calorie intake and annual income of households by 244.162 kilocalories and 5234.258 ETB, respectively, as compared to nonirrigation users. This shows that households that participate in small-scale irrigation activities have a higher annual income and food security status than comparable groups. In general, the study recommends that to reduce food insecurity and the socioeconomic problems of rural households, irrigation farming is one of the viable solutions; therefore, the government and nongovernmental organizations should extensively focus on the enhancement of small-scale irrigation infrastructure, policies, strategies, and extension services to increase productivity, income, and livelihood improvement in rural households.

Influence of deficit irrigation levels on agronomic performance of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under drip at alage, central rift valley of Ethiopia.

Water scarcity is one of the most significant constraints on agricultural production in the world, notably in Ethiopia. In the location where this study was conducted, production is only possible once a year. To make the most use of available water, effective water application technologies must be used, and the feasibility of producing crops in water-stressed scenarios must also be researched. In areas of water shortage, deficit irrigation was an essential approach for raising water production and improving water use efficiency. For this purpose, a field experiment was carried out at Alage ATVET College in Ethiopia's Central Rift Valley during the 2019/20 dry season. The regularly grown cash crop pepper was chosen for experimentation under drip irrigation. The study aimed were to investigate the influence of deficit irrigation levels on agronomic performance and water productivity. Seven deficit levels (DI) namely 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10 and 0% were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications by using drip irrigation. Water application was used in all deficit levels by managing the demand side. Full irrigation produced the maximum plant height, branch number, fruit weight per plant, fruit diameter, fruit length, marketable and total yield. However, at 20% DI levels, stem diameter, flower and fruit number per plant increased. There were only significant variations in total dry yield at 50% and 60% deficiency levels. Marketable yield was significantly different across all deficit levels. It was not possible to determine the water stress threshold level of pepper due to the large variation in yield, but at 30% DI, the yield reduction was about one-quarter of the 0% deficiency level by withholding 33.4% water. CWUE was significantly different at all deficit levels, demonstrating that as stress levels rise, so does CWUE. IWUE exhibited significant difference only at 0 and10% DI. As a result, it is possible to conclude that using at 30% deficit by withholding 33.4% of water can be used to optimize the yield and water productivity of pepper production at Alage and other areas with comparable agro-ecology.