The Biomechanics Research and Innovation Challenge: Development, Implementation, Uptake, and Reflections on the Inaugural Program.

Biomechanics as a discipline is ideally placed to increase awareness and participation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. A nationwide Biomechanics and Research Innovation Challenge (BRInC) centered on mentoring and role modeling was developed to engage high school girls (mentees) and early-mid-career women (mentors) in the field of biomechanics through the completion of a 100-day research and/or innovation project. This manuscript describes the development, implementation, and uptake of the inaugural BRInC program and synthesizes the research and innovation projects undertaken, providing a framework for adoption of this program within the global biomechanics community. Eighty-seven high school girls in years 9 and 10 (age range: 14-16 y) were mentored in teams (n = 17) by women in biomechanics (n = 24). Using a design thinking approach, teams generated solutions to biomechanics-based problem(s)/research question(s). Eight key reflections on program strengths, as well as areas for improvement and planned changes for future iterations of the BRInC program, are outlined. These key reflections highlight the innovation, impact, and scalability of the program; the importance of a program framework and effective communication tools; and implementation of strategies to sustain the program as well as the importance of diversity and building a sense of community.

The feasibility, validity, and reliability of strain measures in the iliotibial band during isolated muscular contractions.

The iliotibial band (ITB) is a unique anatomical structure that transmits forces from two in-series muscles across the lateral knee. Little is known about how force is transmitted, via ITB strain, in response to muscle activation. We have developed a technique to measure the strain through the distal ITB during isolated contractions of the tensor fascia latae (TFL) muscle, using a Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi ultrasound image tracking algorithm. Here we report: 1) the validity of this method to track ITB tissue displacement; 2) the reliability of tracking ITB strain across multiple contractions (intra-probe placement), tracking attempts (intra-operator), data collection sessions (inter-probe placement), and tracking operators (inter-operator); and 3) the feasibility of this approach to assess differences in strain produced during different TFL contraction levels. Our method was valid for tracking ITB displacement and could be used to determine tissue strain due to isolated muscle contraction. Our method was most reliable when a single operator tracked trials without replacing the ultrasound transducer and when averaging across multiple stimulations. Our method was also able to detect changes in ITB strains resulting from differing levels of muscle activation. In the future, this method could be used to assess how factors like posture and ITB region affect the strain found in the distal ITB.

A comparison of centre of pressure behaviour and ground reaction force magnitudes when individuals walk overground and on an instrumented treadmill.

BACKGROUND: Instrumented treadmills facilitate analysis of consecutive strides in ways that typical overground gait data collections cannot. Researchers have quantified differences between joint kinetic measures whilst walking on an instrumented treadmill compared to those walking overground. The reason for such differences has not yet been established. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can we identify the source or sources of these errors by comparing centre of pressure and ground reaction force measurements recorded on a treadmill to those collected overground? METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded while nineteen individuals walked continuously at their self-selected walking speed overground and on a treadmill. Comparisons of the centre of pressure and ground reaction forces were made between the two conditions using 2-tailed paired t-tests and Cohen's d effect size. RESULTS: The results indicated that participants had significantly faster backwards, lateral and medial centre of pressure velocities when walking on a treadmill compared to when they were walking overground. Additionally, participants also had significantly reduced peak propulsive ground reaction forces when walking on a treadmill than walking overground. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that shear forces caused by the belts sliding over the treadmill force platforms affect the centre of pressure during early stance, and the minimal acceleration of a participant's centre of mass during treadmill walking results in reduced propulsive force during late stance. Therefore, care should be taken during studies when comparing kinetic gait variables between overground and treadmill walking.

Self-Selected walking speed increases when individuals are aware of being recorded.

BACKGROUND: Typical gait data collections consist of discrete walking trials where participants are aware when data are being recorded. Anecdotally, some investigators have reported that participants often walk differently between trials or before or after data collection compared to when they know they are being recorded. In addition, walking speed, which affects a number of gait variables, is known to be different when individuals complete discrete and continuous walking trials. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether changes in walking speed occurred as a result of participants being aware, versus unaware that data were being recorded, during both discrete and continuous walking trials. METHODS: Kinematic data were collected for twenty two individuals walking continuous trials or discrete trials, while they were both aware and unaware of being recorded. Comparisons of walking speeds were made between groups (continuous walking; discrete trials) and awareness of being recorded (aware; unaware) using a two way ANOVA. RESULTS: The results indicated that participants walked significantly faster during discrete trials when they were aware that data were being recorded compared to when they were unaware. However, when they walked continuously their walking speed was not affected by their awareness. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that awareness of data collection, and the type of protocol used during data collection, affect an individual's walking speed during gait analysis. Therefore, care should be taken when determining gait analysis protocols where variables are sensitive to walking speeds.

A Comparison of Self-Selected Walking Speeds and Walking Speed Variability When Data Are Collected During Repeated Discrete Trials and During Continuous Walking.

A typical gait analysis data collection consists of a series of discrete trials, where a participant initiates gait, walks through a motion capture volume, and then terminates gait. This is not a normal 'everyday' gait pattern, yet measurements are considered representative of normal walking. However, walking speed, a global descriptor of gait quality that can affect joint kinematics and kinetics, may be different during discrete trials, compared to continuous walking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous walking versus discrete trials on walking speed and walking speed variability. Data were collected for 25 healthy young adults performing 2 walking tasks. The first task represented a typical gait data collection session, where subjects completed repeated trials, beginning from a standstill and walking along a 12-m walkway. The second task was continuous walking along a "figure-of-8" circuit, with 1 section containing the same 12-m walkway. Walking speed was significantly higher during the discrete trials compared to the continuous trials (p < .001), but there were no significant differences in walking speed variability between the conditions. The results suggest that choice of gait protocol may affect results where variables are sensitive to walking speed.