Rationale for a New Classification of Solutes of Interest in Chronic Kidney Disease and Hemodialysis.

A hallmark of chronic kidney disease is the retention of solutes that normally are eliminated by the kidneys. The current classification defines uremic toxins based on molecular weight and protein affinity. The retention of solutes is already detected in the early stages of the disease when patients are pauci-symptomatic or asymptomatic but the role of therapies to retard the loss of kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (e.g., modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors) in reducing uremic toxins is poorly understood. Most of the research evaluating the impact of therapies to lower serum concentrations of those toxic compounds is carried out in patients with kidney failure already undergoing kidney replacement therapy. The removal of those molecules relies in physicochemical mass transfer phenomena, i.e., adsorption, diffusion, and convection. In the past 2 decades, the rise and broad adoption of blood purification strategies with enhanced convective properties, such as high-volume online hemodiafiltration and expanded hemodialysis, considerably amplified the ability to mechanically extract middle molecules (molecular weight >0.5 kDa) from the blood compartment. Nonetheless, the classification of uremic toxins has not evolved in parallel with dialysis advancements. Mounting evidence demonstrates the link between middle molecules with uremic symptoms, cardiovascular and mortality risks. An urgent need for updating the classification exists. Defining the causative relationship between specific solutes and specific clinical outcomes will promote the development of targeted therapies. In parallel, the inclusion of new pertinent dimensions to the classification like the influence of new dialysis membranes, sorbents, and intestinal chelators in the concentration of uremic toxins would improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease, setting the pace for future research in nephrology.

Medium Cutoff Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis Membranes and Clinical Outcomes: A Cohort Study Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting.

Rationale & Objective: This study investigated the effects on patients' outcomes of using medium cutoff (MCO) versus high-flux (HF) dialysis membranes. Study Design: A retrospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study. Setting & Participants: Patients aged greater than 18 years receiving hemodialysis at the Baxter Renal Care Services dialysis network in Colombia. The inception of the cohort occurred from September 1, 2017, to November 30, 2017, with follow-up to November 30, 2019. Exposure: The patients were divided into 2 cohorts according to the dialyzer used at the inception: (1) MCO membrane or (2) HF membrane. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were the hospitalization rate from any cause and hospitalization days per patient-year. Secondary outcomes were acute cardiovascular events and mortality rates from any cause and secondary to cardiovascular causes. Laboratory parameters were assessed throughout the 2-year follow-up period. Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics were used to report population characteristics. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to each group before analysis. All categorical variables were compared using Pearson's χ2 test, and continuous variables were analyzed with the t test. Baseline differences between groups with a value of >10% were considered clinically meaningful. Laboratory variables were measured at 5 consecutive time points. A between-patient effect was analyzed using a split-plot factorial analysis of variance. Results: The analysis included 1,098 patients, of whom 564 (51.3%) were dialyzed with MCO membranes and 534 (48.7%) with HF membranes. Patients receiving hemodialysis with MCO membranes had a lower all-cause hospitalization incidence rate (IR) per patient-year (IR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-1.03) than those receiving hemodialysis with HF membranes (IR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.30), corresponding to a significant incident rate ratio (MCO/HF) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.99; P = 0.04). The frequency of nonfatal cardiovascular events showed statistical significance, with a lower incidence in the MCO group (incident rate ratio = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96; P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences in all-cause time until death were observed (P = 0.48). Albumin levels were similar between the 2 dialyzer cohorts. Limitations: Despite the robust statistical analysis, there remains the possibility that unmeasured variables may still generate residual imbalance and, therefore, skew the results. Conclusions: The incidences of hospitalization and cardiovascular events in patients receiving hemodialysis were lower when dialyzed with MCO membranes than HF membranes. A randomized controlled trial would be desirable to confirm these results. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov, ISRCTN12403265.

Classification of Uremic Toxins and Their Role in Kidney Failure.

Advances in our understanding of uremic retention solutes, and improvements in hemodialysis membranes and other techniques designed to remove uremic retention solutes, offer opportunities to readdress the definition and classification of uremic toxins. A consensus conference was held to develop recommendations for an updated definition and classification scheme on the basis of a holistic approach that incorporates physicochemical characteristics and dialytic removal patterns of uremic retention solutes and their linkage to clinical symptoms and outcomes. The major focus is on the removal of uremic retention solutes by hemodialysis. The identification of representative biomarkers for different classes of uremic retention solutes and their correlation to clinical symptoms and outcomes may facilitate personalized and targeted dialysis prescriptions to improve quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Recommendations for areas of future research were also formulated, aimed at improving understanding of uremic solutes and improving outcomes in patients with CKD.

Effect of a medium cut-off dialyzer on protein-bound uremic toxins and mineral metabolism markers in patients on hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) with medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers may expand molecular clearance, predominantly larger middle molecules (molecular weight 25-60 kDa). However, the impact of MCO dialyzers on long-term clearance of various other components of the uremic milieu is unknown. The tRial Evaluating Mid cut-Off Value membrane clearance of Albumin and Light chains in HemoDialysis patients (REMOVAL-HD) provided an opportunity to assess the effect of MCO dialyzers on protein-bound uremic toxins and novel markers of mineral metabolism. METHODS: This exploratory sub-study of REMOVAL-HD evaluated changes in protein-bound solutes (total and free indoxyl sulfate [IS] and p-cresyl sulfate [PCS]) and mineral metabolism markers (intact fibroblast growth factor-23 [iFGF23], fetuin-A and endogenous calciprotein particles [CPP-1 and CPP-2]). Mid-week, pre-HD serum samples were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of MCO use in stable adult patients. Change from baseline to Week 12 and 24 was estimated using linear mixed effects models. FINDINGS: Eighty-nine participants were studied (mean age 67 ± 15 years, 38% female, 51% diabetic, median urine output 200 ml/24 h). Serum iFGF23 was reduced at Week 12 compared to baseline (-26.8% [95%CI -39.7, -11.1], p = 0.001), which was sustained at Week 24 (-21.7% [95%CI -35.7, -4.5], p = 0.012). There was no significant change in serum IS, PCS, fetuin-A, CPP-1, or CPP-2. DISCUSSION: The use of a MCO dialyzer over 24 weeks was associated with a sustained reduction in FGF23, while other measured components of the uremic milieu were not significantly altered. Further studies are required to determine whether FGF23 reduction is associated with improved patient outcomes.

Expanded Hemodialysis and Its Effects on Hospitalizations and Medication Usage: A Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) effectively removes large middle molecular uremic toxins (>25 kDa) while still retaining albumin, potentially reducing their adverse effects. We compare the clinical laboratory parameters, hospitalization rates, and medication use in a cohort of patients switched from high-flux HD to HDx. METHODS: This is a multicenter, observational cohort study of 81 adult patients, across 3 clinics, with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on chronic hemodialysis (HD). Patients received high-flux HD for at least 1 year and then switched to HDx and were followed up for 1 year. Patients were excluded if they discontinued therapy, changed provider, underwent kidney transplant, recovered kidney function, or changed to peritoneal dialysis, another dialyzer, or renal clinic. RESULTS: Twelve months after switching to HDx, the rate of hospitalization events per patient-year decreased from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60-0.98, 61 events) to 0.71 (95% CI: 0.55-0.92, 57 events) (p = 0.6987). The hospital day rate per patient-year was significantly reduced from 5.94 days in the year prior to switching compared with 4.41 days after switching (p = 0.0001). The mean dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (SC epoetin-α) and intravenous iron also significantly decreased (p = 0.0361 and p = 0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Switching to HDx was associated with reductions in hospital day rate and medication use, suggesting HDx has the potential to reduce the burden of ESKD on patients and healthcare systems.

Avoiding acute kidney injury in primary care: attitudes and behaviours of general practitioners and community pharmacists in Hawke's Bay.

INTRODUCTION Awareness of the effect of acute kidney injury on patient outcomes and health systems is growing internationally. New Zealand's approach focuses on stopping consumption of 'at-risk' medicines when acute kidney injury has been established and raising awareness of the risks associated with the Triple Whammy drug combination. AIM To explore current practices and views of Hawke's Bay general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists regarding patient education about medicines with potential for contributing to community-acquired acute kidney injury, with a focus on community pharmacists providing patient education regarding when to temporarily withhold 'at-risk' medicines during acute dehydrating illnesses. METHODS Two tailored cross-sectional online anonymous surveys of GPs and community pharmacists working in Hawke's Bay were administered between 2015 and 2016. Descriptive statistics were generated from the closed-question responses and manifest content analysis was applied to the free-text responses. RESULTS Twenty-two percent (37/167) of GPs and 34% (32/95) of pharmacists responded. Most respondents, GPs (34/37) and pharmacists (25/32), self-reported expertise to educate patients on temporarily withholding 'at-risk' medicines during acute dehydrating illnesses. Twenty-nine (78%) GPs had confidence in pharmacists providing this patient education and 20 (54%) welcomed pharmacist contact regarding a Triple Whammy prescription. However, for a variety of reasons, pharmacists did not routinely provide this education or contact GPs. DISCUSSION Both GPs and community pharmacists reported they had expertise to provide useful patient education about 'at-risk' medicine use during acute dehydrating illnesses. Dialogue to clarify the role of the two groups would be beneficial to achieve a more coordinated approach to patient care. Relevant strategies and frameworks already exist, but national interprofessional leadership and local application would be beneficial.

Demonstrating the value of community pharmacists in New Zealand educating a targeted group of people to temporarily discontinue medicines when they are unwell to reduce the risk of acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) prevention strategies for community-acquired AKI associated with severe acute illness have received attention in recent years. The objective of this study was to evaluate a community pharmacist AKI education programme aimed at patient self-management during acute dehydrating illnesses. METHODS: This was a multimethod study. Potential participants were identified by community pharmacists when they presented a prescription containing a study medicine. The intervention consisted of completion of a short demographic questionnaire and a pharmacist providing verbal AKI information and advice on self-management during acute dehydrating illness, including medicine withholding. This information was supported with take-home information. Participants were telephoned between 4 and 11 months later and invited to participate in a structured telephone interview. Descriptive statistics were generated from questionnaire responses, and interview data were analysed using manifest content analysis. KEY FINDINGS: One hundred and thirteen adults were recruited and 93 (82%) interviewed. Fifty-four (58%) interviewees remembered the pharmacist's education, and 51 (55%) had retained the information sheet. Fifty-eight (62%) would temporarily withhold medicines during acute dehydrating illnesses. Thirty-nine were comfortable they knew when to restart their medicines; 15 (38%) indicated this was once symptom-free for 48 h. Forty-six interviewees were comfortable about contacting their general practice; 16 (35%) would do this after 24 h of illness. Participants found the educational content and pharmacist approach acceptable. CONCLUSION: A majority of participants accepted and remembered the information provided by their community pharmacist and felt comfortable to self-manage during acute dehydrating illness. A caveat is participant actions in practice may not be consistent with stated intentions.

Preventing acute kidney injury: assessing awareness to temporarily discontinue 'at-risk' medicines during acute illness in a New Zealand cohort.

AIM: The objective of this research is to determine community dwelling patients' awareness of temporarily discontinuing medicines during acute illness, and the actions they would undertake when acutely unwell. METHOD: Adults taking long-term oral medicines for chronic health conditions completed a four-question self-completion paper-based questionnaire collecting data requiring quantitative analysis. Recruitment occurred in six participating Hawke's Bay community pharmacies during 2017 and 2018. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty people completed the survey. Seventeen (13%) recalled receiving guidance from a health professional on which medicines to stop during excessive vomiting or diarrhoea. Only three people, however, would stop their medicines. Eighteen percent (17/95) of participants aged 65 years and older were prescribed both a NSAID and either an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB); five reported receiving advice to withhold medicines. Three participants were prescribed a Triple Whammy combination; none reported being advised to withhold medicines. CONCLUSION: A small proportion of the participants recalled receiving guidance to temporarily withhold medicines during acute illness; many indicated the advice would not be followed. The results indicate a degree of acute kidney injury prior (AKI) at-risk prescribing. There are opportunities to empower people to self-manage at-risk medicines during periods of acute illness.

A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Clearance of Vancomycin during Haemodialysis Using Medium Cut-Off Membrane (Theranova) and High-Flux Membranes (Revaclear).

Medium cut-off membrane (MCO) dialysers have been shown to remove a range of middle molecules, which are associated with adverse outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) patients, more effectively than high-flux HD. Vancomycin is widely used in HD patients for treating a variety of infections. To avoid subtherapeutic trough concentrations, it is important to understand vancomycin clearance in patients undergoing HD with the MCO membrane. This open label single centre, cross-over clinical study compared the vancomycin pharmacokinetics in chronic HD patients using MCO membrane (Theranova) and high-flux membrane (Revaclear). Five patients established on chronic HD who were due to receive vancomycin were enrolled. The study used alternating Theranova and Revaclear dialysis membranes over six consecutive sessions. Vancomycin was administered over the last one to two hours of each HD session. The maintenance dose was adjusted based on pre-HD serum concentrations. Over the 210 study samples, vancomycin clearance was higher with MCO-HD compared to high-flux HD but not statistically significant. Median percentage of vancomycin removal at 120 min by MCO membrane was 39% (20.6-51.5%) compared with 34.1% (21.3-48.4%) with high-flux HD. MCO-HD removes a slightly higher percentage of vancomycin at 120 min into dialysis compared to high-flux membrane dialysis in HD patients with infections. Application of vancomycin during the last one to two hours of each dialysis is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations to minimise loss through the dialyser and maintain therapeutic levels.

A tRial Evaluating Mid Cut-Off Value Membrane Clearance of Albumin and Light Chains in HemoDialysis Patients: A Safety Device Study.

BACKGROUND: A new class of dialysis membrane, the mid cut-off (MCO) dialyzer, has been developed to improve the clearance of uremic toxins in hemodialysis (HD). The a tRial Evaluating Mid cut-Off Value membrane clearance of Albumin and Light chains in HemoDialysis patients (REMOVAL-HD) study aimed to determine if regular use of MCO dialyzer was safe and specifically did not result in a significant loss of albumin. METHODS: This investigator initiated, crossover, longitudinal, device study was conducted across 9 centers in Australia and New Zealand (n = 89). Participants had a 4-week wash-in with high-flux HD, followed by 24-week intervention with MCO HD and a subsequent 4-week wash-out with high-flux HD. The primary outcome was change in serum albumin between weeks 4 and 28. Secondary outcomes included trends in serum albumin, changes in kappa- and lambda-free light chains (FLC), 6-min walk test (6MWT), malnutrition inflammation score (MIS), restless legs score and quality of life. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 66 ± 14 years, 62% were men, 45% were anuric, and 51% had -diabetes. There was no reduction in serum albumin following treatment with MCO HD (mean reduction -0.7 g/L, 95% CI -1.5 to 0.1). A sustained, unexplained reduction in serum albumin (>25%) was not observed in any participant. A reduction in FLC was observed 2 weeks into MCO HD (lambda-FLC: Δ -9.1 mg/L, 95% CI -14.4 to -3.7; kappa-FLC: Δ -5.7 mg/L, 95% CI -9.8 to -1.6) and was sustained for the rest of the study intervention. Both FLC increased after the cessation of MCO use. There was no improvement in restless legs symptoms, quality of life, 6MWT or MIS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Regular HD using the MCO dialyzer did not result in a significant fall in serum albumin. There were no effects on quality of life, functional status or nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number (ANZCTRN) 12616000804482.

High cutoff versus high-flux haemodialysis for myeloma cast nephropathy in patients receiving bortezomib-based chemotherapy (EuLITE): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In multiple myeloma, severe acute kidney injury due to myeloma cast nephropathy is caused by pathogenic free light chain immunoglobulin in serum. High cutoff haemodialysis (HCO-HD) can remove large quantities of free light chain immunoglobulin from serum, but its effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain. We therefore aimed to assess whether HCO-HD could increase the frequency of renal recovery in patients with de novo multiple myeloma, severe acute kidney injury, and myeloma cast nephropathy relative to treatment with standard high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD). METHODS: In this open-label, phase 2, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (EuLITE), we recruited patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, biopsy-confirmed cast nephropathy, and acute kidney injury that required dialysis from renal services in 16 hospitals in the UK and Germany. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by random number generation to receive intensive HCO-HD (in sessions lasting 6-8 h) or standard HF-HD and they were stratified by age and centre. Patients and the medical staff treating them were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients received bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone chemotherapy, and were then followed up for 2 years. The primary outcome was independence from dialysis at 90 days after random allocation to groups, which was assessed in an intention-to-treat population. The trial has completed follow-up, and is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN45967602. FINDINGS: Between June 7, 2008, and Sept 18, 2013, we recruited 90 patients, of whom 43 (48%) were randomly assigned to receive HCO-HD and 47 (52%) were randomly assigned to receive HF-HD. All 90 patients were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. One (2%) patient from the HF-HD group withdrew consent before receiving treatment. During treatment, nine (21%) patients from the HCO-HD group and two (4%) patients in the HF-HD group discontinued trial treatment. After 90 days, 24 (56%) patients in the HCO-HD group and 24 (51%) patients in the HF-HD group were independent from dialysis (relative risk 1·09, 95% CI 0·74-1·61; p=0·81). During the 2-year follow-up, 98 serious adverse events were reported in the HCO-HD group and 82 serious adverse events were reported in the HF-HD group. The most common serious adverse events were infections and adverse events related to the cardiovascular and thrombotic and musculoskeletal systems. During the first 90 days, 26 infections were reported in the HCO-HD group and 13 infections were reported in the HF-HD group, including 14 lung infections in the HCO-HD group and three lung infections in the HF-HD group. INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2 study, HCO-HD did not improve clinical outcomes for patients with de novo multiple myeloma and myeloma cast nephropathy who required haemodialysis for acute kidney injury and who received a bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimen relative to those receiving HF-HD. These results do not support proceeding to a phase 3 study for HCO-HD in these patients. FUNDING: Gambro, Janssen, and Binding Site.

The ethics of treating family members.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many medical professionals receive requests from family and friends asking for medical advice and treatment. But should medics treat their family? Ethically can we treat, or refuse to treat, family members? This is a common ethical challenge that most doctors face during their career and there is limited evidence available. By examining ethical principles, we aim to answer these questions and provide a framework that will guide decision making in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a paucity of evidence available. Many ethical systems exist and have been discussed since ancient Greece but in recent years, bioethics has become more prominent in medical thinking and debate. SUMMARY: We examine ethical systems such as virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology and principlism and how they relate to treating family members. We then look at cases in different contexts and describe a system for approaching such cases, allowing doctors to conform to moral standards, and consider ethical arguments, prior to embarking upon any treatment course with a relative.

Large uremic toxins: an unsolved problem in end-stage kidney disease.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on maintenance hemodialysis are subject to a high burden of inflammation and cardiovascular disease, driven at least in part by retention of uremic solutes. Existing dialysis technologies using high-flux membranes offer limited clearance of solutes >15 kDa. New approaches to improve the removal of large uremic toxins include the novel medium cut-off dialysis membranes with pores larger than those in high-flux membranes. These new membranes provide the potential to improve the clearance of large middle molecules up to 50 kDa. In this review, we discuss 18 uremic toxins with molecular weights between 15 and 60 kDa that are retained in ESKD, for which there is evidence of a link to inflammation and/or cardiovascular disease. These include inflammatory proteins, cytokines, adipokines and other signaling proteins. Improved clearance of this group of difficult to remove molecules has the potential to lead to improved outcomes in dialysis patients by reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease, which now needs to be assessed in robust clinical trials.

Exploring the Clinical Relevance of Providing Increased Removal of Large Middle Molecules.

Dialysis technologies have continued to advance over recent decades; however, these advancements have not always been met with improved patient outcomes. In part, the high morbidity and mortality associated with dialysis have been attributed to a group of uremic toxins, which are described as "difficult to remove." With a new generation of hemodialysis membranes now making meaningful clearance of these molecules possible, it is an apt time to review the clinical relevance of these middle molecules. Our review describes the developments in membrane technology that enable the removal of large middle molecules (molecular mass >15 kD) that is limited with high-flux dialysis membranes. Of the known 58 middle molecules, a literature search identified 27 that have molecular mass >15 kD. This group contains cytokines, adipokines, hormones, and other proteins. These molecules are implicated in chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis, structural heart disease, and secondary immunodeficiency in the literature. Single-center safety and efficacy studies have identified that use of these membranes in maintenance dialysis populations is associated with limited loss of albumin and increased clearance of large middle molecules. Larger, robustly conducted, multicenter studies are now evaluating these findings. After completion of these safety and efficacy studies, the perceived clinical benefits of providing clearance of large middle molecules must be assessed in rigorously conducted, randomized clinical studies.

The Association of Serum Free Light Chains With Mortality and Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the associations between polyclonal serum free light chain (sFLC) levels and adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by conducting a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: On December 28, 2016, we searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed) and conference proceedings for studies presenting independent analyses of associations between sFLC levels and mortality or progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with CKD. Study quality was assessed in 5 domains: sample selection, measurement, attrition, reporting, and funding. RESULTS: Five prospective cohort studies were included, judged moderate to good quality, involving 3912 participants in total. In multivariable meta-analyses, sFLC (kappa+lambda) levels were independently associated with mortality (5 studies, 3680 participants; hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.06] per 10 mg/L increase in sFLC levels) and progression to ESRD (3 studies, 1848 participants; HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03] per 10 mg/L increase in sFLC levels). The sFLC values above the upper limit of normal (43.3 mg/L) were independently associated with mortality (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.14-1.85]) and ESRD (HR, 3.25 [95% CI, 1.32-7.99]). CONCLUSION: Higher levels of sFLCs are independently associated with higher risk of mortality and ESRD in patients with CKD. Future work is needed to explore the biological role of sFLCs in adverse outcomes in CKD, and their use in risk stratification.

The Rationale for Expanded Hemodialysis Therapy (HDx).

As dialysis membrane technologies have advanced, the ability to clear increasing numbers of uremic toxins has occurred. To date, however, the class of uremic toxins known as large middle-molecules has been classified as "difficult to remove." Expanded hemodialysis utilizes a new generation of high-retention-onset hemodialysis membranes; these membranes provide the ability to remove large middle-molecules effectively for the first time, without significant albumin loss. In this review, we evaluate the removal of large middle-molecules by the new high-retention-onset membranes, the clinical relevance of these molecules, and how expanded hemodialysis can be prescribed.

The treatment of paraprotein-related kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myeloma kidney and amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis remain the principal kidney complications of paraproteins. In this review, we update readers to many of the recent advances which have occurred in the care and outcomes for patients with these presentations. RECENT FINDINGS: Myeloma kidney has historically caused a severe acute kidney injury with very poor outcomes. The combination of new diagnostic techniques, enabling a rapid diagnosis and novel chemotherapy agents has transformed these poor outcomes for the better. Two multicentre randomized controlled trials have recently evaluated if the removal of free light chains by high cut-off haemodialysis improves renal outcomes beyond effective chemotherapy alone. Although we await the full articles of these studies to be published, abstracts suggested the studies will have contradictory primary results. In the field of AL amyloidosis, there are now novel criteria for the risk stratification of kidney outcomes which can be used in combination with markers of early kidney response to provide clinicians with powerful tools to guide patient discussions. SUMMARY: Across both AL amyloidosis and myeloma kidney patient outcomes continue to improve. Principally this improvement has been driven by the continuing development of novel chemotherapy agents in this field.

Laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS).

Recently, monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) reclassified all monoclonal (M) gammopathies that are associated with the development of a kidney disease but do not meet the definition of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) or malignant lymphoma. The purpose was to distinguish the M gammopathy as the nephrotoxic agent independent from the clonal mass. The diagnosis of MGRS obviously depends on the detection of the M-protein. More importantly, the success of treatment is correlated with the reduction of the M-protein. Therefore, familiarity with the M-protein tests is a must. Protein electrophoresis performed in serum or urine is inexpensive and rapid due to automation. However, poor sensitivity especially with the urine is an issue particularly with the low-level M gammopathy often encountered with MGRS. Immunofixation adds to the sensitivity and specificity but also the cost. Serum free light chain (sFLC) assays have significantly increased the sensitivity of M-protein detection and is relatively inexpensive. It is important to recognize that there is more than one assay on the market and their results are not interchangeable. In addition, in certain diseases, immunofixation is more sensitive than sFLC. Finally, novel techniques with promising results are adding to the ability to identify M-proteins. Using the time of flight method, the use of mass spectrometry of serum samples has been shown to dramatically increase the sensitivity of M-protein detection. In another technique, oligomeric LCs are identified on urinary exosomes amplifying the specificity for the nephrotoxic M-protein.

Patients with multiple myeloma have excellent long-term outcomes after recovery from dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who receive dialysis treatment for acute kidney injury (AKI) due to myeloma cast nephropathy and subsequently recover renal function. METHODS: Patients presenting with dialysis-dependent AKI secondary to myeloma cast nephropathy and subsequently recovering independent renal function between January 2005 and December 2012 were included in this study. Both renal and haematological parameters were collected at multiple time points as part of routine clinic practice. Factors associated with renal function and overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Mean age was 62.1 years; 75% were male and 75% were of White ethnicity. The median OS was 64.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.8-93.3). Twenty-three (95.8%) patients remained dialysis-independent until death or end of follow-up; one patient required further haemodialysis treatment during the follow-up period. The independent determinant of worse OS was a known history of chronic kidney disease (CKD) at presentation. Shorter length of time on haemodialysis and higher percentage reduction in clonal serum FLC at day 21 from baseline predicted better excretory renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this series, the large majority of patients with MM and dialysis-dependent AKI secondary to myeloma cast nephropathy who recovered independent renal function had no requirement for further dialysis. Survival following recovery of renal function is good, and early variables are independently associated with survival and future renal function.