RESUMO
PURPOSE: Previous studies demonstrated that systemic treatment with tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) is protective in in vivo mouse models of retinal degeneration and in culture models of hyperglycemia. This study tested the hypothesis that TUDCA will preserve visual and retinal function in a mouse model of early diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: Adult C57BL/6J mice were treated with streptozotocin (STZ) and made diabetic at 8-10 weeks of age. Control and diabetic mice were treated with vehicle or TUDCA starting 1 or 3 weeks after induction of diabetes, and were assessed bimonthly for visual function via an optomotor response and monthly for retinal function via scotopic electroretinograms. RESULTS: Diabetic mice showed significantly reduced spatial frequency and contrast sensitivity thresholds compared to control mice, while diabetic mice treated early with TUDCA showed preservation at all timepoints. A-wave, b-wave, and oscillatory potential 2 (OP2) amplitudes decreased in diabetic mice. Diabetic mice also exhibited delays in a-wave and OP2-implicit times. Early TUDCA treatment ameliorated a-wave, b-wave, and OP2 deficits. Late TUDCA treatment showed reduced preservation effects compared to early treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Early TUDCA treatment preserved visual function in an STZ-mouse model of Type I diabetes. These data add to a growing body of preclinical research that may support testing whether TUDCA may be an effective early clinical intervention against declining visual function caused by diabetic retinopathy.
RESUMO
Blast-induced traumatic brain injury is the signature injury of modern military conflicts. To more fully understand the effects of blast exposure, we placed rats in different holder configurations, exposed them to blast overpressure, and assessed the degree of eye and brain injury. Anesthetized Long-Evans rats received blast exposures directed at the head (63 kPa, 195 dB-SPL) in either an "open holder" (head and neck exposed; n = 7), or an "enclosed holder" (window for blast exposure to eye; n = 15) and were compared to non-blast exposed (control) rats (n = 22). Outcomes included optomotor response (OMR), electroretinography (ERG), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 2, 4, and 6 months post-blast, and cognitive function (Y-maze) at 3 months. Spatial frequency and contrast sensitivity were reduced in ipsilateral blast-exposed eyes in both holders (p < 0.01), while contralateral eyes showed greater deficits with the enclosed holder (p < 0.05). Thinner retinas (p < 0.001) and reduced ERG a- and b- wave amplitudes (p < 0.05) were observed for both ipsilateral and contralateral eyes with the enclosed, but not the open, holder. Rats in the open holder showed cognitive deficits compared to rats in the enclosed holder (p < 0.05). Overall, the animal holder configuration used in blast exposure studies can significantly affect outcomes. Enclosed holders may cause secondary damage to the contralateral eye by concussive injury or blast wave reflection off the holder wall. Open holders may damage the brain via rapid head movement (contrecoup injury). These results highlight additional factors to be considered when evaluating patients with blast exposure or developing models of blast injury.
