A Contemporary Analysis of Mental Well-being Among Living Donor Kidney Applicants.

Background: Living donation is paramount for expanding the donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess changes over time in self-reported mental health of living donor kidney applicants in efforts to inform patient-centered discussions with potential donors. Methods: Kidney donor applications from 2017 through 2021 were compiled. Data included age, gender, race, ethnicity, applicant-recipient relationship, medical history, and medications. Trends over time were analyzed and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: During the study period, 2479 applicants to the living donor kidney program were evaluated; 73% of applicants were female individuals. More than half of applicants were not related to their intended recipient; this fraction increased from 46% in 2017 to 58% in 2021 (P < 0.01). A similar decline in family relations was not present among Black and Latino applicants. Of all applicants, 18% reported depression and 18% reported anxiety; 20% reported taking antidepressants or anxiolytics. Depression and anxiety increased 170% (P < 0.001) and 136% (P < 0.001) from 2018 to 2019, respectively; antidepressant and anxiolytic use rose 138% (P < 0.001) between 2018 and 2020. Conclusions: The profile of living donor applicants has changed in recent years, with approximately 1 in 5 requiring antidepressants or anxiolytics. Predonation counseling and postdonation monitoring are imperative to decrease adverse psychological outcomes for living donors.

Effect of donor HSD17B13 genotype on patient survival after liver transplant: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Several genetic variants are associated with chronic liver disease. The role of these variants in outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine if donor genotype at risk-associated variants in PNPLA3 (rs738409 C>G, p.I148M) and HSD17B13 (rs72613567 T>TA; rs80182459, p.A192Lfs∗8) influences post-LT survival. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data on 2346 adults who underwent first-time LT between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2020 and who had donor DNA samples available at five large Transplant Immunology Laboratories in Texas, USA, were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Duplicates, patients with insufficient donor DNA for genotyping, those who were <18 years of age at the time of transplant, had had a previous transplant or had missing genotype data were excluded. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival after LT. The association between donor genotype and post-LT survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Findings: Median age of LT recipients was 57 [interquartile range (IQR), 50-62] years; 837 (35.7%) were women; 1362 (58.1%) White, 713 (30.4%) Hispanic, 182 (7.8%) Black/African-American. Median follow-up time was 3.95 years. Post-LT survival was not affected by donor PNPLA3 genotype but was significantly reduced among recipients of livers with two HSD17B13 loss-of-function (LoF) variants compared to those receiving livers with no HSD17B13 LoF alleles (unadjusted one-year survival: 82.6% vs 93.9%, P < 0.0001; five-year survival: 73.1% vs 82.9%, P = 0.0017; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.25; 95% CI, 1.61-3.15 after adjustment for recipient age, sex, and self-reported ethnicity). Excess mortality was restricted to those receiving steroid induction immunosuppression (crude 90-day post-LT mortality, 9.3% [95% CI, 1.9%-16.1%] vs 1.9% [95% CI, 0.9%-2.9%] in recipients of livers with two vs no HSD17B13 LoF alleles, P = 0.0012; age, sex, and ethnicity-adjusted HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.72-4.71, P < 0.0001). No reduction was seen among patients who did not receive steroid induction (90-day mortality 3.1% [95% CI, 0%-7.3%] vs 2% [95% CI, 0.9%-3.1%], P = 0.65; adjusted HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.66-2.08, P = 0.60). Interpretation: Donor HSD17B13 genotype adversely affects post-LT survival in patients receiving steroid induction. Additional studies are required to confirm this association. Funding: The National Institutes of Health and American Society of Transplant Surgeons Collaborative Scientist Grant.

From Patients to Providers: Assessing Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Liver Transplant Practices in the US.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of livers allows for the expansion of the donor pool and minimization of posttransplant complications. Results to date have focused on both donor and recipient outcomes, but there remains potential for NMP to also impact transplant providers. STUDY DESIGN: Using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis file data, adult deceased donors who underwent transplantation between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, were identified. Transplanted livers were divided by preservation methods (static cold storage [SCS] and NMP) and case time (day-reperfusion 8 am to 6 pm ). Patient factors, transplant characteristics, and short-term outcomes were analyzed between Mahalanobis-metric-matched groups. RESULTS: NMP livers represented 742 (1.4%) of 52,132 transplants. NMP donors were more marginal with higher Donor Risk Index scores (1.78 ± 0.50 NMP vs 1.49 ± 0.38 SCS, p < 0.001) and donation after cardiac death frequency (36.9% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001). NMP recipients more often had model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception status (29.9% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001), lower laboratory MELD scores (20.7 ± 9.7 vs 24.3 ± 10.9, p < 0.001), and had been waitlisted longer (111.5 [21.0 to 307.0] vs 60.0 [9.0 to 245.0] days, p < 0.001). One-year graft survival (90.2% vs 91.6%, p = 0.505) was similar between groups, whereas length of stay was lower for NMP recipients (8.0 [6.0 to 14.0] vs 10.0 [6.0 to 16.0], p = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders. Notably, peak case volume occurred at 11 am with NMP livers (vs 9 pm with SCS). Overall, a higher proportion of transplants was performed during daytime hours with NMP (51.5% vs 43.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NMP results in increased use of marginal allografts, which facilitated transplantation in lower laboratory MELD recipients who have been waitlisted longer and often have exception points. Importantly, NMP also appeared to shift peak caseloads from nighttime to daytime, which may have significant effects on the quality of life for the entire liver transplant team.

The effect of an organ procurement organization surgeon on pediatric organ utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Organ procurement organizations (OPO) have started to employ transplant-trained surgeons dedicated to organ procurement with the aim to increase allograft utilization and enhance the use of procured organs. We investigated the effects of an OPO-employed surgeon on the procurement and utilization of organs from pediatric donors within the Southwestern Transplant Alliance OPO. METHODS: OPO data were obtained for all procurements that were performed between 2014 and 2019. The analysis was performed to see if the presence of an OPO donor surgeon impacted the utilization of pediatric livers. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined between allografts procured with the presence of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Present) and those without an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). A p-value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 149 pediatric procurements, 91 included an OPO-donor surgeon. In procurements with OPO-Present, donors were younger (8.2 vs. 11.2, p < .05) and had longer distances to travel to the recipient center (334 vs. 175 miles p < .05), but had comparable cold ischemic times. In terms of organ share type, more OPO-Present livers were shared nationally and there was no difference in discard rate between OPO-Present and OPO-Absent procurements. Finally, OPO-Present livers were more likely to be transplanted to pediatric recipients compared to OPO-Absent (47.3% vs. 24.1% p < .05). CONCLUSION: The presence of an OPO surgeon has impacted organ utilization, leading to increased transplantation of pediatric livers in pediatric recipients, and has expanded the geographical share of pediatric livers.

Biliary atresia and liver transplantation in the United States: A contemporary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biliary atresia (BA) remains the number one indication for paediatric liver transplantation (LT) worldwide but is an uncommon indication for older LT recipients. The impact of recent donor allocation changes, pervasive organ shortage and evolving LT practices on the BA LT population is unknown. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2021 using the UNOS database. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with BA and those with non-BA cholestatic liver disease. Groups were stratified by age, <12 years (allocated via PELD system) and ≥12 years (allocated via MELD system). Waitlist outcomes were compared using competing-risk regression analysis, graft survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling provided adjusted estimates. RESULTS: There were 2754 BA LT waitlist additions and 2206 BA LTs (1937 <12 years [younger], 269 ≥12 years [older]). There were no differences in waitlist mortality between BA and non-BA cholestatic patients. Among BA LT recipients, there were 441 (20.0%) living-donor liver transplantations (LDLT) and 611 (27.7%) split deceased-donor LTs. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher among BA versus non-BA cholestatic patients in the older group (88.3% vs. 79.5%, p < .01) but not younger group (89.3% vs. 89.5%). Among BA LT recipients, improved graft outcomes were associated with LDLT (vs. split LT: HR: 2, 95% CI: 1.03-3.91) and higher transplant volume (volume >100 vs. <40 BA LTs: HR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.87-6.2). CONCLUSION: Liver transplant outcomes among BA patients are excellent, with LDLT and higher transplant centre volume associated with optimal graft outcomes.

Normothermic machine perfusion for older transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients (≥65 years old) are increasingly undergoing liver transplantation and are more likely to be removed from the waitlist. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) holds promise in expanding the number of livers available for transplant and improving outcomes for marginal donors and recipients. We aimed to determine the impact of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients at our institution and nationally using the UNOS database. METHODS: The use of NMP on outcomes in elderly recipients was reviewed using both the UNOS/SRTR database (2016-2022) and institutional data (2018-2020). Characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the NMP and static cold (control) groups within both populations. RESULTS: Nationally, using the UNOS/SRTR database, we identified 165 elderly recipients from 28 centers who received a liver allograft undergoing NMP and 4270 that underwent traditional cold static storage. NMP donors were older (48.3 vs. 43.4 years, p < 0.01), had similar rates of steatosis (8.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.58), were more likely to be from a DCD (41.8% vs 12.3%, p < 0.01), and had a higher donor risk index (DRI; 1.70 vs. 1.60, p < 0.02). NMP recipients had similar age but had a lower MELD score at transplant (17.9 vs. 20.7, p = 0.01). Despite increased marginality of the donor graft, NMP recipients had similar allograft survival and decreased length of stay, even after accounting for recipient characteristics including MELD. Institutional data showed that 10 elderly recipients underwent NMP and 68 underwent cold static storage. At our institution, NMP recipients had a similar length of stay, rates of complications, and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: NMP may mitigate donor risk factors that are relative contraindications for transplantation in elderly liver recipients, increasing the donor pool. The application of NMP in older recipients should be considered.

Use of DCD organs: Expanding the donor pool to increase pediatric transplantation.

The number of children being listed for transplant continues to be greater than the number of available organs. In fact, over the past decade, rates of liver and kidney transplants in pediatric transplantation are essentially unchanged (Am J Transplant. 2020;20:193 and Am J Transplant. 2020;20:20). The use of DCD donors offers a potential solution to organ scarcity; however, the use of DCD organs in pediatric transplantation remains a rare event. Pediatric transplants done using carefully chosen DCD donor organs have shown to have outcomes similar to those seen with the use of donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the utilization of DCD livers and kidneys, outcomes of these allografts, and assess if DCD organs are a viable method to increase organ availability in pediatric transplantation.

Delayed graft function in pediatric living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric recipients of living donor kidneys have a low rate of delayed graft function (DGF). We examined the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of DGF in pediatric patients who received a living donor allograft. METHODS: The STARfile was queried to examine all pediatric patients transplanted with a living donor kidney between 2000 and 2020. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined, as were survival and outcomes. Recipients were stratified into DGF and no DGF groups. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. RESULTS: 6480 pediatric patients received a living donor (LD) kidney transplant during the study period. 269 (4.2%) developed DGF post-transplant. Donors were similar in age, creatinine, and cold ischemia time. Recipients of kidneys with DGF were similar in age, sensitization status and HLA mismatch. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the most common diagnosis in recipients with DGF, and allograft thrombosis was the most common cause of graft loss in this group. Small recipients (weight < 15 kg) were found to have a significantly higher rate of DGF. Length of stay doubled in recipients with DGF, and rejection rates were higher post-transplant. Recipients of LD kidneys who developed DGF had significantly worse 1 year allograft survival (67% vs. 98%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric living donor kidney transplant recipients who experience DGF have significantly poorer allograft survival. Optimizing the donor and recipient matching to avoid compounding risks may allow for better outcomes.

No Stone Left Unturned: Utilization of an Organ Procurement Organization Donor Surgeon at Procurement Reduces Discards of Marginal Liver Allografts.

BACKGROUND: The recent trend of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) employing independent surgeons for organ procurement has been developed with the goal of improving the supply of suitable organs for transplantation. We investigated the effects that the addition of an OPO-employed, organ-procurement specialist has on liver allograft discard rate, marginal organ utilization, and graft survival. METHODS: Organ Procurement and Transplant Network and OPO data were retrospectively studied between April 1, 2014' and July 31, 2019' within the Southwest Transplant Alliance donor service area. Liver procurements with an OPO-surgeon present (OPO-Present) were compared to those without the involvement of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). Donor and recipient characteristics as well as outcomes were analyzed across groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total 869 OPO-Present liver allografts had similar rates of discard (5.2%) compared to 771 OPO-Absent livers (5.8%). However, after adjusting for donor risk, OPO-Present livers had a lower propensity of discard compared to OPO-Absent (3.4% versus 7.6%, P < 0.05). OPO-Present livers were more likely to be shared nationally (11.0% versus 4.8%, P < 0.001). Outcome analysis showed allograft survival of OPO-Present livers at 5 y was comparable to OPO-Absent livers (79.5% versus 80%, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an OPO surgeon was associated with decreased liver allograft discard and increased utilization of marginal donor organs. The OPO surgeon's presence represents a potential strategy to increase organ utilization nationally.

Short-term kidney transplant outcomes from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 lower respiratory tract positive donors.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to assess short-term allograft outcomes following deceased donor kidney transplantation from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) lower respiratory tract (LRT) nucleic acid testing (NAT) positive donors. METHODS: From September to December 2021, SARS-CoV-2 NAT positive organ donors, whose solid abdominal organs were transplanted at our academic medical center were identified. Donors were stratified into having tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in an upper respiratory tract (URT) or LRT sample. For this study, the SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased kidney donors and their respective recipients were examined. Donor and recipient demographic data, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related history, patient outcomes, as well as postoperative graft function were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen SARS-CoV-2 positive deceased donors were identified. Of these, eight were LRT NAT positive and yielded nine kidneys. These allografts were successfully transplanted into vaccinated and unvaccinated recipients. All recipients received standard induction immunosuppression and did not receive any prophylactic therapy for SARS-CoV-2. Two recipients had delayed graft function. At 1-month post-transplant, there was no clinical evidence of donor-derived COVID-19 or graft loss, and all recipients were free from dialysis. CONCLUSION: We describe the first case series of SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased kidney donors for vaccinated and unvaccinated recipients with excellent short-term allograft outcomes and no clinical evidence of donor-derived COVID-19 post-transplantation. Given the increasing prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the population, utilization of SARS-CoV-2 LRT NAT positive deceased donors could be considered an acceptable source of organs for renal transplantation, especially as multi-center experiences and longer-term follow-up emerge.

Normothermic Machine Perfusion in pediatric liver transplantation: A survey of attitudes and barriers.

BACKGROUND: NMP provides a superior strategy for the assessment and preservation of marginal donor livers and has demonstrated increased utilization and enhances organ quality when used in adult liver transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the interest of incorporating the use of NMP in pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was distributed to pediatric transplant surgeons and hepatologists across the United States. Respondent demographic information, attitudes toward NMP in pediatric liver transplantation, and barriers to utilization were examined. RESULTS: Thirty-two providers (18 transplant surgeons and 14 hepatologists) completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 64%. Half (50%) of respondents indicated prior exposure to NMP. Overall, 96% of respondents believed there was benefit to using NMP in pediatric liver transplantation. DCD (68%) and post-cross-clamp (75%) grafts were the greatest opportunity for NMP use. A role in splitting livers ex vivo (71%) was also seen as a potential major opportunity. Cost was perceived as a barrier to implementation (36%), followed by institutional factors (32%). Cost tolerance was significantly greater in respondents residing in OPTN regions with greater than median wait times (63% vs. 11% in OPTN regions with greater vs. shorter wait times, p = .010). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interest within the pediatric liver transplant community for NMP to expand the donor pool. Interest appears particularly strong in regions where wait times for suitable pediatric donors are prolonged.

Liver Transplantation in the Time of a Pandemic: A Widening of the Racial and Socioeconomic Health Care Gap During COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: During the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, organ transplantation was classified a CMS Tier 3b procedure which should not be postponed. The differential impact of the pandemic on access to liver transplantation was assessed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Disparities in organ access and transplant outcomes among vulnerable populations have served as obstacles in liver transplantation. METHODS: Using UNOS STARfile data, adult waitlisted candidates were identified from March 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020 (n = 21,702 pandemic) and March 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019 (n = 22,797 pre-pandemic), and further categorized and analyzed by time periods: March to May (Period 1), June to August (Period 2), and September to November (Period 3). Comparisons between pandemic and pre-pandemic groups included: Minority status, demographics, diagnosis, MELD, insurance type, and transplant center characteristics. Liver transplant centers (n = 113) were divided into tertiles by volume (small, medium, large) for further analyses. Multivariable logistic regression was fitted to assess odds of transplant. Competing risk regression was used to predict probability of removal from the waitlist due to transplantation or death and sickness. Additional temporal analyses were performed to assess changes in outcomes over the course of the pandemic. RESULTS: During Period 1 of the pandemic, Minorities showed greater reduction in both listing (-14% vs -12% Whites), and transplant (-15% vs -7% Whites), despite a higher median MELD at transplant (23 vs 20 Whites, P < 0.001). Of candidates with public insurance, Minorities demonstrated an 18.5% decrease in transplants during Period 1 (vs -8% Whites). Although large programs increased transplants during Period 1, accounting for 61.5% of liver transplants versus 53.4% pre-pandemic (P < 0.001), Minorities constituted significantly fewer transplants at these programs during this time period (27.7% pandemic vs 31.7% pre-pandemic, P = 0.04). Although improvements in disparities in candidate listings, removals, and transplants were observed during Periods 2 and 3, the adjusted odds ratio of transplant for Minorities was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.96, P = 0.001) over the entire pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19's effect on access to liver transplantation has been ubiquitous. However, Minorities, especially those with public insurance, have been disproportionately affected. Importantly, despite the uncertainty and challenges, our systems have remarkable resiliency, as demonstrated by the temporal improvements observed during Periods 2 and 3. As the pandemic persists, and the aftermath ensues, health care systems must consciously strive to identify and equitably serve vulnerable populations.

Making Every Liver Count: Increased Transplant Yield of Donor Livers Through Normothermic Machine Perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) enables optimized ex-vivo preservation of a donor liver in a normal physiologic state. The impact of this emerging technology on donor liver utilization has yet to be assessed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: NMP of the donor liver and ex-vivo enhancement of its function has been envisioned for decades, however only with recent technological advances have devices been suitable for transition to clinical practice. The present study examines the effect NMP on liver utilization in the United States. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify deceased donor livers procured from 2016 to 2019 (n = 30596). Donor livers were divided by preservation method: standard cold-static preservation (COLD, n = 30,368) versus NMP (n = 228). Donor and recipient risk factors, liver disposition, and discard reasons were analyzed. The primary outcome was liver discard rate between 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 4037 livers were discarded. The NMP group had a 3.5% discard rate versus 13.3% in the COLD group (P < 0.001), and this was despite NMP donors being older (47.7 vs 39.5 years, P < 0.0001), more frequently donation after cardiac death (DCD) (18% vs 7%, P < 0.001), and having a greater donor risk index (1.6 vs 1.5, P < 0.05). The most common reasons for liver discard in the COLD group were biopsy findings (38%), DCD warm ischemic time (11%), and prolonged preservation time (10%). Survival analysis, following propensity score matching, found no significant difference in 1-year overall survival between recipients of NMP versus COLD livers. CONCLUSIONS: NMP reduces the discard rate of procured livers despite its use in donors traditionally considered of more marginal quality. NMP maintains excellent graft and patient survival. Broader application of NMP technology holds the potential to generate a significant number of additional liver grafts for transplantation every year, thus greatly reducing the nationwide disparity between supply and demand.

Donation after cardiac death kidneys are suitable for pediatric recipients.

Despite the high number of children listed for kidney transplantation and shortage of deceased organ donors, there is reluctance to utilize DCD kidneys in pediatric recipients. We examined outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant patients who received a DCD kidney allograft. UNOS database was queried to examine outcomes in all pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 1994 to 2017. Pediatric status was defined as <18 years at the time of transplantation. Recipients were divided by DBD or DCD allograft status. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined. Patient and allograft survival was calculated, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. A total of 286 pediatric kidney transplant recipients received a DCD allograft. The donors in the DCD group were significantly younger than those in the DBD group (21.7 vs 23.3 years), with a higher KDPI (26.5% vs 22.9%). In the DCD group, the average age at transplant was younger (11.6 vs 12.9 years), with no difference in cold ischemia time or length of stay between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function were higher in the DCD group, but despite this, there were no significant differences in allograft or patient survival between the groups. There is no difference in allograft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients who receive a DCD kidney allograft. DCD kidney allografts are suitable for transplantation in pediatric patients and can greatly expand the donor pool.

Utilizing increased risk for disease transmission (IRD) kidneys for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to expand numbers of deceased donor kidneys suitable for pediatric recipients are urgently needed to prevent long-term dialysis-associated morbidity and mortality. Donors designated as increased risk of disease transmission (IRD) are infrequently used in pediatric recipients. We examined outcomes of these kidneys in pediatric patients and the potential to increase the donor pool. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database records presence of IRD in all deceased donors since 2004. All pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 2004 to 2017 were identified and stratified by IRD status, and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-three pediatric kidney transplant recipients received an IRD allograft. IRD donors had lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI); were more likely to be younger, male, and Caucasian; and were more likely to have used drugs. IRD kidneys were more likely to have been biopsied and placed on pulsatile perfusion. Other than an older recipient age, demographic data were not different between groups. Allograft and patient survivals were similar, as were rejection and delayed graft function rates. Compared with adult recipients and adult IRD recipients, pediatric recipients were more likely to have a younger donor, receive a kidney with a lower creatinine, and were less likely to have delayed graft function (p < 0.05). There were no recorded disease transmissions in IRD group. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and allograft survivals are similar in IRD and non-IRD kidneys. High-quality IRD organs used in adults represent a large number of donors with excellent outcomes. IRD allografts have a potential to increase transplant volume and should be considered for pediatric patients.

Two-stage liver transplant for ruptured hepatic adenoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Only one case of liver transplantation for hepatic adenoma has previously been reported for patients with rupture and uncontrolled hemorrhage. We present the case of a massive ruptured hepatic adenoma with persistent hemorrhagic shock and toxic liver syndrome which resulted in a two-stage liver transplantation. This is the first case of a two-stage liver transplantation performed for a ruptured hepatic adenoma. CASE SUMMARY: A 23 years old African American female with a history of pre-diabetes and oral contraceptive presented to an outside facility complaining of right-sided chest pain and emesis for one day. She was found to be in hemorrhagic shock due to a massive ruptured hepatic hepatic adenoma. She underwent repeated embolizations with interventional radiology with ongoing hemorrhage and the development of renal failure, hepatic failure, and hemodynamic instability, known as toxic liver syndrome. In the setting of uncontrolled hemorrhage and toxic liver syndrome, a hepatectomy with porto-caval anastomosis was performed with liver transplantation 15 h later. She tolerated the anhepatic stage well, and has done well over one year later. CONCLUSION: When toxic liver syndrome is recognized, liver transplantation with or without hepatectomy should be considered before the patient becomes unstable.

Pediatric Abdominal Organ Transplantation.

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation have become the standard and accepted treatment for children with end-stage renal and liver disease. Since the first successful kidney transplant in 1954 by Dr Joseph Murray and the first liver transplant by Dr Thomas Starzl, the scope of indications for visceral organ transplantation as well as the range of recipient and donor ages has expanded. The first pediatric liver and kidney transplants, simultaneous multivisceral transplants, living-donor and donation-after-cardiac-death organs have evolved rapidly into the standard of care for end-stage renal and liver failure in children.

Should more donation after cardiac death livers be used in pediatric transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: There is a mismatch that exists in donor liver organ supply and demand. DCD livers represents a potential source to increase the number of liver grafts available for use in pediatric recipients; however, there has been hesitancy to use such organs. We evaluated patient and allograft outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients of DCD livers. METHODS: The UNOS database was queried to examine outcomes in all liver transplant recipients from 1993 to 2017. Patients were then divided according to adult and pediatric status, DBD or DCD allograft status, and era of transplant. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined, and patient and allograft survival were calculated. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: A total of 57 pediatric recipients received a DCD liver allograft. DCD recipients were older than DBD recipients. There was no difference in the final PELD score between the groups. There were no differences in causes of allograft failure between the DCD and DBD groups. Importantly, the overall allograft survival in the DCD and DBD groups was similar, as was allograft survival based on era. CONCLUSION: Pediatric liver transplant recipients of DCD allografts have comparable patient and allograft survival when compared to DBD allograft recipients. Use of DCD allografts in the pediatric liver transplant population should be strongly considered to increase the donor organ pool.

Novel Application of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Treatment of Graft-versus-Host Disease Following Liver Transplantation.

A 48-year-old man with hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma underwent liver transplantation. His course was complicated by fever, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and pancytopenia. He developed a diffuse erythematous rash, which progressed to erythroderma. Biopsies of the colon and skin were consistent with acute graft-versus-host disease. Donor-derived lymphocytes were present in the peripheral blood. The patient was treated with corticosteroids and cyclosporine; however, he had minimal response to intensive immunosuppressive therapy. Extracorporeal photopheresis was initiated as a salvage therapy. He had a dramatic response, and his rash, diarrhea, and pancytopenia resolved. He is maintained on minimal immunosuppression 24 months later.