RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a rare, life-threatening condition that can present as a spectrum of nonspecific symptoms, ranging from cough, dyspnea, and hemoptysis to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Perioperative DAH is frequently caused by negative pressure pulmonary edema resulting from acute airway obstruction, such as laryngospasm, although hemorrhage itself is rare. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes an unexpected hemoptysis following monitored anesthesia care for vertebroplasty. A 68-year-old Asian woman, with a compression fracture of the third lumbar vertebra was admitted for vertebroplasty. There were no noticeable events during the procedure. After the procedure, the patient was transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), at which sudden hemoptysis occurred. The suspected airway obstruction may have developed during transfer or immediate arrive in PACU. In postoperative chest x-ray, newly formed perihilar consolidation observed in both lung fields. The patients was transferred to a tertiary medical institution for further evaluation. She diagnosed with DAH for hemoptysis, new pulmonary infiltrates on chest x-ray and anemia. The patient received supportive care and discharged without further events. CONCLUSIONS: Short duration of airway obstruction may cause DAH, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postoperative hemoptysis of unknown etiology.
Assuntos
Anestesia , Pneumopatias , Vertebroplastia , Idoso , Feminino , Hemoptise/etiologia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway (SGA) device with non-inflatable cuff reduce the airway complications associated with cuff hyperinflation. The aim of the study is to determine whether the default setting of Supreme is as effective as the non-inflatable cuff devices. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured and compared between the Supreme and Air-Q, a typical non-inflatable cuff device. We hypothesized that the default setting of Supreme is non-inferior to the the Air-Q self-pressurized (SP) in respect to the oropharyngeal leak pressure. METHODS: Eighty-four patients aged 1 to 7 years who were scheduled for general anesthesia, participated in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to Supreme group (nâ=â41) or Air-Q SP group (nâ=â43). We considered that the primary outcome, oropharyngeal leak pressure of Supreme group would be non-inferior to the Air-Q SP group, within 3âcmH2O. Other outcomes included tidal volume loss, difficulty of insertion, insertion time, and complications. RESULTS: The oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Supreme and Air-Q SP was 19.9â±â4.1âcm H2O and 17.4â±â2.9âcm H2O, respectively. The mean differences of 2 devices (Air-Q SP-Supreme) were -2.5âcm H2O, (95% confidence interval [-4.0 to -0.9], Pâ=â.002). The upper CI was smaller than the non-inferiorty margin (3âcm H2O). This result suggested that the default setting of Supreme was superior to the Air-Q SP with respect to the oropharyngeal leak pressure. However, there were no significant differences in tidal volume loss over time, ease of device insertion score, insertion time, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Supreme can be used in the default setting in pediatric patients accordingly in terms of tolerable leak pressure and the stability for mechanical ventilation compared with Air-Q SP.