RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The present study reports our experience of Copeland shoulder cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (CSRA) and whether glenoid microfracture influences the progression of glenoid erosion. METHODS: One-hundred-and-twelve CSRAs were performed in 101 patients between 2002 and 2007. Eighty-three patients were alive at the median follow-up time of 72 months (range 9 to 121 months; interquartile range 46 to 93 months). Assessment included an Oxford shoulder score (OSS), patient satisfaction score and plain radiographs. RESULTS: The mean (range) OSS was 27 (7 to 48) and 64 of 73 (87.7%) patients were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with their shoulder. Twenty-three (20.5%) shoulders had over 2 mm of glenoid erosion. Microfracture was performed in 43 of 112 shoulders (38.4%) and did not influence the progression of glenoid erosion. Further surgery was performed in 27 (24.1%) shoulders, including 15 revisions, eight arthrolyses and four subacromial decompressions. Revision to total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 14 : 10 for glenoid erosion; one each for loosening, periprosthetic fracture, deep infection, and chronic pain. One was revised to reverse arthroplasty for chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: CSRA performed in an independent centre reproduces the functional outcomes reported by the designer. Glenoid erosion, however, was a common occurrence and the main cause of revision - microfracture did not influence its progression.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain whether routine preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will lead to improved local outcomes after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation (RT) for invasive carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MRI in the planning of the first lumpectomy reduces ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). METHODS: Using a prospective database, 472 initial lumpectomies from 463 women between 1999 and 2005 were examined. All patients had invasive cancer excised to negative margins on BCS, received RT, and were followed. IBTR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between MRI for initial lumpectomies and IBTR outcomes. RESULTS: MRI was performed before 127 (27%) lumpectomies, while 345 (73%) patients did not have a preoperative breast MRI. At median follow-up of 54 months (range 4.8-111.6 months), there was no significant difference in actuarial 8-year IBTR rates between women with preoperative MRI evaluation and women without MRI (1.8% versus 2.5%, respectively; P=0.67). After adjusting for adjuvant therapies, patient, and tumor characteristics, there continued to be no increased risk of IBTR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.7; P=0.60]. MRI visualization of tumors prior to lumpectomy did not influence the achievement of negative margins and was not associated with lower rates of re-excision (MRI: 11.8% versus no-MRI: 13.3%; P=0.50). CONCLUSION: MRI evaluation of invasive carcinoma in the planning of initial lumpectomies was not associated with improved local outcomes after BCS with RT in this cohort of patients.
