A case of primary clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma in a non-cirrhotic liver: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.

The clear cell variant of hepatocellular carcinoma is a rare entity, occurring at a frequency of less than 10% of hepatocellular carcinoma, with a female prevalence and usually associated with hepatitis C and cirrhosis. We reported a case of primary clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma occurring in a non-cirrhotic liver without history of hepatitis. Our examination included gross pathology, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, special stains, and electron microscopy evaluation. The tumor was composed of sheets of medium-to-large cells with foamy and reticulated cytoplasm and small-to-medium sized nuclei with variably prominent nucleoli. Oil red O stain showed abundant intracellular lipid. Periodic Acid-Schiff stain confirmed the presence of abundant glycogen deposition. Immunohistochemically the tumor cells were positive for Hep Par1, negative for epithelial membrane antigen, steroidogenic factor-1, HMB45, melan A, CK7 and CK20. Electron microscopy study was performed, which was first done in a clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma occurring in a non-cirrhotic liver without elevation of liver function tests. Ultrastructural evaluation of the clear cells showed scarce cellular organelles, cytoplasmic lipid vacuoles and swollen mitochondria.

Intron 1 CA dinucleotide repeat polymorphism and mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor and gefitinib responsiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Limited availability of tumoral tissue in non-small-cell lung cancer and presence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-independent responses call for investigation of other molecular predictive marker of gefitinib responsiveness. Therefore, CA repeat polymorphism in intron 1 was analyzed for its association with gefitinib responsiveness together with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in Korean patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 86 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation was analyzed by direct sequencing (exons 18-21) from tumor tissue and CA repeat polymorphism was assessed by fragment length analysis from tumor and/or normal tissue. RESULTS: CA repeat status was identical in 33 patients with matched tumor and normal tissue. CA repeat was low (sum of both alleles < or =37) in 40 (46.5%) and high (sum > or =38) in 46 (53.5%) patients. Although epidermal growth factor receptor mutation was more frequent in high CA repeat patients [17.5% (7/40) in low vs. 28.3% (13/46) in high, P=0.18], response rate was higher in low CA repeat patients [25.0% (10/40) in low vs. 13.0% (6/46) in high, P=0.16]. In multivariate analysis, low CA repeat was associated with better objective response (odds ratio 7.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2-40.8; P=0.029) and time-to-progression (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.88; P=0.014), independent of the epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status. CA repeat status was not associated with epidermal growth factor receptor expression. CONCLUSION: Low number of CA repeats in intron 1 of epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with gefitinib responsiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer patients independent of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

Clinical predictors versus epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in gefitinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors including Asian, female, adenocarcinoma and never-smoker and epidermal growth factor mutation are associated with gefitinib responsiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer. Direct comparison between clinical predictors and EGFR mutation for their predictive power has not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 120 Korean NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib, we have analyzed EGFR mutational status in exons 18, 19 and 21. Patients were grouped according to the number of clinical predictors (female, adenocarcinoma and never-smoker). Response rate (RR), time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate which approach yielded better prediction. RESULTS: RRs according to number of clinical predictors were 0: 3.4%, 1: 17.1%, 2: 29.4% and 3: 33.3% (p=0.002). Patients with gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation showed 61.9% RR compared with 12.1% in the remaining patients (p<0.001). RRs were higher in patients with the EGFR mutations regardless of the number of clinical predictors. In multivariate analysis, gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation showed higher odds ratio of response (9.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-28.7) compared with number of clinical predictors (1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7). Hazard ratio (HR) of TTP was also better in gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation (0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.47) than number of clinical predictors (0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99). Only gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation was associated with improved OS (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.52). CONCLUSION: EGFR mutation should be analyzed whenever possible for effective prediction of objective benefit from gefitinib in NSCLC patients with one or more clinical predictors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations with the response to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents in non-small-cell lung cancer patients has not been investigated. We retrospectively analyzed the associations between response to chemotherapy and molecular markers associated with gefitinib responsiveness including EGFR mutations. METHODS: EGFR (exons 18, 19 and 21) and K-ras mutations (exon 2) were studied by direct sequencing and p-Erk and p-Akt expressions were studied by immunohistochemistry in archival paraffin embedded tissues. Response rate (RR) and time-to-progression (TTP) of prior chemotherapy by platinum, paclitaxel and gemcitabine were analyzed with respect to the presence of EGFR and K-ras mutations, and p-Erk and p-Akt expressions. RESULTS: Of 90 patients investigated, 75 received platinums and 45 received paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy agents. The RRS and TTPS of platinum- and paclitaxel-containing regimens were not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations, nor by p-Erk or p-Akt expression. Fifty-seven patients received gemcitabine as first- or second-line chemotherapy. RR was not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations or by p-Akt expression. However, all responders to gemcitabine exhibited (+) p-Erk expression [RR 30.6% for p-Erk (+) versus 0% for p-Erk (-), P = 0.01]. TTP was not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations or by p-Erk or p-Akt expression. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations did not affect response to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, namely platinums, paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Our results also suggest that it may be undesirable to use gemcitabine in patients with tumors not expressing p-Erk.

Optimization of patient selection for gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer by combined analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, K-ras mutation, and Akt phosphorylation.

PURPOSE: Mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are strongly predictive of gefitinib efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the presence of EGFR mutant nonresponses and nonmutant responses points out the need for more comprehensive analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 69 non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib, we have extended our analysis to EGFR gene copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization, mutations in K-ras, HER2, and exon 20 of EGFR by direct sequencing, and phosphatase and tensin homologue expression by immunohistochemistry, in addition to EGFR exons 18, 19, and 21, and phosphorylations of Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase reported previously. RESULTS: EGFR mutation and high gene copy number were associated with better objective response in univariate analysis. However, only gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation was independently predictive of both response (P = 0.011) and survival (P = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. No patients with K-ras mutation, including two EGFR mutants, showed response. In EGFR nonmutants, patients with either K-ras mutation or p-Akt overexpression exhibited poor response and time-to-progression whereas patients with high gene copy number tended to have better outcomes in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis of time-to-progression in EGFR nonmutants, K-ras mutation or p-Akt overexpression was associated with shorter time-to-progression (P = 0.017). No patient with HER2 mutation showed response to gefitinib. Reduced phosphatase and tensin homologue expression was not associated with gefitinib sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation is the single most important predictor of gefitinib sensitivity. In addition to EGFR mutation, K-ras mutation and Akt phosphorylation aid in better prediction of gefitinib responsiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pre-treatment of donor with 1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin could alleviate early failure of porcine xenograft in a cobra venom factor treated canine recipient.

OBJECTIVE: Unlike cardiac or renal xenotransplants, the depletion of complement using cobra venom factor (CVF) does not improve pulmonary xenograft survival. Several cases suggest that the swine von Willebrand factor (vWF) may play a major role in presenting a different pathogenesis of pulmonary xenograft dysfunction from other organs. To evaluate the role of vWF and the complement system in mediating hyperacute vascular injury of pulmonary xenografts and elucidate pathogenesis of the injury, we performed swine-to-canine orthotropic single lung xenotransplantation after pre-treatment of 1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) and CVF. METHODS: We set up three groups for lung xenotransplantation: group I served as the control group; group II, recipients pre-treated with CVF; group III, donors pre-treated with DDAVP (9 mg/kg, 3 days)/recipients pre-treated with CVF (60 u/kg). Hemodynamic data, coagulation and complement system parameters, and grafted lung pathologies were examined serially for 3h after transplantation. RESULTS: DDAVP infusion reduced the vWF content in swine lung tissue in vivo (7.7+/-2.4 AU/mg vs 16.0+/-5.6 AU/mg, P < 0.0001). Infusion of CVF 24 h prior to transplantation effectively depleted the recipient's serum C3 and complement hemolytic activity below the detectable range. Regardless of the use of CVF, both groups I and II transplanted with unmodified grafts showed an immediate drop in leukocytes and platelet counts after transplantation. However, in group III, in recipients transplanted with DDAVP pre-treated swine lung, the platelet count did not decrease after transplantation (P = 0.0295). The decrease of plasma antithrombin and fibrinogen tended to be attenuated in group III. Light microscopic examination revealed extensive vascular thromboses in both capillary and larger vessels, as well as early pulmonary parenchymal damage in groups I and II, but were rarely observed in group III. CONCLUSIONS: Complement inhibition alone was not enough to alleviate intravascular thrombosis, the main pathology in pulmonary xenotransplantation. Pre-infusion of DDAVP to the donor animal was effective in preventing platelet sequestration and attenuated intravascular thrombosis. It is suggested that the strategies targeting vWF would be promising for successful pulmonary xenotransplantation.

Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and its downstream signaling on response and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with gefitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 90 consecutive NSCLC patients who had received gefitinib, EGFR mutation was analyzed by DNA sequencing of exons 18, 19, 21, and 23 in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain. Expressions of phosphorylated (p) -Akt and p-Erk were determined via immunohistochemistry. Response rate, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival were compared between each group according to EGFR mutation, as well as p-Akt and p-Erk expression. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (18.9%; 95% CI, 10.8 to 27.0) harbored EGFR mutations. These mutations include deletions in exon 19 in seven patients, L858R in six patients, G719A in three patients, and a novel A859T in one patient. Response rate in patients with EGFR mutation was 64.7% (11 of 17 patients; 95% CI, 42.0 to 87.4), in contrast to 13.7% (10 of 73 patients; 95% CI, 5.8 to 21.6) in patients without mutation (P < .001). Moreover, these 17 patients with EGFR mutation had significantly prolonged TTP (21.7 v 1.8 months; P < .001) and overall survival (30.5 v 6.6 months; P < .001) compared with the remaining 73 patients without mutation. Although no significant correlation was detected between EGFR mutation and expressions of p-Akt or p-Erk, p-Akt overexpression was associated with prolonged TTP in patients with EGFR mutation. CONCLUSION: Our data further support the importance of EGFR mutation with regard to gefitinib sensitivity. In addition to its predictive role, EGFR mutation confers significant survival benefits on NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib.

MR imaging findings of uveal leiomyoma: three cases.

Leiomyoma is a rare tumor arising from the uveal tract. Fundoscopically, it appears as a yellowish-white, elevated mass and cannot be readily distinguished from melanoma or other uveal tumors. Cross-sectional imaging may have an important role, particularly when the opaque ocular media or a vitreous hemorrhage precludes a clear ophthalmoscopic view. In this respect, radiologists should be aware of suggestive findings of uveal leiomyoma to avoid an incorrect diagnosis and unnecessary radical surgery. We report MR imaging findings of three cases of uveal leiomyoma.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream molecules as response predictive markers for gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) in chemotherapy-resistant non-small cell lung cancer.

Gefitinib has shown meaningful antitumor activity with tolerable toxicity in chemotherapy-refractory NSCLC in previous studies. Moreover, EGFR expression failed to show a correlation with response. In an attempt to identify predictive markers of response, we have investigated the tumoral expression of key signaling molecules of EGFR (EGFR, p-EGFR, p-Akt, p-Erk, p-STAT3) by immunohistochemistry and analyzed their correlations with response. Of 65 patients who received gefitinib (250 mg/day) for chemotherapy-refractory NSCLC, there were 14 partial responses (21.5%), 21 stable diseases (32.3%) and 21 progressive diseases (32.3%). Median durations of overall survival and time to progression were 6.7 months and 2.8 months, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 34 patients with evaluable tissue specimens. EGFR was overexpressed (2+ or 3+) in 32.4% and p-EGFR was positive in 26.5%. The expressions of p-Akt, p-Erk and p-STAT3 were positive (1+ or 2+) in 50%, 38.2% and 79.4%, respectively. The EGFR expression was not correlated with p-EGFR or the downstream molecules. EGFR or p-EGFR status did not correlate with response. Positive expression of p-Erk was significantly associated with poor response (38.1% in -, 14.3% in 1+, 0% in 2+; p = 0.046). Furthermore, tumors with positive p-Akt and negative p-Erk nuclear expression exhibited the best response (60%), whereas there was no response in the opposite [p-Akt (-), p-Erk (+)] cases. Intense nuclear staining of p-Akt (2+) was associated with prolonged TTP (HR 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.79, p = 0.018) and OS (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.62, p = 0.008). These results support the assumption that gefitinib responsiveness might be predicted by activated EGFR downstream molecules such as p-Akt and p-Erk.

Chorionic plate vessels as an origin of amniotic fluid neutrophils.

The present study was conducted to investigate the potential anatomical source of amniotic fluid neutrophils. Microdissection of neutrophils from the chorioamnion of the fetal membranes and the amnion of the chorionic plates of 10 preterm placentas with acute chorioamnionitis was performed and the genotypes of the neutrophils were compared with those of the mother and fetus using polymerase chain reaction of nine autosomal STR loci. In separate analyses, we reviewed eight cases of fetal autopsies with increased amniotic fluid neutrophils for the presence of neutrophils in the alveoli, and also analyzed the relationship between the amniotic fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and the histological pattern of placental inflammation. The genotypes of all of the neutrophils found in the chorioamnion of the fetal membrane matched those of the mother (n = 10). The genotypes of neutrophils found in the chorionic plate were of mixed maternal and fetal origin (n = 4). In the autopsy series of the fetuses with amniotic fluid WBC (n = 8), only five cases showed neutrophils in the alveolar space, while all the placentas had chorioamnionitis. There was no significant difference in amniotic fluid WBC count between the cases with or without acute membranitis, while among the cases with placental inflammation, those with inflammation of the chorionic plate had a significantly higher amniotic fluid WBC count than both the membranitis-only cases (P < 0.001) and the membranitis and funisitis cases (P < 0.05). These results imply that fetal vasculature at the chorionic plate is the main source of amniotic fluid neutrophils, especially in the cases without funisitis.