RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke requires consistent care, but there is concern over the "weekend effect", whereby a weekend admission results in a poor outcome. Our aim was to determine the impact of weekend admission on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Korea. METHODS: The outcomes of patients admitted on weekdays and weekends were compared by analyzing data from a prospective outcome registry enrolling 1247 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to four neurology training hospitals in South Korea between September 2004 and August 2005. The primary outcome was a poor functional outcome at 3 months, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 3-6. Secondary outcomes were 3-month mortality, use of thrombolysis, complication rate, and length of hospitalization. Shift analysis was also performed to compare overall mRS distributions. RESULTS: On weekends, 334 (26.8%) patients were admitted. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the weekday and weekend groups except for more history of heart disease and shorter admission time in weekend group. Univariate analysis revealed poor functional outcome at 3 months, 3-month mortality, complication rate, and length of hospitalization did not differ between the two groups. In addition, overall mRS distributions were comparable (p=0.865). After adjusting for baseline factors and stroke severity, weekend admission was not associated with poor functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.50). Furthermore, none of secondary endpoints differed between the two groups in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend admission was not associated with poor functional outcome than weekday admission in patients with acute ischemic stroke in this study. The putative weekend effect should be explored further by considering a wider range of hospital settings and hemorrhagic stroke.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Disability-adjusted life years (DALY), incorporating both disability and mortality, has been widely employed to measure regional and global burdens of stroke. Thus far, the DALY lost to stroke in a population has been estimated using only the crude population-level data; no previous study has incorporated refined data from stroke registries. The aim of this study was to integrate the stroke registry data and the population-level incidence data to project the nationwide DALY lost to ischemic stroke. METHODS: from the data of two large ischemic stroke registries, we derived an average daly lost due to ischemic stroke for each of the following age groups: <45, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years. The nationwide ischemic stroke incidence for each age group was extracted from a cardiovascular and cerebrovascular surveillance study that analyzed the 2004 Korean Health Insurance database. RESULTS: The average DALY lost due to ischemic stroke for the age groups <45, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years was 5.07, 4.63, 4.35, 3.88, 2.88, and 1.73, respectively. By multiplying the incidence and the average DALY lost, the nationwide DALY lost was determined to be 9,952 for those <45 years, 24,608 for 45-54 years, 50,682 for 55-64 years, 88,875 for 65-74 years, 52,089 for 75-84 years, and 8,192 for ≥85 years, respectively. The projected nationwide DALY lost due to 64,688 ischemic strokes in 2004 was 234,399 (121,482 for men and 113,244 for women), and the DALY lost per 100,000 person-years was 483 (500 for men and 469 for women). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence data from a population study and DALY values derived from stroke registries can be integrated to provide a more refined projection of the nationwide burden of ischemic stroke. In Korea, more than 230,000 years of healthy life are being lost annually due to ischemic stroke, and hence prompt action is imperative.
