Fibrosis mediastínica post-irradiación: un factor a tener en cuenta en cirugía cardiaca / Post-radiation mediastinal fibrosis: a factor to take into account in cardiac surgery

Resumen La radioterapia mediastínica es uno de los tratamientos fundamentales de las enfermedades malignas torácicas, pero también representa una causa potencial de complicaciones, tanto a corto como a largo plazo. Se presenta una serie de casos de rotura de vena innominada durante esternotomía media en pacientes con fibrosis mediastínica. Los tres casos descritos corresponden a pacientes intervenidos de cirugía cardiaca con antecedentes de radioterapia mediastínica, entre 15-30 años antes de la cirugía, por tres diferentes enfermedades malignas (linfoma de Hodgkin, timoma y cáncer de mama). En los tres casos se reporta rotura de la vena innominada, con desinserción de su origen en la vena cava superior debido a fibrosis mediastínica intensa.

Abstract Although mediastinal radiotherapy is one of the basic treatments of malignant thoracic diseases, it is also a potential cause of short and long-term complications. A series of cases of rupture of the innominate vein during sternotomy are presented in patients with mediastinal fibrosis. The three cases described correspond to patients intervened by cardiac surgery, with a history of mediastinal radiotherapy between 15 to 30 years before the surgery, due to three different malignant diseases (Hodgkin lymphoma, thymoma, and breast cancer). In the three cases, a rupture of the innominate vein is reported; with de-insertion of its origin in the superior vena cava sue to intense mediastinal fibrosis.

Identification of candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting admitted with STEMI and Multivessel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) admitted with STEMI is under debate. CABG is rarely performed, even on ideal candidates. A provisional PCI without stent implantation may allow complete surgical revascularization (CSR) in a subset of patient that we sought to identify in this study. METHODS: Patients with STEMI from April 2014 to October 2016 were evaluated and those with a TIMI flow <3 in the culprit vessel, and an additional stenosis of >70% in an epicardial vessel or sidebranch >2.5 mm were selected. Epidemiological variables, surgical risk scores and SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores were analyzed. All the selected patients were discussed in a post hoc heart-team, and predictors of 12-month events were also analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-two (19.0%) accomplished MVD criteria. Mean SYNTAX was 19 ±â€¯13 points and SYNTAX II score recommended CABG in 12 patients (16.7%) and heart-team discussion in 60 (83.3%). All patients were discussed in a post hoc heart-team, which concluded that 21 (29.2%) patients could have been good candidates for CSR. After one year follow-up, SYNTAX II PCI > 40 was found to be the sole independent predictor for 12-month events (OR 12.9 [2.7-62.1], p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MVD and STEMI with a SYNTAX II PCI > 40 should be discussed in an ad-hoc heart team, after a provisional revascularization of the culprit vessel, and should be considered for CSR, especially when the RCA is the culprit artery and there is a complex disease in the left coronary artery.