Identification of time point to best define 'sub-optimal response' following intravitreal ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema based on real-life data.

PurposeTo determine the average time-point at which it is best to define 'sub-optimal response' after ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the data obtained from real-life clinical practice.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, 322 consecutive treatment naïve eyes with DME were treated with three loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab followed by re-treatment based on decision of the treating physician on a case-by-case basis. The demographic data, clinic-based visual acuity measurements and central subfield thickness (CST) assessed on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated at baseline (month 0), 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months.ResultsOn an average, the improvement in visual acuity and CST was first seen after the loading dose. However, the maximal response in terms of proportion of patients with improvement in visual acuity and/ or CST in this cohort was observed at 12 months. Patients who presented with low visual acuity at baseline (<37 ETDRS letters) were unlikely to attain driving vision with ranibizumab therapy.ConclusionsOn an average, a 'sub-optimal response' after ranibizumab therapy is best defined at month 12 as patients may continue to improve with treatment.

Ranibizumab pretreatment in diabetic vitrectomy: a pilot randomised controlled trial (the RaDiVit study).

PurposeOur aim was to evaluate the impact of intravitreal ranibizumab pretreatment on the outcome of vitrectomy surgery for advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The objective was to determine the feasibility of a subsequent definitive trial and estimate the effect size and variability of the outcome measure.Patients and methodsWe performed a pilot randomised double-masked single-centre clinical trial in 30 participants with tractional retinal detachment associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Seven days prior to vitrectomy surgery, participants were randomly allocated to receive either intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Frimley, UK) or subconjunctival saline (control). The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity 12 weeks following surgery.ResultsAt 12 weeks, the mean (SD) visual acuity was 46.7 (25) ETDRS letters in the control group and 52.6 (21) letters in the ranibizumab group. Mean visual acuity improved by 14 (31) letters in the control group and by 24 (27) letters in the ranibizumab group. We found no difference in the progression of tractional retinal detachment prior to surgery, the duration of surgery, or its technical difficulty. Vitreous cavity haemorrhage persisted at 12 weeks in two of the control group but none of the ranibizumab group.ConclusionRanibizumab pretreatment may improve the outcome of vitrectomy surgery for advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy by reducing the extent of post-operative vitreous cavity haemorrhage. However, the effect size appears to be modest; we calculate that a definitive study to establish a minimally important difference of 5.9 letters at a significance level of P<0.05 would require 348 subjects in each arm.

Influence of baseline diabetic retinopathy status on initial anatomical response of intravitreal ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular oedema.

PurposeIntraocular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels increases with the severity of diabetic retinopathy. Response of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) to ranibizumab is driven by VEGF suppression. We hypothesised that the initial reduction of central macular thickness by ranibizumab should be maximum in severe diabetic retinopathy until the levels of VEGF decreases to the levels observed in eyes with mild retinopathy.MethodsConsecutive patients with centre-involving DMO (central subfield thickness (CSFT)>300 µm) who had three consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections followed by as needed therapy were included. Retinopathy status was graded as mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (G1), moderate to severe NPDR with no prior panretinal photocoagulation (G2), and treated PDR (G3).ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-nine eyes from 204 patients with a mean age of 64.9 years were included. The distribution was 31.4 G1, 32.2 G2, and 36.4% G3. Mean baseline CSFT for all eyes was 458.5±110.8 µm. Baseline CSFT for G1, G2, and G3, respectively, were 437.6±90.9, 472.3±109.8, and 464.7±124.9 µm (P=0.2155). Mean change in CSFT after three consecutive injections was 128.5±116.6 µm. The mean changes were 95.8±101.4 µm for G1, 137.2±112.9 µm for G2, and 148.9±126.9 µm for G3. The changes in CSFT between groups adjusted for baseline CSFT were statistically significant (P=0.0473). At 6 and 12 months after a mean of 4.5 and 7.7 injections, the changes between groups were no longer significant, P=0.4783 and P=0.8271, respectively.ConclusionsThe initial anatomical response of DMO with intravitreal ranibizumab injections was maximum in eyes with treated PDR, suggesting that the higher the VEGF levels, the better the response with ranibizumab.

Determinants of visual acuity outcomes in eyes with neovascular AMD treated with anti-VEGF agents: an instrumental variable analysis of the AURA study.

PurposeTo identify the strongest variable(s) linked with the number of ranibizumab injections and outcomes in AURA, and to identify ways to improve outcomes using this association.MethodsAURA was a large observational study that monitored visual acuity over a 2-year period in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who received ranibizumab injections. Baseline characteristics, resource use, and outcomes were analyzed using an instrumental variable approach and regression analysis.ResultsData were analyzed from 2227 patients enrolled in AURA. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ophthalmoscopy were the most common diagnostic tests used, and this combination was the strongest instrumental variable. Use of OCT and ophthalmoscopy affected the number of injections given and resulted in an increase in visual acuity gains from baseline of 17.6 letters in year 1 and 2.5 letters in year 2. Regression models using the instrumental variable (OCT and ophthalmoscopy combined) showed that ≥5.1 (95% CI: 3.3-11.4) ranibizumab injections were needed to maintain visual acuity from baseline to year 1 and ≥8.3 (95% CI: 5.3-18.8) injections were needed to maintain visual acuity from year 1 to year 2. To gain ≥15 letters, ≥7.9 (95% CI: 5.1-17.5) ranibizumab injections would be needed in year 1 and ≥16.1 (95% CI: 10.3-36.4) injections would be needed over 2 years.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the role that regular monitoring plays in guiding neovascular AMD therapy and they showed that the number of ranibizumab injections needed to maintain visual acuity is higher than that administered in AURA.

A randomized clinical trial comparing fixed vs pro-re-nata dosing of Ozurdex in refractory diabetic macular oedema (OZDRY study).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of 5-monthly fixed dosing vs pro-re-nata (PRN) Ozurdex treatment in patients with refractory diabetic macular oedema (DMO). DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre, randomized active-controlled non-inferiority clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 100 patients who attended Medical Retina Clinics for management of centre-involving refractory DMO. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1 : 1 to either 5-monthly fixed dosing or optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PRN regimen of Ozurdex therapy for DMO. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), macular thickness and morphology, diabetic retinopathy status, number of injections and adverse events from baseline for a period of 12 months.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the difference between arms in change in BCVA from baseline to 12 months. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was five ETDRS letters. Key secondary outcomes included change in PROM scores, change in macular thickness, change in retinopathy and macular morphology, and safety profile. RESULTS: The mean change in BCVA was +1.48 (SD 14.8) in the fixed arm vs -0.17 (SD 13.1) in the PRN arm, with adjusted effect estimate +0.97, 90% confidence interval (-4.01, +5.95), P=0.02 (per protocol analysis). The conclusions of the ITT analysis were primarily supportive, -0.34 (-5.49, 4.81) P=0.07, but sensitive to an alternative assumption on missing data, +0.28 (-4.72, 5.27) P=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The mean change in BCVA with 5-monthly fixed dosing of Ozurdex was non-inferior to OCT-guided PRN Ozurdex therapy for refractory DMO based on a per protocol analysis.

Diabetic retinopathy: pathogenesis, clinical grading, management and future developments.

Decades of research into the pathophysiology and management of diabetic retinopathy have revolutionized our understanding of the disease process. Diabetic retinopathy is now more accurately defined as a neurovascular rather than a microvascular disease as neurodegenerative disease precedes and coexists with microvascular changes. However, the complexities of the pathways involved in different stages of disease severity continue to remain a challenging issue for drug discovery. Currently, laser photocoagulation is the mainstay of treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, but is gradually being superseded for diabetic macular oedema. However, it is destructive and at best results in a gradual but modest improvement in vision in the long term. So, diabetic retinopathy remains the most prevalent cause of visual impairment in the working-age population despite established screening programmes, early diagnosis and treatment of the condition. The recent discovery of inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor is revolutionizing the management of diabetic retinopathy, particularly diabetic macular oedema. However, not all patients respond to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, reinforcing the fact that diabetic retinopathy is a multifactorial disease. Studies are still required to improve our understanding of how retinal structure correlates with visual function. It is hoped that these will lead to better characterization of the disease phenotype based on treatment responses to different agents and allow an algorithm to be developed that will guide the management of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema at different stages of severity.

Intravitreal pegaptanib sodium for choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age-related macular degeneration: Pan-European experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) who were treated with pegaptanib sodium in European clinical ophthalmology practices. METHODS: Thirteen centres in eight European countries participated in this retrospective study. Medical records for patients with any angiographic subtype of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation secondary to NV-AMD with visual acuities (study eye) of 20/40-20/320 treated with 0.3 mg pegaptanib as first-line treatment and with at least 24 weeks of follow-up were identified. Anonymised data reflecting at least 24 and up to 54 weeks of follow-up were recorded. Primary end points were visual acuity outcomes at weeks 24 and 54 compared with those reported at week 54 in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularisation (VISION) trial. RESULTS: In all, 253 patients were followed for at least 24 weeks; 62 patients completed 54 weeks of follow-up. A mean of 4.4 (SD, 1.8) pegaptanib injections were administered through 24 weeks. Compared with the VISION trial, the European experience showed that >90% of patients in the current cohort lost <15 letters from baseline at both time points compared with 70% in the VISION trial at 54 weeks. Pegaptanib was well tolerated with no reported cases of endophthalmitis, traumatic cataract, or iatrogenic retinal detachment. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaptanib was found to stabilise vision in a greater percentage of patients and produced greater overall visual improvement in this group of treatment-naive patients with NV-AMD compared with outcomes reported in the VISION trial; however, interpretation of these results should be tempered given the differences in design between this retrospective study and the prospective controlled trial.

Intravitreal triamcinolone versus laser photocoagulation for persistent diabetic macular oedema.

AIM: To determine if repeated intravitreal triamcinolone improves best corrected visual acuity at 1 year compared with conventional laser therapy for persistent diabetic macular oedema. METHODS: 88 eyes with persistent clinically significant macular oedema, after at least one prior laser photocoagulation, were included in this prospective randomised controlled trial. 43 patients were randomised to 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone (TA) and 45 to laser photocoagulation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who improved by 15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at 12 months in TA versus laser groups. Secondary endpoints were the change in mean best corrected visual acuity, difference in macular thickness and macular volume and adverse event reporting in particular elevated intraocular pressure at 12 months. RESULTS: Improvement in > or =15 ETDRS letters occurred in two of 42 patients in the TA group (4.8%) and in five of 41 (12.2%) patients in the laser group (p = 0.265). At baseline, the mean ETDRS scores at baseline were 54.4 letters in the TA group and 53.0 letters in the laser group. At 12 months, these were 54.5 and 54.6, respectively. Optical coherence tomography showed a reduction in central macular thickness of 82.0 microm with TA and 62.3 microm with laser at 12 months. There was one case of sterile endophthalmitis. 22 out of 43 patients in the triamcinolone group required ocular antihypertensives. CONCLUSION: This study did not show a benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone over conventional laser therapy for patients with chronic diabetic macular oedema.

Concentration of haemodynamic and inflammatory related cytokines in diabetic retinopathy.

AIM: There are changes in blood flow during the clinical stages of diabetic retinopathy with increasing leukostasis and secondary elaboration of cytokines. This study evaluated the vitreous concentrations of haemodynamic-related (endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO)), inflammatory and anti-inflammatory (interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1 Ra) cytokines in the diabetic patients (with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR)), compared them with those of control patients (full thickness macular hole, FTMH) and correlated to macular structural indices. METHOD: Vitreous samples from five FTMH patients representing normal controls were analysed together with the vitreous samples of 15 patients with NPDR and five with PDR. The vitreous concentrations of nitrite (total NO), ET-1, and prostacyclin was determined using ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A sandwich luminescent immunoassay technique was used to determine IL-1beta and IL-1 Ra concentrations. RESULTS: In the different clinical groups, there were no differences in the vitreous NO and prostacyclin concentrations. In NPDR, the median ET-1 concentration (0.7 pg/ml SD +/-0.8 pg/ml) was significantly reduced (P<0.05), compared to PDR (6.35 pg/ml SD +/-0.6 pg/ml) and FTMH (3.6 pg/ml SD +/-0.14 pg/ml). Its concentration also positively correlated with foveal thickness and macular volume (P<0.05) in patients with NPDR and macular oedema. IL-1 beta was detected in PDR, and diabetic patients demonstrated a lower concentration of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 Ra. CONCLUSION: Reduced concentrations of ET-1 in NPDR may reflect the haemodynamic changes of NPDR. The IL-1 Ra concentration suggests a change in the anti-inflammatory environment of the diabetic retina.

Diabetic cataract removal: postoperative progression of maculopathy--growth factor and clinical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic cataract extraction can be frequently complicated by macular oedema, progression of retinopathy, or development of iris neovascularisation. The pathogenesis of these complications may be the result of changes in the concentration of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic cytokines in the immediate postoperative period. The study aims to prospectively analyse this. METHODS: Uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant was performed in seven eyes of six patients with diabetic retinopathy ranging from severe non-proliferative to quiescent proliferative. Patients were reviewed 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery with fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and aqueous sampling. Each sample was analysed for VEGF, HGF, Il-1 beta (pg/ml), and PEDF (microg/ml) by sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: Clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO) occurred in one patient although increased macular hyperfluorescence occurred in three patients on FFA at 1 month. VEGF 165 concentration increased 1 day after surgery from a median baseline of 68 pg/ml (range 22-87 pg/ml) to 723 pg/ml (range 336-2071) at day 1. By 1 month it had decreased to 179 (range 66-811 pg/ml). HGF concentrations steadily increased over the month while IL-1 beta and PEDF concentrations demonstrated an acute rise on day 1 after surgery and then IL-1beta returned to baseline concentrations while PEDF decreased to below baseline. CONCLUSION: These results confirm altered concentrations of angiogenic and antiangiogenic growth factors after cataract surgery, which may induce subclinical and clinical worsening of diabetic maculopathy.

Reported symptoms and quality-of-life impacts in patients having laser treatment for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

AIMS: To explore the patient experience of symptoms of eye disease related to diabetes and its treatment, including increase of symptoms over time and their relation to severity of the condition and the effect of multiple treatments and symptoms on quality of life. METHODS: A qualitative interview study was implemented at four eye clinics in the UK. This study design was intended to yield 240 interviews in patients having their first laser treatment or first follow-up and in multi-treatment patients with a clinically documented loss of visual function in at least one eye (VA

Diabetic macular oedema: pilot randomised trial of pars plana vitrectomy vs macular argon photocoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Focal macular photocoagulation for clinically significant macular oedema (CSME) is the proven method for treatment of this condition, but with little chance of visual improvement. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) may produce resolution of macular oedema and improvement in visual acuity. However, there have been no randomised trials to ascertain role of vitrectomy in the management of persistent CSME. METHODS: Patients with persistent CSME despite previous macular photocoagulation and Snellen visual acuity 6/15 to 6/60 were recruited. Dilated fundoscopy, best-corrected visual acuity including Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) vision, ocular coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) at baseline and up to 12 months post-treatment was performed. Exclusion criteria were signs of posterior vitreous detachment, macular traction or the taut posterior hyaloid face syndrome, or macular ischaemia on FFA. In all, 20 patients were randomised (10 in each arm) to either standard macular photocoagulation or PPV and removal of the posterior hyaloid face. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients recruited, seven patients completed the protocol in the vitrectomy and eight in the laser arms, respectively. There was little evidence of any difference in the foveal thickness at 12 months between the two treatment arms despite a gradual improvement. Only one patient, from the vitrectomy arm, suffered moderate visual loss (defined as loss of 15 ETDRS letters) (our primary outcome). DISCUSSION: In this pilot RCT, standard PPV provides little visual benefit compared to macular photocoagulation, but a larger definitive study is required to confirm this early appraisal.

Pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic macular oedema: OCT and functional correlations.

PURPOSE: A prospective study to evaluate the macular structural and functional effects of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for persistent diffuse clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO). METHOD: A total of 12 patients with persistent diffuse CSMO were recruited and underwent assessment including best-corrected visual acuity, fundus fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fine matrix mapping (FMM) at baseline and over a period of a year poststandard three-port PPV. RESULTS: The median baseline ETDRS letters score for all 12 patients was 52 (range 41-63) while at 12 months it had increased to 65 (range of 27-68), an improvement of two complete ETDRS lines (P=0.037). Similarly, there was an improvement in the perifoveal cone thresholds (P=0.02). The foveal thickening for all 12 patients ranged from a median of 183 to 751 microm (normal range 126-180 microm) and the macular volume ranged from a median of 2.13 to 6.42 mm(3) (normal <1.66 mm(3)). After surgery, both the median foveal thickness (from 334 to 280 microm) and median macular volume (from 3.24 to 2.61 mm(3)) demonstrated decreases over 12 months (P=0.01). On baseline OCT, the patients fell into two anatomically distinct groups: Group 1 (n=4) had a dome-shaped thickened macula with a partial posterior hyaloid separation and a significantly higher foveal thickness and macular volume than Group 2 (n=8) which had a diffuse low-elevation profile of the thickened macula (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of PPV for persistent fovea-involving CSMO there was structural and functional improvement.

Unilateral electronegative ERG of non-vascular aetiology.

BACKGROUND: Full field and pattern electroretinograms (ERG, PERG) are performed to assess generalised retinal function and macular function, respectively. An (electro) negative full field ERG usually describes an ISCEV standard maximal response in which the b-wave is smaller than a normal or minimally reduced a-wave and indicates dysfunction that is post-phototransduction. The most common cause of a unilateral negative ERG is central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) or birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR). This study examines the clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with unilateral negative ERG who do not have CRAO or BCR. METHODS: 12 patients were ascertained with a unilateral negative ERG in whom a vascular aetiology and BCR were excluded. Most presented with symptoms of central retinal dysfunction. In 11 of the 12 patients additional long duration photopic stimuli were used to test cone system ON and OFF responses. RESULTS: All 12 patients had unilateral electronegative bright flash full field ERGs indicating total or relative preservation of rod photoreceptor function, but dysfunction post-phototransduction. Seven of these patients had non-specific inflammatory changes in the eye with the negative ERG. Six patients, including five with inflammatory signs, had involvement of the cone ON response with complete preservation of cone OFF responses. A further three patients showed evidence of cone ON response abnormality with less severe OFF response involvement. CONCLUSION: The ERGs in this heterogeneous group of patients predominantly showed post-phototransduction involvement of the ON pathways. Sparing of the cone OFF response was often observed. The majority of patients had signs of previous inflammation and it is speculated that these highly unusual unilateral changes may be mediated via an autoimmune mechanism.