Cerebral visual impairment-related vision problems in primary school children: a cross-sectional survey.

AIM: To estimate how many children in mainstream primary schools have cerebral visual impairment (CVI)-related vision problems and to investigate whether some indicators might be useful as red flags, if they were associated with increased risk for these problems. METHOD: We conducted a survey of primary school children aged 5 to 11 years, using whether they were getting extra educational help and/or teacher- and parent-reported behaviour questionnaires to identify children at risk for CVI. These and a random 5% sample were assessed for CVI-related vision problems. We compared the usefulness of potential red flags using likelihood ratios. RESULTS: We received questionnaires on 2298 mainstream-educated children and examined 248 children (152 [61%] males, 96 females [39%]; mean age 8y 1mo, SD 20mo, range 5y 6mo-11y 8mo). We identified 78 out of 248 children (31.5% of those examined, 3.4% of the total sample), who had at least one CVI-related vision problem. The majority (88%) were identified by one or more red flag but none were strongly predictive. Fewer than one in five children with any CVI-related vision problem had reduced visual acuity. INTERPRETATION: Children with CVI-related vision problems were more prevalent than has been appreciated. Assessment of at-risk children may be useful so that opportunities to improve outcomes for children with CVI-related vision problems are not missed.

Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study explains the construction and validation of a chart in Hindi language, one of the commonly spoken languages in the world. The new visual acuity chart is called LEA Hindi chart. The calligraphy construction method described here can help develop other such acuity charts. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to construct and validate a new logMAR Hindi visual acuity chart (LEA Hindi chart) using principles similar to that of LEA symbols acuity chart. METHODS: A multicenter (three centers) study was conducted in two phases. The first phase consisted of identifying and constructing the Hindi optotypes using calligraphy techniques. The Hindi optotypes were calibrated against the Landolt C optotypes by measuring the threshold distance for visual acuity. In the second phase, the newly constructed LEA Hindi chart was validated against the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and Landolt C visual acuity charts. Sixty participants were enrolled for the first phase (centers 1 and 2) and for the second phase of the study (centers 1 and 3). Additional 15 participants were enrolled (center 1) for testing repeatability. RESULTS: Four Hindi optotypes were identified and used for the construction of the chart (first phase). In the second phase, the LEA Hindi chart was found to be comparable with both the Landolt C, (logMAR acuity difference, 0.03 ± 0.13; P > .18) and ETDRS (logMAR acuity difference, -0.02 ± 0.09; P > .25) charts. All the three charts were also found to be repeatable (95% limits of agreement within 0.24 logMAR). CONCLUSIONS: The newly constructed LEA Hindi visual acuity chart gave comparable levels of visual acuity as that measured in an ETDRS or Landolt C charts. The repeatability was also similar to the standard charts. The LEA Hindi visual acuity chart can be used for patients comfortable with Hindi language and also in studies requiring multiple measurements of visual acuity, to avoid familiarity to a given chart.

Response to correction of refractive errors and hypoaccommodation in children with congenital Zika syndrome.

PURPOSE: To describe the immediate response to correction of refractive errors and hypoaccommodation in children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). METHODS: Children born between May and December 2015 with a confirmed diagnosis of CZS and enrolled in a multidisciplinary early intervention program were included in this study. All children received a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including dynamic retinoscopy and cycloplegic refraction. Children were prescribed their full correction if they met the criteria for refractive error, and additional plus 3.00 overcorrection for strabismus, accommodative dysfunction, and/or low vision. Monocular and binocular visual responses to Lea Grating Test at 30 cm, with and without eyeglasses, were measured on day 1 of glasses wear. RESULTS: A total of 60 children were evaluated (mean age at evaluation, 11.5 ± 1.1 months; range, 9.0-16.0 months). Lea Grating Test responses were abnormal in all children prior to spectacle correction. Hypoaccommodation was present in 17 of 21 children (81%). Overcorrection was prescribed for all children. Visual responses were subnormal even with glasses use; however, immediate improvement in binocular vision was found in 37 children (62%) and in 74 of 119 eyes (62.2%). For the monocular visual improvement, 27 of 115 eyes (23.5%) had structural abnormalities, and 44 of 115 eyes (38.3%) were structurally normal. There was a statistical difference between the cycloplegic refraction of the children in August and in November, including emmetropia (P = 0.001), hyperopia (P = 0.000), myopia (P = 0.007), and astigmatism (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Eyeglasses can improve visual acuity in children with CZS. Significant changes in their refractive status over time requires periodic updates.

Normative data for three tests of visuocognitive function in primary school children: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is an increasing recognition that visuocognitive difficulties occur in children with neurodevelopmental problems. We obtained normative data for the performance of primary school children using three tests of visuocognitive function that are practicable in a clinical setting. METHODS: We tested 214 children aged between 4 and 11 years without known developmental problems, using tests to assess (1) orientation recognition and adaptive movement (postbox task), (2) object recognition (rectangles task) and (3) spatial integration (contours task). RESULTS: 96% could do the postbox task with ease-only 4% (all aged <9 years) exhibited minor difficulties. Errors in the rectangles task decreased with age: 33% of children aged 4-5 years had major difficulties but >99% of children aged ≥6 years had no, or minor, difficulties. Median scores for the contours task improved with age, and after age 8 years, 99% could see the contour using long-range spatial integration rather than density. CONCLUSIONS: These different aspects of children's visuocognitive performance were testable in a field setting. The data provide a benchmark by which to judge performance of children with neurodevelopmental problems and may be useful in assessment with a view to providing effective supportive strategies for children whose visuocognitive skills are lower than the expectation for their age.

Current Understanding of What Infants See.

The current understanding of what infants see varies greatly among healthcare and education specialists. Even among ophthalmologists and pediatric neurologists in charge of clinical examinations of infants, opinions vary on what infants perceive, recognize, and use for communication and learning. It is, therefore, of interest to review publications from several specialties to learn whether new information is available on the development of visual functions and use of vision. Ten percent of total publications on this subject are reviewed here based on the usefulness of their content for improving early diagnosis and intervention of vision disorders in infants.

Profile of visual functioning as a bridge between education and medicine in the assessment of impaired vision.

PURPOSE: To report on the development of the Profile of Visual Functioning as a framework for information exchange between schools and medical specialists involved in the education or care of children with impaired vision due to brain damage. METHODS: The role of vision loss in a child's functioning can be in part assessed by medical services, but in order to meet the needs of early intervention and education, numerous activities and tasks need to be observed during therapies, early intervention activities, and at local and special schools. RESULT: Information on vision loss can be gathered effectively and shared between medicine and education using well-structured lists of the most important functions, the Profile of Visual Functioning. We describe a common type of list of vision-related functions and activities. DISCUSSION: Cooperation between education and medicine requires development of a common language and agreements on how the large amount of information is collected. A basic list of measurements and observations covers functions of most children and thus gives a firm structure to the information exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Lists of functions to be examined and activities to be observed, if used by all stakeholders, may improve the quality of assessments for early intervention and special education. At the same time, schools and hospitals need to jointly arrange further education so that the names of activities start to make sense to doctors and the medical terms to teachers.

A journey through heart valve surgery.

It is evident that valvular surgeries have made countless advances since the first valve surgery in 1925 when Dr Henry Souttar operated on a woman with mitral stenosis. Patients in the 21st century have a better chance of surviving as a result of these advances. In addition to providing high-quality health care to patients, educating patients and their families regarding the disease processes, symptoms, diagnosis, types of valve surgeries, different approaches, complications, nonsurgical care, recovery, and lifestyle changes is an instrumental component to a successful recovery.

[Update on current care guidelines: appropriate treatment of medical problems associated with Down's syndrome]. / Downin oireyhtymään liittyvien lääketieteellisten ongelmien hyvä hoito.

The lifetime prognosis of people with Down's syndrome has improved. Development of the services that health care and society can offer to such people is ongoing. These guidelines are targeted at defining what is required to further increase the lifespan and quality-of-life of people with Down's syndrome.

Parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast in normal aging and in patients with risk factors for AMD.

BACKGROUND: Patients with early age-related maculopathy (ARM) do not necessarily show obvious morphological signs or functional impairment. Many have good visual acuity, yet complain of decreased visual performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the aging effects on performance of parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast, and defects caused by early ARM and normal fellow eyes of patients with unilateral age-related macular degeneration (nfAMD). METHODS: Testing of the central visual field (8 degrees radius) was performed by the Macular Mapping Test (MMT) using recognition of letters in 40 parafoveal target locations at four contrast levels (5, 10, 25 and 100%). Effects of aging were investigated in 64 healthy subjects aged 23 to 76 years (CTRL). In addition, 39 eyes (minimum visual acuity of 0.63;20/30) from 39 patients with either no visible signs of ARM, while the fellow eye had advanced age-related macular degeneration (nfAMD; n = 12), or early signs of ARM (eARM; n = 27) were examined. Performance was expressed summarily as a "field score" (FS). RESULTS: Performance in the MMT begins to decline linearly with age in normal subjects from the age of 50 and 54 years on, at 5% and 10% contrast respectively. The differentiation between patients and CTRLs was enhanced if FS at 5% was analyzed along with FS at 10% contrast. In 8/12 patients from group nfAMD and in 18/27 from group eARM, the FS was statistically significantly lower than in the CTRL group in at least one of the lower contrast levels. CONCLUSION: Using parafoveal test locations, a recognition task and diminished contrast increases the chance of early detection of functional defects due to eARM or nfAMD and can differentiate them from those due to aging alone.

Documenting fixation at an extrafoveal locus with a modified slit lamp in age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To develop a simple and clinically useful technique for observing fixation at an extrafoveal locus (preferred retinal locus [PRL]) with different targets and texts in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A standard slit lamp was modified by adding several fixation targets in the illumination pathway for direct observation and documentation of fixation during fundus examination. Fixation patterns were analyzed in 30 subjects with AMD. RESULTS: The location and stability of fixation with various stimuli was possible to record in each subject. In 23 subjects, there was no difference between the fixations at star and wagon wheel stimuli; in seven subjects, they were in clearly different retinal locations. Fixation was unstable in three subjects. The PRL for reading words was detectable in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The present assessment technique seems to offer a simple, clinically available technique to record fixation patterns to different targets and texts.

Implications of deafblindness on visual assessment procedures: considerations for audiologists, ophthalmologists, and interpreters.

Visual assessment of deaf persons presents a challenge to the ophthalmologist and the optometrist. At the time they want to measure visual function, the interpreter uses visual communication, competing for the patient's attention. Important rules of good assessment of visual functioning include taking turns and giving the interpreter sufficient time to convey the questions related to each test. This has implications for audiologists working with this population as well. Communication should be tailored to the varying needs of people who may have long-standing deafness and good sign language, may have lost their hearing at an advanced age and have limited or no sign language, or may be young persons or children who have congenital or progressive loss of hearing combined with congenital or progressive vision loss. Individuals with sudden hearing and vision loss, as well as those with intellectual disabilities and limited language, are particularly challenging groups for the assessment of vision and require special communication skills for ophthalmologists and audiologists. The ophthalmologist usually knows the nature of vision changes typical of disorders that the patient has. For the clinical follow-up of a condition, a few measurements are usually taken. For a comprehensive assessment of visual functioning for rehabilitation and education, many more measurements, observations, and questions are needed so that vision for communication, orientation in the environment, and performance of near-vision tasks can be reported and the effects of the environment can be evaluated. Testing should cover ocular disorders and vision loss caused by brain damage.

Driving performance of drivers with impaired central visual field acuity.

This study investigated the performance of drivers with impairment to their central field of vision but with normal peripheral vision, due to retinoschisis, in a safety critical driving tasks. The performance of five male drivers with impaired vision (VA 0.2), aged between 40 and 50 years, all with more than 250,000 km life-time driving experience and a good safety record, and five normal vision controls, matched by gender, age, driving experience and safety record, were tested in 40 km/h city traffic and in a motorway car following situation. All participants displayed appropriate driving ability in city traffic and all were able to detect and respond adequately to a conflicting 'stunt pedestrian' and 'stunt cyclist' situation. There were no apparent differences between the drivers with impaired vision and those with normal vision. In the car following situation, the participants drove at 80 km/h, 50 m behind a lead car, on a 30 km section of motorway in normal traffic. During each trial, the lead car started to decelerate at an average of 0.53 m/s2 while the participant either looked at the car in front (control) or performed a memory and addition task (non-visual attention) while looking at the car in front. The participants were required to press the brake pedal when they noticed a decrease in headway. The participant's brake reaction time to the onset of the lead car's brake lights was also tested. The drivers with impaired vision were significantly slower, by 0.2 s, in detecting the onset of brake lights than the normal vision drivers. Their headway closure detection was 0.7 s slower than normal vision drivers, but this difference was not statistically significant in this small data. In spite of some impairment in car following (central vision task), the results together with the clean record of these drivers with retinoschisis support the idea that visual acuity of 0.5 (the European Union norm) is not a necessary prerequisite for safe driving.