RESUMO
Climate change involves multiple emotional expressions associated with specific labels, notably: 'concern,' 'guilt,' or 'scepticism.' However, there are other types of emotions that have been less analysed, such as 'powerlessness,' 'anger' and 'confusion' that are of equal importance for predicting behavioural changes toward this climatic issue. Likewise, few studies in this research field rely on qualitative data to understand and identify the causative agents for the emotional arousal. This research explores a range of emotions, mixing those that have been widely studied and those that have been hardly analysed. It also looks at the demographic parameters associated with such emotions using a population sample from southern Ecuador. The study analyses quantitative and qualitative data gathered through structured-questionnaires whereby participants were given agency to select and define how they themselves sense emotionally climate change. The results indicate that two of the five participants' most selected emotions are shared with other nations ('concern,' 'guilt'), while the other three have been less reported and studied in the climate change field ('powerlessness,' 'anger,' and 'confusion'). These emotions were found to be aroused by different reasons associated with specific demographic variables. The findings reveal the role of the cultural and local environment in the emotional arousal and its relevance for designing more effective climate communication campaigns.
RESUMO
Resumen Los conflictos entre fauna silvestre y seres humanos constituyen un problema complejo y creciente, principalmente para la conservación de especies involucradas en los mismos. Pese a la existencia de trabajos que analizan esta temática en el neotrópico, aún se evidencian vacíos de conocimiento geográficos y/o temáticos sobre esta disciplina. Ecuador, alberga un importante número de estudios enfocados principalmente en la identificación de las especies involucradas en conflictos. Sin embargo, la costa del país; particularmente los bosques secos del suroccidente han permanecido al margen sobre el tema. Este estudio se desarrolló en las comunidades circunscritas a la Reserva Natural Tumbesia La Ceiba, cantón Zapotillo, al sur de Ecuador. Con el uso de una entrevista semiestructurada, aplicada a los pobladores del sector se logró identificar, categorizar, definir la frecuencia, causas, y actitudes sobre los conflictos con la fauna silvestre del sector. Se identificaron seis tipos de conflictos: cacería, depredación de animales domésticos, destrucción de cultivos, usos medicinales, tráfico de especies y ofidiofobia. Dieciséis especies están involucradas en esta problemática. Puma concolor y Lycalopex sechurae se proponen como las especies más conflictivas. Además, se identificó una respuesta comunitaria organizada para enfrentar los problemas causados por las especies; así como se encontró que los costos causados por ataques de fauna silvestre son significativos, principalmente cuando involucran la pérdida de ganado caprino. Este trabajo provee la línea de base respecto al conocimiento de este campo investigativo para el sur occidente del país y evidencia que la única forma de enfrentar la problemática es establecer formas de colaboración público-privadas.
Abstract Conflicts between wildlife and humans are a complex and growing problem, particularly for the conservation of the species involved in the conflict. Despite the existence of studies analysing this issue in the Neotropics, gaps in geographical and/or thematic knowledge about this discipline remain open. Ecuador is home to an important number of studies focused mainly on the identification of species involved in conflicts. However, the country's coast, particularly the southwest dry forests, has remained untouched by this topic. This study was carried out in the communities surrounding the Tumbesia La Ceiba Natural Reserve, Zapotillo canton, in southern Ecuador. Using a semi-structured interview, applied to local inhabitants, we were able to identify, categorize, and define the frequency, causes, and attitudes towards conflicts with the sector's wildlife. Six types of conflicts were identified: hunting, predation of domestic animals, destruction of crops, medicinal uses, species trafficking, and ofidiophobia. Sixteen species are involved in this problem. Puma concolor and Lycalopex sechurae are proposed as the most conflictive species. In addition, an organized community response was identified to address the problems caused by the species; and the costs caused by wildlife attacks were found to be significant, primarily when they involved the loss of goats. This work provides a baseline of knowledge on this issue for the country's southwest, and shows that the only way to address the problem is to establish public and private partnerships.
RESUMO
For decades, researchers have worried about people's understanding of climate change. Although this understanding varies by cultural context, most studies so far have taken place in industrialised countries. Few studies have explored understandings of climate change in the global South. Through standardised questionnaires and semi-structured interviews conducted in southern Ecuador, this article explores differences between urban and rural dwellers and compares these with farmers' understandings of the causes, consequences and risks. We found urban and rural dwellers hold a similar understanding to that found in other nations, but articulated in ways that reflect their particular realities. Despite reporting firsthand experience of the agricultural effects of climate change, when prompted, farmers do not link climate change to their own experience. It is thus important to go beyond judging knowledge as correct or incorrect, and instead, incorporate local realities in the climate narrative.
