How Is the Norepinephrine System Involved in the Antiepileptic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation?

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive treatment for patients suffering from inoperable drug-resistant epilepsy. Although a complete understanding of the mediators involved in the antiepileptic effects of VNS and their complex interactions is lacking, VNS is known to trigger the release of neurotransmitters that have seizure-suppressing effects. In particular, norepinephrine (NE) is a neurotransmitter that has been associated with the clinical effects of VNS by preventing seizure development and by inducing long-term plastic changes that could restore a normal function of the brain circuitry. However, the biological requisites to become responder to VNS are still unknown. In this review, we report evidence of the critical involvement of NE in the antiepileptic effects of VNS in rodents and humans. Moreover, we emphasize the hypothesis that the functional integrity of the noradrenergic system could be a determining factor to obtain clinical benefits from the therapy. Finally, encouraging avenues of research involving NE in VNS treatment are discussed. These could lead to the personalization of the stimulation parameters to maximize the antiepileptic effects and potentially improve the response rate to the therapy.

Automated electrical source imaging with scalp EEG to define the insular irritative zone: Comparison with simultaneous intracranial EEG.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of automatedinterictallow-density electrical source imaging (LD-ESI) to define the insular irritative zone (IZ) by comparing the simultaneous interictal ESI localization with the SEEG interictal activity. METHODS: Long-term simultaneous scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and stereo-EEG (SEEG) with at least one depth electrode exploring the operculo-insular region(s) were analyzed. Automated interictal ESI was performed on the scalp EEG using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) and individual head models. A two-step analysis was performed: i) sublobar concordance betweencluster-based ESI localization and SEEG-based IZ; ii) time-locked ESI-/SEEG analysis. Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated using SEEG as reference standard. Subgroup analysis wascarried out, based onthe involvement of insular contacts in the seizure onset and patterns of insular interictal activity. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. ESI showed an overall accuracy of 53% (C.I. 29-76%). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 53% (C.I. 29-76%), 55% (C.I. 23-83%) respectively. Higher accuracy was found in patients with frequent and dominant interictal insular spikes. CONCLUSIONS: LD-ESI defines with good accuracy the insular implication in the IZ, which is not possible with classical interictalscalpEEG interpretation. SIGNIFICANCE: Automated LD-ESI may be a valuable additional tool to characterize the epileptogenic zone in epilepsies with suspected insular involvement.