Neurorehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury in the time of COVID-19: impact of the absence of caregivers.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several restrictions were imposed to limit the circulation of the infection within communities. Hospitals denied access to the family and friends of inpatients, and thus to caregivers. This observational study evaluated the impact of the physical absence of caregivers during the lockdown period due to the COVID-19 emergency on the rehabilitation of inpatients with severe acquired brain injury (sABI). METHODS: The functional outcome at discharge was measured in 25 inpatients with sABI through the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Levels of Cognitive Functioning scale (LCF) after neuropsychological rehabilitation in an Adult Inpatient Neurorehabilitation Unit for Patients with sABI. Fourteen patients were directly assisted by their informal caregivers physically present in the neurorehabilitation ward. Eleven patients were indirectly supported via remote connection because during the lockdown period (from March to July 2020) caregivers could not be admitted to the rehabilitation hospital. The Caregiving Impact on Neuro-Rehabilitation Scale (CINRS) was also used to evaluate both the change since the admission and the impact of the caregiver from the perspective of the cognitive therapist. Demographic characteristics, time since injury, injury severity (duration of impaired consciousness measured by the time to follow commands), level of functioning at the beginning of the rehabilitation, and duration of the rehabilitation treatment were comparable between the groups. RESULTS: Both groups improved after the treatment; however, the improvement was consistently greater in the group directly assisted by the caregivers. The results showed that although the caregivers ensured their virtual presence at distance, their physical absence played a role in hindering the functional outcome of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the caregiver of patients with sABI is underlined in being not only a person handing out generic aid, cares, and affection, but also an integral part of the rehabilitation process.

Two Ecological Tools for Testing Slowness of Information Processing in Italian Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Slowness of Information Processing (SIP) is frequently experienced after traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the impact of SIP on everyday functioning may be underestimated by standard neuropsychological tests. OBJECTIVE: we aimed to adapt two ecological instruments assessing SIP in Italian patients with moderate-to-severe TBI, as formerly proposed by Winkens and colleagues for persons with stroke, testing also its possible relation with other neuropsychological processes and functional outcomes. METHOD: we performed an observational study on 37 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI and 35 demographically matched healthy controls, who underwent the Mental Slowness Observation Test (MSOT) and the Mental Slowness Questionnaire (MSQ), which had been adapted through a pilot study on independent sample of participants; extensive neuropsychological and functional evaluations were performed as well. RESULTS: We found good clinical and psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the MSOT and MSQ; also, performance on MSOT significantly correlated with executive functions. Moreover, patients with TBI are significantly slower and less accurate than healthy controls on the MSOT, in particular in tasks with time limits. Even if the subjective feeling of SIP does not differ between patients and controls, we found a significant correlation between MSQ and MSOT. Finally, the performances on the MSOT correlated with measures of functional outcome and community integration. CONCLUSIONS: the results support the use of the MSOT and the MSQ to measure SIP in an ecological fashion in patients with TBI, so that specific treatments for persons with acquired brain injury can be prescribed.