The primary care osteoporosis risk of fracture screening (POROS) study: design and baseline characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: POROS evaluates a 3-step fracture risk screening program in women 50-64 not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis. This report details the research design and baseline characteristics. METHODS: Recruiting from 6 primary care sites, baseline characteristics, including fracture risk factors, were assessed via self-administered questionnaires (SAQs). Subjects with >or=1 risk factor were randomized to Intervention or Non-Intervention. Those without any risk factors were placed in the No Risk Factors group. Bone turnover was measured in the Intervention group via urine N-telopeptide (NTx) testing. Subjects with NTx>50 had central hip and spine Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (dxa). All groups were followed for 24 months, completing SAQs on osteoporosis management and fractures. At baseline, comparisons were made on demographics, health status, and prevalence of fracture risk factors. RESULTS: 2839 women were enrolled and included in baseline analyses (1464 Intervention, 372 Non-Intervention, and 1003 No Risk Factors). The mean age was 56.1 and 81.1% were postmenopausal. As expected by randomization, the Intervention and Non-Intervention groups had similar baseline characteristics. The most commonly reported fracture risk factors were body mass index <24 kg/m(2) and needing to use arms to stand from a chair. Subjects in the No Risk Factors group were more likely to be younger, heavier, Hispanic, in good health, a non-smoker, and to drink less alcohol. CONCLUSION: A stepwise screening program, utilizing data on fracture risk factors and high bone turnover prior to obtaining central bone density, can contribute significantly to fracture risk assessment in perimenopausal and younger postmenopausal women.

Effects of prasterone on disease activity and symptoms in women with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prasterone administration results in improvement or stabilization of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and its symptoms. METHODS: Women with active SLE were treated with prasterone 200 mg/day plus standard SLE treatments or with placebo plus standard SLE treatments for up to 12 months in this randomized, double-blind investigation conducted at 27 centers. Standard SLE treatments included prednisone (/=6 weeks prior to enrollment and remain unchanged during protocol treatment. Responders were patients who experienced no clinical deterioration and had improvement or stabilization over the duration of the study in 2 disease activity measures (the SLE Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI] and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) and 2 quality of life measures (patient's global assessment and the Krupp Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: A total of 381 women with SLE were enrolled. Among patients with clinically active disease at baseline (SLEDAI score >2), 86 of 147 in the prasterone group (58.5%) demonstrated improvement or stabilization without clinical deterioration, as compared with 65 of 146 in the placebo group (44.5%) (P = 0.017). Acne and hirsutism were reported in 33% and 16%, respectively, of the prasterone group and in 14% and 2%, respectively, of the placebo group (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, most cases of acne and hirsutism were mild and did not require withdrawal from therapy. Myalgias and oral stomatitis were reported less frequently in the prasterone group (22% and 15%, respectively) than in the placebo group (36% and 23%, respectively) (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). Serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and C3 complement significantly decreased, while levels of testosterone and, to a lesser extent, estradiol increased in the prasterone group. CONCLUSION: In adult women with active SLE, administration of prasterone at a dosage of 200 mg/day improved or stabilized signs and symptoms of disease and was generally well tolerated.