Resultados a medio plazo de la uretroplastia distal con colocación de sonda y sin ella. Análisis retrospectivo sobre la necesidad de reintervención y los resultados estéticos / Medium-term outcome after stented and un-stented distal urethroplasty: A retrospective analysis on redo-urethroplasty need and cosmetic results

Introducción: La tasa de complicaciones a largo plazo tras la reparación del hipospadias distal puede ascender al 20%, y aún no disponemos de directrices sobre la colocación de la sonda en la uretroplastia distal. Hemos analizado de forma retrospectiva la tasa de reintervención de la uretroplastia a medio plazo y los resultados estéticos tras un estudio piloto de 2años sobre las uretroplastias distales con colocación de sonda o sin ella.Materiales y métodosUn cirujano pediátrico realizó 11 procedimientos con la técnica de Snodgrass con colocación de sonda (grupo A) y 17 sin colocación de sonda (grupo B) en nuestra institución (2011-2013). La mediana de edad de los pacientes en la cirugía fue de 2,1 años (rango 1-8,5).Los criterios de inclusión fueron: defecto distal primitivo, un único cirujano en ambos procedimientos y alta sin sonda.La mediana de seguimiento fue de 6,4 años (rango 1,5-8,1).Los resultados clínicos y estéticos postoperatorios fueron evaluados al menos una vez mediante la herramienta HOSE (Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation).El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue comparar las complicaciones y las tasas de repetición de la uretroplastia a medio plazo antes de iniciar un estudio aleatorizado. Se hizo un análisis retrospectivo. Se utilizó la prueba exacta de Fisher (p <0,05) para el análisis estadístico.ResultadosDe los 28 del total, 5 complicaciones requirieron una segunda cirugía: 2/11 casos con sonda, 3/17 sin sonda. Los resultados estéticos fueron satisfactorios en ambos grupos. Los resultados no alcanzaron significación estadística (p=1.000). (AU)

Introduction: Long-term complication rates after distal hypospadias repair can be close to 20%. There are no available guidelines regarding the need of a catheter in distal urethroplasty. We report a retrospective analysis on medium-term redo-urethroplasty rate and cosmetic results after a two-year pilot study on stented/un-stented distal urethroplasties.Materials and methodsA total of 11 stented (Group A) and 17 un-stented (Group B) Snodgrass-procedures were performed by one pediatric surgeon at our Institution (2011-2013). The median age at surgery was 2.1 years (range 1-8.5).Inclusion criteria were primitive distal defect, same surgeon in both interventions, catheter-free discharge.The median follow-up was 6.4 years (range 1.5-8.1).All patients received at least one post-operative clinical-cosmetic examination (HOSE).The aim of our study was to compare medium-term complications and redo-urethroplasty rates before starting a randomized study. A retrospective analysis was performed. We used Fisher's exact-test (P<0.05) for statistical analysis.ResultsOf 28 complications, 5 required redo-surgery: 2/11 stented-cases, 3/17 un-stented. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in both groups. These results were not statistically significant (P=1.000). (AU)

Medium-term outcome after stented and un-stented distal urethroplasty: A retrospective analysis on redo-urethroplasty need and cosmetic results.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term complication rates after distal hypospadias repair can be close to 20%. There are no available guidelines regarding the need for a catheter in distal urethroplasty. We report a retrospective analysis on medium-term redo-urethroplasty rate and cosmetic results after a two-years pilot study on stented/un-stented distal urethroplasties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 stented (Group A) and 17 un-stented (Group B) Snodgrass-procedures were performed by the same pediatric surgeon at our Institution (2011-2013). The median age at surgery was 2.1 years (range 1-8.5). Inclusion criteria were primitive distal defect, same surgeon in both interventions, catheter-free discharge. The median follow-up was 6.4 years (range 1.5-8.1). All patients received at least one post-operative clinical-cosmetic examination (HOSE). The aim of our study was to compare medium-term complications and redo-urethroplasty rates before starting a randomized study. A retrospective analysis was performed. We used Fisher's exact-test (P < 0.05) for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 28 complications, 5 required redo-surgery: 2/11 stented-cases, 3/17 un-stented. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in both groups. These results were not statistically significant (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is mandatory to know redo-urethroplasty rate and cosmetic outcome after distal stented/un-stented repair. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of catheter placement and the definitive outcome in distal urethroplasty.

Medium-term outcome after stented and un-stented distal urethroplasty: A retrospective analysis on redo-urethroplasty need and cosmetic results. / Resultados a medio plazo de la uretroplastia distal con colocación de sonda y sin ella. Análisis retrospectivo sobre la necesidad de reintervención y los resultados estéticos.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term complication rates after distal hypospadias repair can be close to 20%. There are no available guidelines regarding the need of a catheter in distal urethroplasty. We report a retrospective analysis on medium-term redo-urethroplasty rate and cosmetic results after a two-year pilot study on stented/un-stented distal urethroplasties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 stented (Group A) and 17 un-stented (Group B) Snodgrass-procedures were performed by one pediatric surgeon at our Institution (2011-2013). The median age at surgery was 2.1 years (range 1-8.5). Inclusion criteria were primitive distal defect, same surgeon in both interventions, catheter-free discharge. The median follow-up was 6.4 years (range 1.5-8.1). All patients received at least one post-operative clinical-cosmetic examination (HOSE). The aim of our study was to compare medium-term complications and redo-urethroplasty rates before starting a randomized study. A retrospective analysis was performed. We used Fisher's exact-test (P<0.05) for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 28 complications, 5 required redo-surgery: 2/11 stented-cases, 3/17 un-stented. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in both groups. These results were not statistically significant (P=1.000). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up is mandatory to know redo-urethroplasty rate and cosmetic outcome after distal stented/un-stented repair. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of catheter placement and the definitive outcome in distal urethroplasty.

Laparoscopy or retroperitoneoscopy for pediatric patients with adrenal masses?

Minimally invasive approach to the adrenal gland was first reported in 1992. Since then, the experience with the laparoscopic technique for adrenal disease in children has been limited. We report our experience with minimally invasive adrenal surgery in children. Two young girls (2 and 4 years old) with a left adrenal mass were operated using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in our Unit. Ultrasonography and MRI showed in the oldest a 2 x 3 cm adrenal mass, while in the youngest a 5.5 x 5 cm adrenal tumor was found. According to the pre-existing literature, we approached the smallest lesion via retroperitoneoscopy, and the largest one laparoscopically. The operating time was 110 minutes for retroperitoneoscopy and 75 minutes for laparoscopy. No major intra or postoperative complications occurred. There were no conversions to open surgery. Postoperative hospital stay was 5 days for both patients. In both cases, the anatomo-pathological result was an adenoma. Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is a safe and feasible procedure in children with good results. For lesions smaller than 3-4 cm retroperitonescopy is feasible, while for tumors larger than 5 cm, due to malignancy risk, the laparoscopic approach is indicated. To keep oncologic criteria it is important to avoid tumor rupture and to extract the specimen in an endobag.

Is retroperitoneoscopic renal ablative surgery easier and safer using a new hemostatic device compared with clips and monopolar coagulation? A comparative study.

AIM: The aim of study was to retrospectively analyze our series of total and partial retroperiotoneoscopic nephrectomies performed in the last 5 years. METHODS: Twenty-two procedures were performed, 20 patients underwent nephrectomy and 2 patients underwent partial nephrectomy. The 20 patients who underwent nephrectomy were divided in 2 groups: group 1 (G1) patients-1-10, for whom we performed the procedure using monopolar coagulation, and group 2 (G2) patients 11-20 for whom we used a new hemostatic device to perform dissection and hemostasis. The results were analyzed using χ2 test. The results of partial nephrectomies were analyzed separately. RESULTS: No conversion were reported. We analyzed 6 parameters to compare the results: operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion (NT), complications, time to oral intake (TOI), hospital stay (HS). OT in G1 was in median 85 minutes, in G2 65 minutes (P=0.004); EBL was 15 mL for G1 and 5 mL for G2 (P=0.000.), NT was not necessary in both, in G1 we had 2 complications and 1 complication in G2; TOI was day 1 for both groups; median HS was 3 days for both. As for heminephrectomy, OT was 120 and 140 min, EBL 30 mL in both, NT not necessary, TOI was 1 day and HS 4 and 5 days respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the use of a new hemostatic devices reduce significantly OT and EBL in children underwent renal ablative surgery for benign pathologies compared with the use of monopolar coagulation.

Unilateral inguinal hernia: laparoscopic or inguinal approach. Decision making strategy: a prospective study.

The management of the contralateral region in a child with a known unilateral inguinal hernia is a debated issue among paediatric surgeons. The available literature indicates that the perspective of the child's parents is seldom. This study was performed to evaluate parents' views on this topic. After the Ethical Committee's approval, 100 consecutive patients under 12 years of age with a unilateral inguinal hernia were studied prospectively from March 2010 to September 2010. After an oral interview, a study form was given to the parents about the nature of an inguinal hernia, the incidence of 20 to 90% of a contralateral patency of the peritoneal-vaginal duct and the possible surgical options (inguinal repair or laparoscopic repair). The parents' decision and surgical results were analyzed. Eighty-nine parents chose laparoscopic approach, and 11 parents preferred inguinal exploration. Regarding their motives, all 89 parents requesting laparoscopic approach indicated that the convenience and risk to have a second anaesthesia was the primary reason of their decision. The 11 parents who preferred inguinal approach indicated that the fear of a new surgical technology was their primary reason. Conclusion There is no consensus about the management of paediatric patients with a unilateral inguinal hernia. We believe that a correct decision-making strategy for parents' choice is to propose them the both procedures. Our study shows that parents prefer laparoscopic inspection and repair in the vast majority of cases.

Meckel's diverticulum causing severe hemorrhage.

Meckel's diverticulum has varied presentations in children and often becomes a diagnostic challenge. The authors present a 10-year-old boy with abdominal pain and one episode of melena. His symptoms were undervalued during two previous hospitalizations in pediatric units until his hemoglobin level dropped from 8.2 to 3.5 g/dL. The laparoscopic intervention performed in emergency identified a bleeding Meckel's diverticulum that was resected after being exteriorized from the umbilicus. Our observation shows that severe hemorrhage due to a Meckel's diverticulum is possible albeit exceptional.