Obesity increases the risk of major wound complications following pelvic resection for bone sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Given the paucity of data, the objective of this study is to evaluate the association between obesity and major wound complications following pelvic bone sarcoma surgery specifically. METHODS: Patients who underwent pelvic resection for bone sarcoma from 2005 to 2021 with a minimum 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Patients with benign tumors, primary soft tissue sarcomas, local recurrence at presentation, pelvic metastatic disease, and underweight patients were excluded. A major wound complication was defined as the need for a secondary debridement procedure. Differences in baseline demographics, surgical factors, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were compared between obese and nonobese patients. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for major wound complications, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate overall survival between both groups. RESULTS: Of the 93 included patients, 21 were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). The obesity group had a significantly higher rate of major wound complication (52% vs. 26%, p = 0.034) and a lower Toronto Extremity Salvage Score at 1-year postoperatively (47.5 vs. 71.4, p = 0.025). Obesity was the only independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. No differences in overall survival were demonstrated between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a significant risk factor for major wound complications in pelvic bone sarcoma treatment. This highlights the importance of careful perioperative optimization and wound management.

Rank-Ordered List of Cost-effective Strategies for Preventing Prosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty in an Academic US Hospital.

Although the overall rate of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is low, it remains a major complication associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PJI represents a significant economic burden to the health care system that is projected to increase commensurate with increasing joint replacement volumes. This review provides a rank-ordered list of cost-effective strategies that are performable intraoperatively and have data supporting their efficacy at preventing PJI after TJA. This study may be helpful in assisting surgeons, ambulatory surgery center owners, and hospital acquisition committees to make reasonable and cost-conscious decisions in the face of changing reimbursement. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):327-332.].

Giant cell tumour of bone.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion that is difficult to treat as salvaging the joint can be associated with a high rate of local recurrence (LR). We evaluated the risk factors for tumour relapse after treatment of a GCTB of the limbs. A total of 354 consecutive patients with a GCTB underwent joint salvage by curettage and reconstruction with bone graft and/or cement or en bloc resection. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on LR. Patients treated with denosumab were excluded. There were 53 LRs (15%) at a mean 30.5 months (5 to 116). LR was higher after curettage (18.4%) than after resection (4.6%; p = 0.008). Neither pathological fracture (p = 0.240), Campanacci grade (p = 0.734), soft-tissue extension (p = 0.297), or tumour size (p = 0.872) affected the risk of recurrence. Joint salvage was possible in 74% of patients overall (262/354), and 98% after curettage alone (262/267). Of 49 patients with LR after curettage, 44 (90%) underwent repeated curettage and joint salvage. For patients treated by curettage, only age less than 30 years (p = 0.042) and location in the distal radius (p = 0.043) predicted higher LR. The rate of LR did not differ whether cement or bone graft was used (p = 0.753), but may have been reduced by the use of hydrogen peroxide (p = 0.069). Complications occurred in 15.3% of cases (54/354) and did not differ by treatment. Most patients with a GCTB can undergo successful joint salvage by aggressive curettage, even in the presence of a soft-tissue mass, pathological fracture, or a large lesion, with an 18.4% risk of local recurrence. However, 90% of local relapses after curettage can be treated by repeat joint salvage. Maximizing joint salvage is important to optimize long-term function since most patients with a GCTB are young adults. Younger patients and those with distal radius tumours treated with joint-sparing procedures have a higher rate of local relapse and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

Percutaneous Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation for Pain and Ambulatory Function in Periacetabular Osteolytic Malignancies.

Background Osteolytic neoplasms to periacetabular bone frequently cause pain and fractures. Immediate recovery is integral to lifesaving ambulatory oncologic care and maintaining quality of life. Yet, open acetabular reconstructive surgeries are associated with numerous complications that delay cancer treatments. Purpose To determine the effectiveness for short- and long-term pain and ambulatory function following percutaneous ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation (AORIF) for periacetabular osteolytic neoplasm. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated clinical data from 50 patients (mean age, 65 years ± 14 [SD]; 25 men, 25 women) with osteolytic periacetabular metastases or myeloma. The primary outcome of combined pain and ambulatory function index score (range, 1 [bedbound] through 10 [normal ambulation]) was assessed before and after AORIF at 2 weeks and then every 3 months up to 40 months (overall median follow-up, 11 months [IQR, 4-14 months]). Secondary outcomes included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, infection, transfusion, 30-day readmission, mortality, and conversion hip arthroplasty. Serial radiographs and CT images were obtained to assess the hip joint integrity. The paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze data. Results Mean combined pain and ambulatory function index scores improved from 4.5 ± 2.4 to 7.8 ± 2.1 (P < .001) and median ECOG scores from 3 (IQR, 2-4) to 1 (IQR, 1-2) (P < .001) at the first 2 weeks after AORIF. Of 22 nonambulatory patients, 19 became ambulatory on their first post-AORIF visit. Pain and functional improvement were retained beyond 1 year, up to 40 months after AORIF in surviving patients. No hardware failures, surgical site infections, readmissions, or delays in care were identified following AORIF. Of 12 patients with protrusio acetabuli, one patient required a conversion hemiarthroplasty at 24 months. Conclusion The ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation, or AORIF, technique was effective for short- and long-term improvement of pain and ambulatory function in patients with periacetabular osteolytic neoplasm. © RSNA, 2023.

Emerging Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Procedures for Periacetabular Osteolytic Metastases.

➤: Periacetabular osteolytic skeletal metastases are frequently associated with pain and impaired ambulatory function. Minimally invasive techniques allow for the restoration of ambulation without interrupting critical systemic cancer therapy. ➤: The open surgical management of massive periacetabular osteolytic lesions, such as by curettage, internal fixation, or complex total hip reconstruction, is associated with blood loss, hospitalization, rehabilitation, and complications such as infection or delayed wound-healing. ➤: Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures have become increasingly popular for the management of periacetabular osteolytic metastases by interventional oncologists and orthopaedic surgeons before complex open surgical procedures are considered. ➤: Minimally invasive procedures may include various methods of cancer ablation and reinforcement techniques. Minimally invasive procedures may entail cancer ablation, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement reinforcement, balloon osteoplasty, percutaneous screw fixation, or combinations of the aforementioned techniques (e.g., ablation-osteoplasty-reinforcement-internal fixation [AORIF]).

Intermuscular extremity myxoid liposarcoma can be managed by marginal resection following neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Compared with other soft tissue sarcomas, myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) occurs in younger patients, has a propensity for intermuscular locations and is highly radiosensitive. With pre-operative radiotherapy, intermuscular MLS demonstrates substantial volume reduction and can be easily separated from surrounding tissues during resection. However, it is unclear whether marginal excision of MLS is oncologically safe. This study aimed to assess the association between margins and survival in irradiated, intermuscular MLS. METHODS: The study identified 198 patients from seven sarcoma centres with a first presentation of localized, extremity, intermuscular MLS that received pre-operative radiotherapy and was diagnosed between 1990 and 2017. Patient and treatment characteristics, radiological and histological responses to neoadjuvant treatment and clinical surveillance were recorded. RESULTS: Margins were microscopically positive in 11% (n = 22), <1.0 mm in 15% (n = 29) and ≥1.0 mm in 72% (n = 143). There was no association between margin status and local recurrence-free, metastasis-free or overall survival. This finding held true even in patients at higher risk of worse overall survival based on multivariable analysis (% round cell≥5%, percentage ellipsoid tumour volume change ≤ -60.1%). CONCLUSION: Irradiated, extremity, intermuscular myxoid liposarcoma can safely undergo marginal resection without compromising oncologic control.

Inflammatory conversion of quiescent osteoblasts by metastatic breast cancer cells through pERK1/2 aggravates cancer-induced bone destruction.

Disruption of bone homeostasis caused by metastatic osteolytic breast cancer cells increases inflammatory osteolysis and decreases bone formation, thereby predisposing patients to pathological fracture and cancer growth. Alteration of osteoblast function induces skeletal diseases due to the disruption of bone homeostasis. We observed increased activation of pERK1/2 in osteolytic breast cancer cells and osteoblasts in human pathological specimens with aggressive osteolytic breast cancer metastases. We confirmed that osteolytic breast cancers with high expression of pERK1/2 disrupt bone homeostasis via osteoblastic ERK1/2 activation at the bone-breast cancer interface. The process of inflammatory osteolysis modulates ERK1/2 activation in osteoblasts and breast cancer cells through dominant-negative MEK1 expression and constitutively active MEK1 expression to promote cancer growth within bone. Trametinib, an FDA-approved MEK inhibitor, not only reduced breast cancer-induced bone destruction but also dramatically reduced cancer growth in bone by inhibiting the inflammatory skeletal microenvironment. Taken together, these findings suggest that ERK1/2 activation in both breast cancer cells and osteoblasts is required for osteolytic breast cancer-induced inflammatory osteolysis and that ERK1/2 pathway inhibitors may represent a promising adjuvant therapy for patients with aggressive osteolytic breast cancers by altering the shared cancer and bone microenvironment.

Bone Scans Have Little Utility in the Evaluation of Well-Differentiated Cartilaginous Lesions of the Humerus.

In the humerus, pain is a poor guide for differentiating between benign enchondromas and malignant well-differentiated chondrosarcomas. Radionuclide bone scans often are used, and chondrosarcomas reliably show increased uptake. However, it remains to be seen whether enchondromas consistently have negative findings on bone scans, which would provide reliable differentiation from malignant lesions. Imaging and medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent radionuclide bone scans for enchondroma of the humerus at one academic medical center over a period of 7 years. Bivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of bone scan results with the finding of endosteal scalloping on radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. During initial evaluation, 25 patients who had enchondroma of the humerus underwent radionuclide bone scans. No patients showed progression of lesions during an average follow-up of 69 weeks. On bone scan, 18 (72%) had significantly positive findings, 5 (20%) had mildly positive findings, and 2 (8%) had negative findings. Of the 22 patients who underwent MRI scans, 4 showed endosteal scalloping and none showed aggressive features. No statistically significant association was seen between significantly positive (P=.299) or mildly positive findings on bone scans (P=.810) and the finding of endosteal scalloping on radiographs or MRI scans. Enchondromas rarely showed negative findings on bone scans, and bone scan findings did not correlate with the findings on radiographs or MRI scans. The diagnosis of enchondroma can be made based on clinical and radiographic findings, and the added utility of bone scans does not justify their regular use. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e498-e502.].

Endovascular Balloon Occlusion: An Adjunct to Hemostasis for Above-Knee Amputation After Recalcitrant Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection of Knee in a Morbidly Obese Patient: A Case Report.

CASE: A 72-year-old morbidly obese nonambulatory woman with bilateral chronically infected revision knee prostheses and incompetent extensor mechanisms who uses a wheelchair had limited functionality and presented with recalcitrant chronic infection with multiple hospitalizations. The patient underwent staged bilateral above-knee amputations. The first procedure caused extensive morbidity secondary to poor vascular control. For the second surgery, collaboration with vascular surgery was used to achieve endovascular control of the external iliac artery with improved postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular balloon occlusion may be an effective adjunct to customary hemostasis modalities during above-knee amputations in morbidly obese patients.

Synovial Myxoma: Found in Canines, Rabbits, and Now Humans Too?: A Case Report.

CASE: A 63 year-old woman presented with a multiple-year history of right knee pain and effusions and pain refractory to numerous knee aspirations and an arthroscopic synovectomy. The patient underwent a 2-incision synovectomy and intralesional resection. A pathologic review of the specimens revealed an infiltrative tumor of basophilic, cluster of differentiation 68-positive synovial cells embedded within a myxoid stroma with low proliferative activity, most consistent with a synovial myxoma. CONCLUSIONS: This case report of a synovial myxoma-a benign, slow growing but locally aggressive mass that is most commonly found in canines-indicates that the lesion may occasionally occur in humans.

Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation (AORIF) for Osteolytic Lesions in the Pelvis and Periarticular Regions of Weight-Bearing Bones.

PURPOSE: To assess early outcome, safety, and complications of an alternative to open surgical treatments of osteolytic lesions in periarticular load-bearing bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective clinical cohort study of 26 lesions in 23 consecutive patients with painful osteolytic skeletal lesions was performed. Patients were followed for an average of 7 mo (1-18 mo). Lesions were targeted from the most intact bone via minimally invasive percutaneous approach for stable anchorage of internal fixation screws using fluoroscopic guidance. Cannulated screws served as universal portals for ablation, balloon osteoplasty, and delivery of bone cement in addition to internal fixation for cement anchoring and prophylactic stabilization of uninvolved bone. RESULTS: There were 19 osteolytic lesions in the pelvis, 4 in the proximal femur, 2 in the proximal tibia, and 1 in the calcaneus. All defects were associated with severe pain or fractures. There were no conversions to open surgery and no infection or bleeding requiring transfusion, embolization, or additional procedures. There was significant improvement in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score from 8.32 ± 1.70 to 2.36 ± 2.23, combined pain and functional ambulation score from 4.48 ± 2.84 to 7.28 ± 2.76, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score from 45% to 68% (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation is a safe and effective minimally invasive percutaneous image-guided treatment option for functional improvement or palliation of painful osteolytic lesions in the pelvis and periarticular loadbearing bones.

Musculoskeletal Effects of Antineoplastic Agents.

Cancer remains a common disease with approximately 40% of Americans diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. Medical advances in the field of oncology have led to an increased life expectancy and a decreased mortality rate. Antineoplastic agents such as taxanes and targeted therapies are indicated in the treatment of many cancers, and their use can be associated with various musculoskeletal complaints and adverse effects. Orthopaedic Surgeons are trained to identify primary bone tumors and metastasis to bones. It is also important for them to have an understanding of the profile of musculoskeletal adverse effects associated with the treatment of the more common neoplasms. This article reviews the current literature on the commonly used chemotherapeutic agents and their associated musculoskeletal effects.

Excisional Curettage of Benign Cystic Lesions.

There are many treatment modalities for benign cystic lesions of bone, but all methods, except for total resection, are plagued with varying rates of recurrence1. Thorough curettage with the use of a high-speed burr, however, has demonstrated a low recurrence rate of 12% and has been suggested to be the best method for the treatment of benign cystic lesions. Approximately 90% of aneurysmal bone cysts can be controlled adequately with this treatment alone2. DESCRIPTION: Treatment of benign cystic lesions of bone with the use of excisional curettage requires careful preoperative planning and patient positioning before the initial incision is made. The initial incision must be carefully planned to expose the entire lesion without violating multiple compartments unnecessarily. A sizeable cortical window must then be made using a high-speed burr followed by evacuation of all cystic contents via curettage. The cavity is copiously irrigated before an adjuvant is used, and the lesion is stabilized, if necessary, before closing. ALTERNATIVES: There are many types of alternatives to curettage, such as wide resection, radiation, and embolization of feeding vessels. RATIONALE: In orthopaedics, as in all medical specialties, many interventions and techniques have been rendered obsolete and, ultimately, replaced by newer, safer, and more efficient ones. The appeal of curettage has remained because of its procedural simplicity and adaptability in the management of a plethora of diseases such as benign cystic lesions of bone. Additionally, curettage, unlike wide resection, radiation, and embolization of feeding vessels, is minimally invasive and often definitive in nature when used as a treatment modality2. Lastly, curettage grants the performing surgeon the ability to maintain a contained cavity that can be treated with a variety of adjuvant therapies3-17. These reasons listed above make curettage a viable option for the surgical treatment of benign cystic lesions such as giant cell tumors of bone, aneurysmal bone cysts, unicameral bone cysts, chondromyxoid fibromas, and symptomatic nonossifying fibromas.

Pharmacologic and Radiation Therapies for Cancer-Induced Bone Loss.

Advancements in medical and radiation oncology have improved the prognosis for many cancers during the past few decades. As a result, physicians are challenged with managing a greater burden of disease for a longer time. In orthopaedics, bone loss secondary to metastatic tumor places patients at risk of impending and pathologic fractures. These events limit functional independence, lessen the quality of life, and place a financial burden on patients and their families. Thus, it is important for clinicians to be aware of measures capable of mitigating cancer-induced bone loss.

Metastatic Cancers to Bone: An Overview and Cancer-Induced Bone Loss.

Metastatic bone disease is a substantial driver of morbidity and mortality in many cancers. The presence of bone metastases often indicates a worse prognosis for patients. The mechanisms underlying bone metastases and bone loss are complex and involve interaction between the local factors controlling bone remodeling, systemic regulators, cancer cells, the immune system, and pharmaceutical agents. Cancer cells hone to and initiate interactions with bone cells, thereby resulting in an increase or decrease of local bone mass. Osteolytic metastases are clinically important because they place patients at risk of skeletally related events. In the era of precision medicine and targeted therapies, several pathways have been identified that can serve as targets for new drugs. Therefore, it becomes necessary to understand the molecular mechanisms governing normal bone homeostasis and cancer-induced bone loss to optimally use available and emerging therapeutic modalities for the benefit of patients with skeletal metastases. When pharmacologic or radiation therapies do not block the pathogenesis of metastatic cancer-induced bone loss, surgical stabilization and reinforcement procedures are performed based on size of the lesion, location, degree of osteolysis, and pain. These interventions are performed with the goal of improving patient function and overall outcome.

Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction for Skeletal Metastases and Pathologic Fractures.

Skeletal metastases of the femur and tibia leading to pathologic fractures or large skeletal defects can be managed with surgical reconstruction, resulting in improved patient outcomes and functionality. The indications for femoral and tibial reconstruction are dependent on several factors, including goals of management, age, comorbidities, site and extent of the lesion, soft-tissue involvement, and history of radiation or other systemic therapy. The goal of reconstruction of large bone defects is to restore anatomy and function while minimizing the risk of complications, implant failure, and subsequent revision procedure. Common reconstructive options include fixation with plates and screws, intramedullary nails, and endoprosthesis implantation.

A Practical Analgesia Approach to Fragility Hip Fracture: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Cohort Study on Femoral Nerve Block.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an effective opioid-sparing pain control modality is desirable for an aging population. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study SETTING:: Academic medical center PATIENTS:: 192 patients with various types of fragility hip fractures INTERVENTION:: A single-injection femoral nerve block (FNB) MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Pain score, opioid consumption RESULTS:: We observed statistically significant effects of FNB on visual analogue scale pain score and the rate of opioid consumption diminution in all commonly encountered types of fragility hip fractures. The pain score reduction by FNB in subcapital femoral neck fracture, transcervical femoral neck facture, and intertrochanteric fracture are all statistically significant (P < 0.0001). There was a statistically more significant pain score reduction in intracapsular fractures than in extracapsular fractures (P = 0.006). On average, the hip fracture patients required 0.9 and 0.1 mg morphine equivalent/hour before and after FNB block placement. This decrease in opioid consumption when calculated per unit time was statistically significant in subcapital femoral neck fracture, transcervical femoral neck facture, and intertrochanteric fracture (P < 0.0001). There were no complications related to FNB placement. CONCLUSIONS: FNB is a sustainable, safe, and useful analgesic modality for commonly encountered fragility hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Discriminative Ability for Adverse Outcomes After Surgical Management of Hip Fractures: A Comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure, and Modified Frailty Index.

OBJECTIVES: The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Elixhauser comorbidity measure (ECM), and modified frailty index (mFI) have been associated with mortality after hip fracture. The present study compares the clinically informative discriminative ability of CCI, ECM, and mFI, as well as demographic characteristics for predicting in-hospital adverse outcomes after surgical management of hip fractures. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were selected from the 2013 National Inpatient Sample. The discriminative ability of CCI, ECM, and mFI, as well as demographic factors for adverse outcomes were assessed using the area under the curve analysis from receiver operating characteristic curves. Outcomes included the occurrence of any adverse event, death, severe adverse events, minor adverse events, and extended hospital stay. RESULTS: In total, 49,738 patients were included (mean age: 82 years). In comparison with CCI and mFI, ECM had the significantly largest discriminative ability for the occurrence of all outcomes. Among demographic factors, age had the sole or shared the significantly largest discriminative ability for all adverse outcomes except extended hospital stay. The best performing comorbidity index (ECM) outperformed the best performing demographic factor (age) for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Among both comorbidity indices and demographic factors, the ECM had the best overall discriminative ability for adverse outcomes after surgical management of hip fractures. The use of this index in correctly identifying patients at risk for postoperative complications may help set appropriate patient expectations, assist in optimizing prophylaxis regimens for medical management, and adjust reimbursements. More widespread use of this measure for hip fracture studies may be appropriately considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.