RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity worldwide. Ocular and periocular metastasis present as a rare but clinically significant manifestation. This study aims to explore demographics and clinical aspects of ocular and periocular metastasis in breast cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprising 45 breast cancer patients with ocular or periocular metastasis treated between 2013 and 2023. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, diagnostic methods, treatment modalities, visual outcomes, and survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 9902 breast cancer patients, 0.5% developed ocular or periocular metastasis, constituting 2.4% of metastatic cases. The median age was 50 years. Ocular metastasis timing varied: 5% before breast cancer, 24% concurrent, 22% within a year, and 49% after. The most common presentations included incidental MRI findings (42%) and vision decline (31%). Metastasis involved the orbit (47%), choroid (40%), optic nerve (11%), and iris (2%), with 44% having bilateral involvement. Predictive factors included invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) (p < 0.0001) and brain metastasis (p < 0.0001), with ILC exhibiting a sixfold higher likelihood of ocular metastasis than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Primary treatment was radiation therapy (89%), yielding a 55% maintenance of excellent vision (<0.5), with 93% developing dry eye disease. Patients with ocular metastasis faced an increased risk of disease-related mortality (p < 0.0001), with 71% succumbing within 10 months post-diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular metastasis in breast cancer is rare (0.5%) but signifies poor outcome. It is linked to ILC and concurrent brain metastasis. Primary treatment involves radiation therapy, with a favorable visual prognosis.
RESUMO
Introduction: Advances in molecular diagnostics led to improved targeted interventions in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors. However, the capacity to test for these is limited in LMICs, and thus their value needs exploration. Methods: We reviewed our experience with NGS testing (TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer-seq panel) for pediatric CNS tumors at KHCC/Jordan (March/2022-April/2023). Paraffin blocks' scrolls were shipped to the SickKids laboratory based on the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) recommendations. We reviewed the patients' characteristics, the tumor types, and the NGS results' impact on treatment. Results: Of 237 patients discussed during the MDC meetings, 32 patients (14%) were included. They were 16 boys and 16 girls; the median age at time of testing was 9.5 years (range, 0.9-21.9 years). There were 21 samples sent at diagnosis and 11 upon tumor progression. The main diagnoses were low-grade-glioma (15), high-grade-glioma (10), and other histologies (7). Reasons to request NGS included searching for a targetable alteration (20) and to better characterize the tumor behavior (12). The median turnaround time from samples' shipment to receiving the results was 23.5 days (range, 15-49 days) with a median laboratory processing time of 16 days (range, 8-39 days) at a cost of US$1,000/sample. There were 19 (59%) tumors that had targetable alterations (FGFR/MAPK pathway inhibitors (14), checkpoint inhibitors (2), NTRK inhibitors (2), and one with PI3K inhibitor or IDH1 inhibitor). Two rare BRAF mutations were identified (BRAFp.G469A, BRAFp.K601E). One tumor diagnosed initially as undifferentiated round cell sarcoma harbored NAB2::STAT6 fusion and was reclassified as an aggressive metastatic solitary fibrous tumor. Another tumor initially diagnosed as grade 2 astroblastoma grade 2 was reclassified as low-grade-glioma in the absence of MN1 alteration. NGS failed to help characterize a tumor that was diagnosed histologically as small round blue cell tumor. Nine patients received targeted therapy; dabrafenib/trametinib (6), pembrolizumab (2), and entrectinib (1), mostly upon tumor progression (7). Conclusion: In this highly selective cohort, a high percentage of targetable mutations was identified facilitating targeted therapies. Outsourcing of NGS testing was feasible; however, criteria for case selection are needed. In addition, local capacity-building in conducting the test, interpretation of the results, and access to "new drugs" continue to be a challenge in LMICs.
RESUMO
Background: The number of cancer survivors and survivorship are increasing. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not been widely studied in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study is to explore HRQOL of childhood brain tumor survivors and its determinants in Jordan. Methods: Health-related quality of life information was collected from 80 patients treated at the King Hussein Cancer Center and their parents using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales questionnaire in Arabic. Multivariable linear OLS regression models were used to analyze correlates of HRQOL and compare differences between child- and parent-reported responses. Results: Health-related quality of life scores reported by survivors and by parents were positively correlated on all subscales and total PedsQL scores (r = 0.59, P = .001). Survivors reported better HRQOL in cognitive subscale (ß = 0.56, P = .03) and worse HRQOL in work subscale (ß = 0.43, P = .04), but no significant differences in the physical, emotional, and social subscales and total PedsQL scores. Significant predictors of HRQOL reported by parents and by children were different. Supratentorial tumor location was associated with a 10.97-unit lower physical HRQOL score, and recurrence of tumors predicted a 17.5-unit lower total HRQOL score, indicating worse quality of life. Male gender (ß = 14.9, P = .002) and diagnosis of hypopituitarism (ß = 16.1, P = .03) were associated with better HRQOL. Furthermore, patients that only had radiotherapy treatment had better emotional HRQOL (ß = 32.9, P = .006) compared to patients that had combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Conclusion: This study provides evidence on determinants of HRQOL of pediatric brain tumor patients in Jordan. Future studies need to capitalize on the findings of this study to institute a system for regular assessment of quality of life of pediatric cancer patients in Jordan and other countries with similar health care systems and sociocultural backgrounds.
RESUMO
Brain metastasis (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and associated with poor prognosis. The mainstay of treatment for BM from CRC is radiotherapy, systemic treatment options for CRC can include novel targeted agents, conventional chemotherapy or a combination of both. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these systemic treatment options against BM from CRC is not yet fully established. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic CRC. The combination of cetuximab with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is commonly utilized as a systemic treatment for metastatic CRC. Hereby, we report a case of BM from CRC with significant response after capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) combined with cetuximab.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) with spread to the brain (brain metastasis) is uncommon and often has a bad outcome. The main modality of treatment is usually radiotherapy. Other treatment options for CRC that has spread to the body can include new agents, classical chemotherapy drugs or both. But we do not know for sure if these agents are effective in treating spread to the brain from CRC. Cetuximab, is one of the relatively new drugs that is being used to treat certain genetic types of CRC with spread to the body, particularly when given together with other chemotherapy drugs known as XELOX. Here, we report a case of a brain mass that has spread from CRC. This brain mass showed a significant response to the regimen of cetuximab with XELOX. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient whose brain metastasis from CRC has responded well to this drug treatment alone before any radiation therapy.
