The strategy for predicting future exacerbation of asthma using a combination of the Asthma Control Test and lung function test.

BACKGROUND: Various factors have been reported to be useful for predicting future exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: This study was intended to determine a usefulness of a combination of a patient-based questionnaire, such as the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score with objective assessments, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and/or exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)), for predicting future exacerbations in adult asthmatics. METHODS: We therefore enrolled 78 subjects with mild to moderate asthma, who were clinically stable for 3 months who all had been regularly receiving inhaled steroid treatment. All subjects underwent a routine assessment of asthma control including the ACT score, spirometry, and FE(NO), and then were followed up until a severe exacerbation occurred. The predictors of an increased risk of severe exacerbation were identified and validated using decision trees based on a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. The properties of the developed models were the evaluated with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: The CART analysis automatically selected the variables and cut-off points, the ACT score

Comparison of the Asthma Health Questionnaire-33-Japan and the short-form 36-item health survey for measuring quality of life in Japanese patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: The Asthma Health Questionnaire (AHQ)-Japan is useful for assessing quality of life (QOL) in Japanese patients with asthma. However, no studies have compared the AHQ-Japan to other QOL instruments. METHODS: The AHQ-33-Japan and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) were completed simultaneously by 126 Japanese patients with asthma (48 men, 78 women; 58.1 +/- 17.3 years of age), and the data were compared. RESULTS: Poor negative correlations (correlation coefficient (r) = -0.20 to -0.44, P < 0.05) were observed for 38 combinations of the subscales of these QOL instruments. As the severity of the patients' asthma increased, the scores of most subscales of both QOL instruments became worse. However, the AHQ-33 was more sensitive for severity than the SF-36. On logistic regression analysis, high Asthmatic Symptoms, Factors which Worsened Symptoms, Emotion, Daily Activity, and Social Activity subscale scores, as well as a high total 32-item score, of the AHQ-33 were associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe asthma. On the other hand, only the Physical functioning subscale score of the SF-36 was associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the AHQ-33 is useful as a disease-specific QOL instrument in Japanese patients with asthma and that it is better than the SF-36, which is a generic QOL instrument. In the future, the AHQ-33 should be compared to other asthma-specific questionnaires.

[Use of transport medium in sputum bacterial culture examination of lower airway infection].

Our medical institution does not have a bacterial culture facility, requiring outsourcing of bacterial culture tests. Due to the time elapsed from the time of specimen collection to culturing, the identification of causative bacteria in respiratory tract infections tends to be difficult. We therefore used transport medium for sputum bacteria examinations. Expectorated purulent or purulent-mucous sputum specimens were collected from 32 patients with lower respiratory tract infection. We divided each of the sputum specimens into the two treatment groups: transport medium (Seedswab gamma2) ndar and stad disinfection container. Paired samples prepared from each patient were sent out for bacterial culture together. The time elapsed from collection to delivery to the lab were as follows: day 0 (same day, n = 14 patients), day 1 (n = 15), day 2 (n = 2), and day 3 (n = 1). The identified causative bacteria were Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 6 patients), Haemophilus influenzae (n =5), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 2), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1), and Streptococcus agalactiae (n = 1). Samples prepared by each of the two methods gave similar results. The utility of transport medium for examination of general bacteria for lower airway infection from sputum samples was not demonstrated. The rate of detection of bacteria decreased, when the transport of samples was delayed. Therefore, we need to send the sputum specimens as quickly as possible.