Assessing the Preliminary Efficacy of a Nonrandomized, Clinic-Based HIV Risk Reduction Pilot Intervention for PrEP-Initiated, Alcohol- and Other Drug-Using Women of Color in Miami, FL.

In this paper, we assessed the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of a quasi-experimental, clinic-based sexual risk reduction pilot intervention for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-initiated, alcohol- and other drug-using women of color and explored their self-reported barriers to, and facilitators of, PrEP use. Using a mixed methods design, analyses incorporated pre- and post-intervention study assessment data from 38 women and semi-structured process evaluations using a subsample of 25. The intervention administered over an 8-week period consisted of 4 one-on-one in person educational sessions, a process evaluation, and study assessments conducted at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Post intervention, statistically significant changes in sexual risk scores were not observed; however, we found significant decreases in alcohol use (Z = - 3.02, p = .003, η2 = .41). Process evaluation data revealed interpersonal relationships as a key motivator for PrEP initiation as well as a prominent barrier to PrEP use; these relationships rarely facilitated adherence. Overall, women found the intervention to be acceptable and reported a wide range of benefits of participation-most notably its therapeutic benefits. Findings from this study provide preliminary evidence of the potential for the Talking PrEP with Women of Color intervention to improve risky behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes related to sexual risk taking. Furthermore, findings suggest that interventions to increase PrEP uptake and adherence in at-risk women may benefit from supporting them in accurately estimating their risk for HIV and increasing their sense of social support.

Understanding the Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Type and Timing on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Knowledge, Acceptability, Sexual Behavior, and Gender Roles Among Women of Color.

Knowledge and acceptability are key factors for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) and research suggests that different types of IPV affect PrEP uptake differently. Few studies have examined whether the type (i.e., physical, sexual, and psychological) and timing (i.e., lifetime, past year) of IPV experiences are related to PrEP knowledge and acceptability, or whether gender roles and sexual risk behaviors affect PrEP use. We aimed to examine the associations between lifetime and past-year physical, sexual, and psychological IPV experiences on PrEP-related outcomes (i.e., knowledge, acceptability, sexual behavior if on PrEP) and the association between gender roles and PrEP-related outcomes. A total of 186 women of color at risk for HIV participated in this study, of whom 54% had ever experienced partner violence. Results showed that lifetime psychological (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-9.4) and lifetime physical IPV (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.2-18.9) were significantly associated with increased PrEP knowledge. lifetime psychological (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.0-13.6) and lifetime physical IPV (OR 4.3, 95% CI 4.3-11.5) were significantly associated with increased sexual behavior if on PrEP. Past year physical IPV was significantly associated with interest in using PrEP (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.7-4.3) and with sexual behavior if on PrEP (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.1-13.1). Being subordinate to others was also significantly associated with interest in using PrEP (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.4) Self-silencing was significantly associated with increased sexual behavior if on PrEP (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5). Gender norms and IPV type and timing can influence whether a person is interested in PrEP use. Both lifetime and past-year IPV experiences need to be examined in the context of gender norms when prescribing PrEP to encourage uptake and continuation among vulnerable women at risk for HIV.