Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery.

AIMS: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly of the urethra and phallus, which is not life threatening. It is thus less prioritised in a resource-limited setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of hypospadias by our paediatric surgery unit and determine the factors affecting the delay between presentation and surgical repair while proffering possible solutions to such delay in hypospadias repair surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all hypospadias repair surgeries carried out by our paediatric surgery unit over a 38-month period, evaluating the period between presentation and first surgery for each patient. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2011, Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 38 months, 47 operations for hypospadias were carried out on 42 boys. Thirty-seven patients (88.1%) had >3 months delay to surgery. The most frequent contributory factor to delay was unavailable theatre space (13 patients, 31%). Surgical outcome was good in only 16 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients with good outcome, 10 (63%) were operated between the ages of 2-4 years (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors are responsible for delays in carrying out hypospadias surgery in resource-limited environments, notably securing a functional operating theatre suite in the light of more urgent conditions. To combat these delays, we recommend having dedicated hypospadias repair sessions and surgeons dedicated to hypospadias repair. Hypospadias outreach camps are also proposed.

Early outcome of open primary pull through versus staged pull through in Hirschsprung's disease: a single centre experience from Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of Hirschsprung's disease has followed a trend from 2 or 3-staged pull-through (SPT) procedures to a single stage primary pull-through (PPT) procedure and from open surgery to laparoscopy-assisted, and trans-anal pull through procedures. The (PPT) procedure has the advantage of avoiding a stoma and its complications. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the outcomes in open PPT and SPT in our centre. METHODS: Retrospective observational study at a single centre from Nigeria over a 4year period. RESULTS: Of 46 patients with Hirschsprung's disease, 29 patients had pull-through procedures during the study period; 19 had SPT and 10 had PPT. There were 21 boys and 8 girls (M:F = 2.6:1). Five (17.1%) were diagnosed in the neonatal period and median age at surgery was 30 months (1 month - 31 yrs). The mean length of hospital stay was 30 days (+/- 7) in the SPT group while it was 16 days (+/- 3) in the PPT group, p < 0.05. Colostomy morbidity such as prolapse and skin excoriation showed statistical significant difference compared to other complications associated with pull-through (p < 0.05); however morbidity from pull-through procedures alone were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in post operative bowel habit irrespective of type of pull through operation performed (p > 0.05). Patients were followed up for between 3 months and 36 months. Two patients died giving a mortality rate of 6.7% overall. CONCLUSION: PPT significantly reduced both hospital stay and colostomy complications compared to SPT.