Multinational study on profile preference of laypersons.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the facial profile preferences of lay people in seven locations from different countries and whether their place of residence, sex, age, race, education, or income influenced the decision. METHODS: After altering the lip and nose in 1 mm increments in the sagittal and sagittal/vertical directions, 50 profile silhouettes with white-like facial features were rated by evaluators. The soft tissue values were integrated into the profiles, and profile preferences were identified for each location. An ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test was used to compare the differences in mean preference in each location. A multivariable regression model was used to assess the effect of the demographics of the evaluator on preference. RESULTS: Thirteen profiles were ultimately analyzed. The mean for profile preference was significantly different across locations (P < 0.0001). For evaluators in the United States and Lebanon, the most preferred profile had the original lip and original nose. In Switzerland and South Africa, retrusive lips, and a small and less upturned nose was most preferred. In Japan and Saudi Arabia, the most preferred profile had the original lip and a protrusive nose that was less upturned. A protrusive lip with a small, upturned nose was preferred in Turkey. Profile change (P < 0.0001), location (P < 0.0001), sex (P < 0.0001), and race (P = 0.02) were significant confounders; in contrast, age, education, and income were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Profile preference is different among the seven locations. For the most part, lay people prefer profiles within one SD from white norms. Also, an upturned nose is the least favored in most of the locations. Sex and race are also significant confounders. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An orthodontic treatment plan decision is affected by an individual's preference for their facial appearance. This study helps clinicians understand how racial and regional differences may affect patients' preferences and, therefore, their expectations for orthodontic treatment results.

Awareness of the Effect of Diabetes on Oral Health among a Population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

PURPOSE: Diabetes is an ever-growing health issue in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It has several oral health implications and oral health in turn affects diabetes control. The primary objective of this research was to study the awareness of the effect of diabetes on oral health among the general population in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A closed-ended, validated questionnaire was distributed to 506 randomly selected shopping-mall-goers. Responses were coded and entered into spreadsheet (SPSS, IBM) and frequency distribution of the responses was calculated. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents were females (62.5%), non-diabetic (80.2%) and reported a positive family history of diabetes (87.9%). Most of them (63.4%) understood the importance of discussing one's diabetes status with the dentist as it affected the treatment plan, and also knew (84.4%) that diabetes affects oral health in some way. A majority also correctly responded to how diabetes affects oral health (66.3%) and to the sequelae of untreated gum disease (87.2%). The majority of the respondents had not received any tips or information regarding the connection between diabetes and oral health. CONCLUSION: This study reported adequate knowledge of the sample with respect to diabetes-related oral health. An important finding of this study was that the majority of the study participants did not receive information leading to diabetes-related oral health awareness or knowledge from anyone, which implies that health professionals and health media do not play the requisite role in dissemination of this important aspect of public health.