Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 44(7): 1252-1258, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29607580

RESUMO

AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal perineal massage (APM) in reducing perineal trauma and post-partum morbidities. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 108 primigravidae at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, was conducted from January 2013 to May 2014. The intervention group received APM, while the control group did not receive APM. RESULTS: Women who received APM were significantly more likely to have an intact perineum after childbirth [27/53 (50.9%) vs 16/55 (29.1%); RR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.07-2.86; P = 0.02]. The incidence of episiotomy was lower in the intervention group [20/53 (37.7%) vs 32/55 (58.2%); RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.98; P = 0.03; NNT = 5]. Women who received APM were significantly less likely to develop flatus incontinence [4/53 (8.3%) vs 13/55 (26.0%); RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11-0.91; P = 0.03]. However, the incidences of premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor and birth asphyxia were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: APM reduces the incidence of episiotomy and increases the incidence of women with an intact perineum after vaginal delivery. It also reduces the risk of flatus incontinence after childbirth without increased maternal or neonatal complications. Women should therefore be counseled on the likely benefits of APM and the information provided during antenatal care. Obstetricians should consider the technique as routine prenatal care for nulliparous women so as to reduce the incidence of perineal trauma during vaginal birth.


Assuntos
Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Incontinência Fecal/prevenção & controle , Lacerações/prevenção & controle , Massagem/métodos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Períneo , Resultado da Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Nigéria , Períneo/lesões , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 289(1): 29-34, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23764933

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of membrane stripping at 40-41 weeks of gestation as a means of preventing post-term pregnancy and the need for formal induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: A randomized controlled trial of 134 post-date pregnant women at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, from February to November 2012. The intervention group received membrane stripping while the control group did not receive membrane stripping. RESULTS: The incidence of post-term pregnancy in the membrane stripping group was 16.1% (10/62) versus 39.3% (24/61) in the control group (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.78; P = 0.004; NNT = 4). Membrane stripping reduced the duration of pregnancy by 3 days (P < 0.001). The procedure also significantly reduced the need for 'formal' labor induction [7/62 (11.3%) vs. 23/61 (37.7%); RR 0.30; 95 CI 0.14-0.65; P = 0.002]. However, maternal and neonatal complications were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Membrane stripping reduces the incidence of post-term pregnancy and need for formal induction of labor in post-date pregnant women, without increased maternal or neonatal complications.


Assuntos
Membranas Extraembrionárias , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Gravidez Prolongada/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Nigéria , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...