Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 26(18): 1976-83, 2001 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11547195

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: An analysis of lumbosacral fusions for high-grade spondylolisthesis fusions with reduction and long fusions to the sacrum in ambulatory adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and radiographic results of lumbosacral fusions using bilateral S1 and iliac screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: S1 screws often fail with lumbosacral fusions, whereas L5-S1 pseudarthrosis is common in patients with deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 patients (38 revision, 43 primary) with minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 4.2 years; range, 2.0-7.1 years) underwent L5-S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws (158 screws). Forty-nine of 81 constructs (61%) included an anterior load-sharing/fixation device. Group 1 included isthmic spondylolisthesis (n = 42), whereas Group 2 included long fusions (> or =3 levels) to the sacrum (n = 39). In Group 2, 15 patients (Group 2A) were fused from L1, L2, or L3 to the sacrum (3-5 levels, average 3.3 levels) and 24 patients (Group 2B) were fused from the thoracic spine to the sacrum (6-17 levels, average 11.5 levels). Twelve patients had pseudarthrosis at L5-S1. A patient questionnaire was completed. RESULTS: A total of 36 of the 38 revision patients had previous iliac crest harvesting, yet iliac screws were placed in 34 of 36 patients. Overall, 78 of 80 patients had iliac crest harvesting (one not attempted). None had loss of screw fixation or iliac crest fracture after harvesting. Four of the 81 patients (4.9%) had pseudarthrosis at L5-S1 after reconstruction. This included solid fusion in 10 of 12 patients presenting with L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. Fourteen percent of patients experienced some discomfort over the iliac screws; however, only one patient required screw removal. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral iliac screws coupled with bilateral S1 screws provide excellent distal fixation for lumbosacral fusions with a high fusion rate (95.1%) in high-grade spondylolisthesis and long fusions to the sacrum. Previous iliac crest harvesting does not prevent ipsilateral screw placement (34 of 36 patients) or additional iliac harvesting (78 of 80 patients).


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Ílio/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Sacro/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transplante Ósseo , Criança , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Ílio/diagnóstico por imagem , Ílio/transplante , Fixadores Internos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pseudoartrose/etiologia , Pseudoartrose/fisiopatologia , Radiografia , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistese/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 24(13): 1300-9, 1999 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10404571

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-four consecutive patients with flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis (33 with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy, 21 with spinal muscular atrophy) who had undergone surgery for their disorder between 1985 and 1995 were sent questionnaires to evaluate function, self-image, cosmesis, pain, pulmonary status, patient care, quality of life, and satisfaction. Forty-eight patients returned the questionnaires. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient/parent satisfaction and clinical/functional ways in which spinal fusion helped or did not benefit these patients and to assess complications and the ultimate radiographic result. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are only a few reports of results of spinal fusion and segmental instrumentation for flaccid neuromuscular disorders. There are no published reports regarding patient/parent evaluation of the procedure. METHODS: Results of the questionnaire were tallied, graded, and divided into eight categories. The questionnaire was validated by a Cronbach's alpha analysis, a test-retest, and a comparison with questionnaire answers from patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Radiographic data and complications also were accumulated. The follow-up periods after surgery ranged from 2 to 12.6 years (average, 7.8 years). RESULTS: Except for two patients who died within 3 months of surgery, all patients seemed to have benefited from the surgery. Cosmesis, quality of life, and overall satisfaction rated the highest. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that spinal fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation benefits most patients with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy or spinal muscular atrophy with spinal deformities in terms of all categories assessed, even though these diseases have a progressively deteriorating course.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/complicações , Distrofias Musculares/complicações , Sacro/cirurgia , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral , Adolescente , Seguimentos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/cirurgia , Distrofias Musculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Distrofias Musculares/cirurgia , Dor/complicações , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Radiografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/complicações , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fusão Vertebral/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...