Immediate Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless versus Stentless Bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a sutureless valve is an innovative therapy in high-risk elderly patients. The study aim was to compare the early results of AVR using sutureless aortic valves or stentless aortic bioprostheses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 55 patients who underwent AVR with either a sutureless valve (Perceval S; n = 24 or Edwards Intuity; n = 9) or a stentless valve (Sorin Freedom SOLO™; n = 22). RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups, except for NYHA class. Concomitant procedures were performed in 17 patients (51.5%) of the sutureless group and in nine patients (40.9%) of the stentless group (p = 0.44). The aortic cross-clamp time was 55 ± 23 min in the sutureless group and 102 ± 36 min in the stentless group (p <0.0001), while the postoperative peak aortic gradient was 19.5 ± 5.0 mmHg and 29.3 ± 15.4 mmHg for the sutureless group and stentless group, respectively (p = 0.037). The postoperative mean gradient was 9.3 ± 3.4 mmHg for the sutureless group and 15.1 ± 10.5 mmHg for the stentless group (p = 0.06). Blood product transfusion was required less frequently by the sutureless group, but drainage and bleeding was similar in both groups. The intensive care unit and hospital stays were significantly shorter in favor of the sutureless group. One sutureless patient (3.0%) and two stentless patients (9.1%) died in hospital (p = 0.557). CONCLUSIONS: Early results of the present study suggested that surgical AVR with a sutureless valve is associated with a good hemodynamic performance and an improved early outcome.

Gene polymorphisms in patients below 35 years of age who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic bases for novel prothrombotic, inflammatory risk factors may play a role in the early onset of coronary artery disease. METHODS: Twenty-one patients below 35 years of age who underwent coronary bypass grafting between 2002 and 2004 constituted the study group and were compared with 50 healthy, age and sex-matched controls. Gene analysis for genetic polymorphisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme, prothrombin G20210A, tumour necrosis factor-alpha G308A, factor V Leiden and interleukin-6 genes was carried out. RESULTS: The control group was 98% homozygous for the factor V Leiden GG allele and 2% heterozygous for the GA allele. On the other hand, the study group was 76.2% homozygous for the GG allele, and 23.8% heterozygous for the GA allele (P<0.05). Homozygosity for factor V Leiden mutation (AA) was not encountered in either group. With regard to interleukin-6, 70.0% of the control group demonstrated homozygosity for the GG allele and 30.0% showed heterozygosity (GC). The study group was 52.4% homozygous for the GG allele and heterogenicity was similar in this group (28.6% GC). On the other hand, 19.0% of this group demonstrated CC homogenicity (P<0.05). No difference was observed with regard to gene polymorphisms. CONCLUSIONS: Gene polymorphisms with regard to prothrombotic factor V Leiden mutation and inflammatory marker interleukin-6 may play a role in the pathogenesis of early-onset coronary artery stenosis in patients below 35 years of age.