[A Case of Cecum Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis and Invasion in the Superior Mesenteric Vein Treated with Combined SMV Resection and Reconstruction].

The patient was a 77-year-old woman. She visited her family doctor with a complaint of bloody stools, and was pointed out a Type 3 colon cancer in the cecum with a colonoscopy. In addition, an enlarged lymph node(#203)was found on the right side of the superior mesenteric vein(SMV). Laparoscopic surgery was initiated, and when the patient was moved to vascular processing, a firm adhesion of the lymph node(#203)was observed on the right side of the SMV. A small laparotomy was added, and a partial combined resection of the SMV was performed en bloc to complete the ileal resection. Histopathological findings showed T4b(transverse colon)N3M0, pStage Ⅲc, and metastatic lymph node(#203)showed evidence of invasion to the SMV. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered, but lung metastases appeared 4 months and liver metastasis appeared 29 months after surgery. The patient was transferred to a different hospital for best supportive care(BSC)at 34 months after surgery.

Local recurrence of submucosal invasive colorectal cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection revealed by copy number variation.

We report a case in which analysis of copy number variation revealed local recurrence of submucosal invasive colorectal cancer after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). An 86-year-old man with a history of abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for rectal cancer underwent resection with ESD for early-stage sigmoid cancer 5 cm away from the stoma opening. At the same time, ileocecal resection was performed for advanced cecal cancer. Twelve months after ESD, advanced cancer occurred in the area of the ESD lesion. It was unclear if the cancer was a local recurrence after ESD, implantation of cecal cancer, or a new lesion. Copy number variation analysis performed for the three lesions revealed that the new lesion originated from residual tumor cells from ESD and was unlikely to be cecal cancer.

[A Case Report for Peritoneal Recurrences by Laparoscopic Surgery after Colorectal Cancer Resection].

We report a cases report of colorectal cancer who underwent repeated resection for peritoneal recurrences by laparoscopic surgery. In 2013, a 70-year-old woman diagnosed with an ascending colon cancer underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The pathological diagnosis was tub2, pT4aN1M0, Stage Ⅲb. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(uracil and tegafur/Leucovorin)was administered. PET-CT performed at 25 months after the surgery because of CEA elevation. It revealed a peritoneal recurrence in the pouch of Douglas. The following peritoneal recurrences were removed by laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. Chemotherapy(5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab)was administered 11 courses and after that chemotherapy(5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/bevacizumab)was administered 6 courses. PET-CT performed 37 months after the second surgery revealed a peritoneal recurrence near the right ovary in the pouch of Douglas. The following peritoneal recurrences was removed. Chemotherapy(tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil/bevacizumab)was administered 11 courses. The long-term survival has been continued for 7 years and 7 months after first operation. It was considered that laparoscopic surgery for peritoneal recurrence in colorectal cancer is contributed to one of the surgical procedures in selected patients.

[A Case Report of a Giant GIST Markedly Responsive to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Imatinib Mesylate].

Male in his 50s complaining of abdominal pain was referred to our hospital. Abdominal CT scan showed a giant tumor which had diameter of approximately 50 mm in lower rectum. A biopsy specimen was positive for CD34 and c-kit. Based on these findings, it was diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST). We treated the patient with neoadjuvant therapy using imatinib mesylate(IM)to reduce the tumor size and to avoid the extensive surgery. The patient started to take IM at a daily dose of 400 mg. After 3 months, CT and MRI revealed that the tumor size decreased(40% reduction). We performed the robot assisted intersphincteric resection(ISR). Although it has been 28 months since the surgery, there are no obvious signs of recurrence. A patient diagnosed with giant GIST could avoid an extensive surgery due to neoadjuvant therapy with IM.

Significance of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with an oxaliplatin-based regimen after simultaneous curative resection for colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Expansion of the indication for liver resection and new regimens for systemic chemotherapy have improved postoperative outcomes for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, such cases can still have a high recurrence rate, even after curative resection. Therefore, there is a need for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) after liver resection in patients with CRLM. There are few studies of the efficacy of POAC with an oxaliplatin-based regimen after simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer and CRLM with curative intent. The goal of the study was to compare POAC with oxaliplatin-based and fluoropyrimidine regimens using propensity score (PS) matching analysis. METHODS: The subjects were 94 patients who received POAC after simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer and synchronous CRLM, and were enrolled retrospectively. The patients were placed in a L-OHP (+) group (POAC with an oxaliplatin-based regimen, n = 47) and a L-OHP (-) group (POAC with a fluoropyrimidine regimen, n = 47). Recurrence-free (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS), unresectable recurrence-free (URRFS), remnant liver recurrence-free (RLRFS), and extrahepatic recurrence-free (EHRFS) survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Before PS matching, the L-OHP (+) and (-) groups had no significant differences in RFS, CSS, URRFS, RLRFS, and EHRFS. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences in age, preoperative serum CEA (≤ 30.0 ng/mL/ > 30.0 ng/mL), differentiation of primary tumor (differentiated/undifferentiated), T classification (T1-3/T4), number of hepatic lesions and maximum diameter of the hepatic lesion between the L-OHP (+) and (-) groups. After PS matching using these confounders, RFS was significantly better among patients in the L-OHP (+) group compared with the L-OHP (-) group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.96, p = 0.04). In addition, there was a trend towards better RLRFS among patients in the L-OHP (+) group compared with the L-OHP (-) group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.17-1.02, p = 0.055). However, there were no significant differences in CSS, URRFS and EHRFS between the L-OHP (+) and (-) groups. CONCLUSIONS: PS matching analysis demonstrated the efficacy of POAC with an oxaliplatin-based regimen in RFS and RLRFS.

Rectal metastasis from bladder urothelial carcinoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma arises from transitional cells in the urothelial tract. In advanced cases, it can metastasize locally to surrounding organs or distally to organs such as the lungs, bones, or liver. Here we describe a case of rectal metastasis from urothelial carcinoma treated with multiple sessions of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old woman presented to our department with abdominal bloating andobstructed defecation. She had undergone two sessions of TURBT for early urothelial carcinoma in another hospital at 64 and 65 months ago, respectively. Cystoscopy at 3 months after the second TURBT session had indicated disease recurrence, and thus, she had been referred to our hospital for further examination, followed by TURBT for the third time at 59 months ago and for the fourth time at 48 months ago; thereafter, she had been followed up with cystoscopy every 6 months without any recurrence. However, she returned to our hospital, complaining of difficult defecation. Subsequent colonoscopy demonstrated an obstructive tumor in the rectum, which was pathologically diagnosed as metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Laparoscopic examination revealed two small areas of peritoneal dissemination in the pelvis. A sigmoid colostomy was performed without rectal tumor resection. She has been receiving chemotherapy and is still alive 10 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal metastasis is a rare site of metastasis for urothelial carcinomas. It is important to consider the possibility of annular rectal constriction caused by infiltrating or metastasizing urothelial carcinoma when managing patients with urothelial carcinoma and with difficult defecation.