ANGIOGRAPHIC RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE OF MACULAR EDEMA ASSOCIATED WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: To examine angiographic risk factors for the recurrence of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: We consecutively included 51 patients with treatment-naive branch retinal vein occlusion involving the macular area. Each eye initially received 3 monthly ranibizumab injections, with additional injections as necessary. At Month 3, we examined parafoveal vessel diameter indexes (VDI) in all sectors using optical coherence tomography angiography and determined the association with retinal thickness changes (Month 3-Month 5) and the number of ranibizumab injections during 12 months. RESULTS: Parafoveal VDIs in the affected, nasal, and temporal sectors at Month 3 were significantly associated with corresponding parafoveal thickening (P = 0.020, 0.010, and <0.001, respectively), and the parafoveal VDIs in the affected and temporal sectors were significantly associated with future foveal thickening (P = 0.037, and 0.026, respectively). Moreover, the parafoveal VDI in the temporal sector showed a significant association with the total required number of ranibizumab injections (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The parafoveal VDI may adequately represent the degree of congestion associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Particularly, the VDI in the temporal sector may be a good predictor of future retinal thickening in the corresponding parafovea and the fovea and the number of ranibizumab injections.

NONPERFUSION AREA QUANTIFICATION IN BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: A Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

PURPOSE: To precisely quantify retinal nonperfusion areas (NPAs) in branch retinal vein occlusion using widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and examine their association with neovascular complications. METHODS: We enrolled 26 patients with treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion and prospectively examined them for 12 months. After 3 monthly ranibizumab injections to treat macular edema, each patient underwent ultra-widefield (UWF) fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCTA. Ultra-widefield FA was additionally performed at Month 12. For UWF FA, the retinal NPA was measured using the equipment's built-in software. For OCTA, we used panoramic image montaged from 5 single 12 × 12 mm2 images and quantified the retinal NPA using a Gullstrand eye with a grid scale at each patient. Measurements were expressed in terms of actual values and disc area units. RESULTS: The retinal NPAs as measured using single OCTA and panoramic OCTA were significantly associated with that measured using UWF FA (P < 0.001 for both). Retinal neovascularization lesions were observed in 4 (15.4%) of 26 eyes. For patients with accompanying neovascularization, the retinal NPA measured using UWF FA, single OCTA, and panoramic OCTA were 187.9 ± 39.5 mm2 (109.9 ± 21.4 disc area), 34.3 ± 13.7 mm2 (19.9 ± 7.7 disc area), and 106.6 ± 24.5 mm2 (62.4 ± 13.6 disc area), respectively, which were larger than for those without neovascularization (P < 0.001, 0.014, and <0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using widefield OCTA, we could quantify the retinal NPA of eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. These could serve as valid references to assess the risk of neovascular complications.

Factors associated with extremely poor visual outcomes in patients with central retinal vein occlusion.

Here, we examined prognostic factors for extremely poor visual outcomes in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in actual practices. We included 150 consecutive eyes with treatment-naïve acute CRVO from four different facilities and observed them for over 24 months. Macular edema (ME) was treated with one or three monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (1 or 3 + pro re nata). According to the final Snellen visual acuity (VA), we divided the patients into very poor VA (< 20/200) and control (≥ 20/200) groups and examined risk factors for poor final visual outcomes. The baseline Snellen VA was hand motion to 20/13. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections for ME was 5.3 ± 3.7 during the follow-up period. In total, 49 (32.7%) patients exhibited a very poor final VA; this group comprised significantly older patients with a significantly poorer baseline VA (P < 0.01 for both) than the control group. Comorbid internal carotid artery disease and diabetic retinopathy were significantly associated with a poor final VA. In actual clinical practice, visual outcomes may be extremely poor despite ME treatment in certain patients with CRVO, with advanced age, poor baseline VA, and comorbid internal carotid artery disease and diabetic retinopathy being significant risk factors.

Angiographic Risk Features of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Onset as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Purpose: Examine associations between the vasculature at arteriovenous (AV) crossings and the onset of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: We included 78 patients with major BRVO, 35 patients with macular BRVO, and 110 controls without BRVO and determined the vessel positions at AV crossings, where the first- or second-order branches of the retinal veins associate, using a viewing angle of 12 × 12 mm2 in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Results: We reviewed 1349 and 1276 AV crossings in BRVO patients and control subjects, respectively. The proportions of venous overcrossing were 26.5%, 28.6%, and 26.8% at non-causative crossings in BRVO eyes, non-BRVO fellow eyes, and unaffected control eyes, respectively; however, the rate of venous overcrossings at the causative crossings was 45.1%. In OCTA analyses, we divided the branches into macular- or non-macular veins. The rate of venous overcrossing was 52.5% at causative crossings in major BRVO but was 28.6% in macular BRVO. Odds ratios for whether venous overcrossing was a risk factor for BRVO were 3.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-4.88) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.44-2.00) for non-macular veins and macular veins, respectively. The patients with major BRVO caused by venous overcrossing were younger than patients for whom the cause was arterial overcrossing (P < 0.001). The onset of macular BRVO did not differ between crossing patterns at causative crossings (P = 0.60). Conclusions: In eyes with BRVO, venous overcrossing was a common angiographic feature at causative crossings and might be a risk factor for major BRVO onset.

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Treatment Outcomes According to the Retinal Nonperfusion Area, Clinical Subtype, and Crossing Pattern.

This prospective study examined 58 eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) to investigate the effects of the nonperfusion area (NPA), clinical subtype, and crossing pattern on the 2-year outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for the macular edema (ME). All eyes received three initial monthly injections, followed by additional pro re nata (PRN) injections. The final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and ranibizumab injection number were not associated with the macular NPA or total NPA at baseline or month 12, and they showed no significant differences between the clinical subtypes. However, the incidence of neovascular changes was higher in the major BRVO group than in the macular BRVO group (P = 0.030). Twelve and 19 of the 34 eyes with major BRVO exhibited arterial overcrossing and venous overcrossing, respectively. At baseline, the total NPA did not differ according to the crossing pattern, however, the total NPA was significantly larger in the venous overcrossing group at month 12 (P = 0.047). At month 24, the incidence of neovascular changes was higher in the venous overcrossing group (P = 0.030). Following ranibizumab therapy for BRVO-associated ME, the clinical subtype and the arteriovenous crossing pattern may be associated with neovascular changes.

FIXATION STATUS AFTER RESOLUTION OF MACULAR EDEMA ASSOCIATED WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate fixation status of eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and to investigate its association with other clinical parameters. METHODS: This study included 57 consecutive eyes with BRVO after resolution of macular edema. Fixation status was determined by microperimetry. Defect length of the foveal ellipsoid zone band was measured by optical coherence tomography, and retinal perfusion status was assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography. RESULTS: In microperimetry, the mean fixation rate around the gravitational center of all fixation points (defined as the fixation center) was found to be 79.8 ± 18.9%, which was significantly associated with defect length of the foveal ellipsoid zone band (P < 0.001) and distance between the foveal and fixation centers (P = 0.012). The integrity of the ellipsoid zone band at the fixation center was intact in 55 eyes (96.5%). Fixation centers were located within and outside the foveal avascular zone in 33 (57.9%) and 24 (42.1%) eyes, respectively; among the latter eyes, all fixation centers were perfused. Downward deviation of fixation points was rare, despite variations in the occluded area; there was a significant difference in distribution of deviation between eyes with superotemporal and inferotemporal BRVO (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In eyes with BRVO, fixation status was strongly associated with visual acuity, morphologic damage, and retinal perfusion status both in the foveal area and at the fixation center after resolution of macular edema. This information regarding fixation status could facilitate vision management in patients with BRVO.

Morphologic and Functional Retinal Vessel Changes in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the morphology of the retinal vasculature in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT angiography were used to examine macular area and the retinal vasculature at the affected arteriovenous (AV) crossing in 46 patients with BRVO. RESULTS: FA revealed that the affected AV crossing pattern involved arterial overcrossing in 23 eyes (50.0%) and venous overcrossing in 11 eyes (23.9%). However, FA failed to detect the crossing pattern in 10 eyes (21.7%). OCT angiography was significantly more effective for identification of the AV crossing pattern than FA (44 eyes; 95.7%; P = .013). The number of eyes with venous overcrossing detected via OCT angiography (20 eyes, 43.5%) was also higher than that detected via FA (P = .047). OCT angiography revealed that venous narrowing (25.5 ± 21.1 µm) was significantly greater in instances of venous overcrossing than in those of arterial overcrossing (46.4 ± 23.7 µm, P = .005). Macular nonperfusion areas (NPAs) were larger in eyes with venous overcrossing than in those with arterial overcrossing (P = .011 for superficial plexus, P = .049 for deep plexus). The peripheral NPA was significantly larger in eyes with venous overcrossing (65.1 ± 35.3 disc area [DA]) than in those with arterial overcrossing (17.2 ± 24.1 DA; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BRVO characterized by venous overcrossing may be more prevalent than previously reported, and that there is a significant association between NPA size and AV crossing pattern.