Quantification of Oversupply of Chronic Disease Medications among Patients Aged ≥55 Years in Japan.

Medication waste may be caused by medication oversupply; however, the degree of medication oversupply in Japan is unclear. This study aimed to quantify the degree of oversupply of chronic disease medications per patient, the proportion of oversupplied patients, and the excess days and costs of the oversupplied medications in Japan. This retrospective nationwide cohort study using a large insurance claims database from Japan was conducted in patients aged ≥55 years who received one or a combination of the following five classes of medications dispensed in FY 2019: third-generation calcium antagonists, angiotensin 2 receptor blockers, statins, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and biguanides. Medications with the same ingredient having the same specification were treated as the same medication. Medication oversupply was defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) during persistence >1.0. The proportions of oversupplied patients and excessively oversupplied patients with ≥30 excess days/year were approximately 16 and 1-2% for all drug classes, respectively. Three-quarters of the oversupplied patients had fewer excess day (≤14/year), and the median oversupplied medication cost was less than 1000 yen/year for all classes. However, there was a patient with oversupplied medication estimated as 983 excess days per year and a patient with oversupplied medication costs of nearly 90000 yen per year. Using the MPR and excess days as indicators, it is necessary to accelerate estimation of the oversupply per patient, as well as the development of patient intervention strategies and a national system to reduce medication oversupply.

Inventory of real-world data sources in Japan: Annual survey conducted by the Japanese Society for Pharmacoepidemiology Task Force.

PURPOSE: The Database Task Force of the Japan Society for Pharmacoepidemiology began its annual surveys of databases available for clinico and pharmacoepidemiological studies in 2010. In this report, we summarize the characteristics of the databases available in Japan based on the results of our 2021 survey to illustrate the recent developments in the infrastructure for database research in Japan. METHODS: We included 20 major databases from the academia, government, or industry that were accessible to third parties. We used a web-based questionnaire to ask the database providers about their characteristics, such as their organization, data source(s), numbers of individuals enrolled, age distribution, code(s) used, and average follow-up periods. RESULTS: We received responses from all 20 databases approached: eight hospital-based databases, six insurer-based databases, four pharmacy-based databases, and two in the "other" category. Among them, 17 contained information from medical claims, pharmacy claims, and/or Diagnosis Procedure Combination data. Most insurer databases contained health check-up data that could be attached to the claims component. Some hospital-based databases had data from electronic medical records. Most insurer-based databases collected data from the insurers of working-age employees and therefore had limited coverage of older people. Most databases coded their medication data using the Japanese reimbursement codes, and many provided Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification codes. CONCLUSIONS: The number of databases available for clinico and pharmacoepidemiological research and the proportion of the population they cover are increasing in Japan. The differences in their characteristics mean that the appropriate database must be selected for a particular study purpose.

Statin, Ezetimibe, or Fibrate Initiation and Subsequent Use for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases among Japanese Patients Aged ≥55 Years: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

The use of lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) other than statins has rarely been reported in real clinical settings. We aimed to compare the initiation and subsequent use of LMA classes for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Using the national claims database, this retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥55 years who initiated to use statins, ezetimibe, or fibrates between Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014 and 2017 as the first pharmacotherapy for dyslipidemia in Japan. A permissible gap for defining persistence was set as the median days of supply of a class to an individual. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for rates. Cohorts for primary prevention without/with risk and secondary prevention comprised 1307438, 908378, and 503059 initiators for statins; 44116, 34206, and 11373 for ezetimibe; and 124511, 96380, and 27751 for fibrates. The persistence rates declined shortly after the therapy initiation regardless of the classes, which was approximately 50% at 1 year for any class for primary prevention without risk. A notable sex difference in terms of persistence rates was observed only for statins of secondary prevention. The restarting rates were similar between prevention settings: approximately 50-60% for statins and 30-40% for ezetimibe and fibrates 1 year after first discontinuation. For ezetimibe and fibrates, approximately 10% of initiators were added or switched to statins within 1 year of initiation. Collectively, any class tended to be discontinued early and some restarted; however, there were some unique classes. The findings are useful for improvement of dyslipidemia therapy.

[Development of a One-minute Educational Video for Eye-drop Instillation and Changes in Instillation Behavior after Watching the Video].

We created a one-minute video titled "a simple method of eye-drop instillation" (video) for online instillation guidance, to compare the instillation method before and after study participants watch the video and verify the usefulness of watching the video. Moreover, we prepared a document questionnaire to investigate instillation habits and clarify instillation behavior. Study participants were randomly recruited from among students and faculty members via a poster posted at Tokushima Bunri University. The instillation behavior of the study participants was videotaped before and after they watched the video created by the authors. The images were played in a super slow motion, to confirm success or failure in instillation, drop sites, and eye-opening method. Of the 109 participants in the study, the successful instillation rate before and after watching the video was 55.0% and 69.7%, respectively. The use rate of wet wipes for finger disinfection before instillation increased from 0.0% before watching the video to 74.3% after watching the video. After watching the video, the blinking rate after instillation decreased from 95.4 to 45.0%, the rate of pressing the nasolacrimal duct increased from 2.8 to 77.1%, and the rate of wiping the drug solution spilled around the eyes increased from 89.9 to 98.2%. According to the questionnaire, 72.5% of the participants instilled one drop, 22.0% instilled two drops, and 5.5% instilled three drops or more. Watching the video significantly increased the successful instillation rate and improved instillation behavior. Thus, the video created by the authors can be used for online instillation guidance.

Statin persistence and adherence among older initiators: A nationwide cohort study using the national health insurance claims database in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study clarifies the reality of persistence and adherence to statins in older Japanese people who initiated statin use and compares it between primary and secondary prevention cohorts. METHODS: The nationwide study using the national claims database targeted statin initiators aged ≥55 years from FY2014 to FY2017 in Japan. Persistence and adherence to statins were analyzed overall and according to subgroups based on sex, age stratum, and prevention cohorts. Permissible gap of median days that statins were supplied per prescription to an individual was employed. Persistence rates were estimated as Kaplan-Meier estimates. Poor adherence during persistence was evaluated and defined as <0.8 of the proportion of days covered. RESULTS: Of 3 675 949 initiators, approximately 80% initiated statin use with strong variants. The persistence rate at 1 year was 0.61. Poor adherence to statins during persistence was 8.0% in all patients and this value gradually improved with increasing age. Persistence rate and adherence were lower for the primary prevention cohort than for the secondary prevention cohort, and a notable sex difference was observed for the secondary prevention cohort, which was lower in females but was almost never and slightly observed in the primary prevention cohorts without and with high-risk factors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Many statin initiators discontinued statins shortly following statin initiation but adherence while on statin therapy was good. Attentively watching older patients not to discontinue statins and listening to their reasons for discontinuation are required, especially for initiators in primary prevention and females in secondary prevention.

Effect of number of medications and use of potentially inappropriate medications on frailty among early-stage older outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is an urgent concern among an aging population worldwide. However, the relationship between frailty and number and types of medications has not been studied in detail among early-stage older patients, and it is unclear what prescriptions may have a role in preventing frailty. This study aimed to clarify the effects of number of medications and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) on frailty among early-stage older outpatients in Japan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken. Frailty scores and medications of outpatients aged 65-74 years who regularly visited community pharmacies were investigated. Frailty scores were classified as 0 (non-frailty), 1-2 (pre-frailty), and ≥ 3 (frailty). The association between frailty and number of medications was analyzed by age and compared between PIM use and non-use groups. The proportion of patients who used PIMs was also analyzed by frailty score. RESULTS: Of 923 older outpatients, 49 (5.3%) and 318 (34.5%) patients had frailty and pre-frailty scores, respectively. The numbers of medications among patients with pre-frailty and frailty were significantly higher than among those with non-frailty (p <  0.001 for both). A similar increase was shown for PIM use groups aged 69-71 and 72-74 years, but not for the PIM use group aged 65-68 years and all groups without PIM use. An increasing linear trend was observed for the relationship between the proportion of patients who used any PIM, as well as some subcategories of PIMs (such as NSAIDs, benzodiazepines, loop diuretics and antithrombotic drugs) and frailty score. CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary medication use among early-stage older outpatients, especially patients aged ≥69 years who use PIMs and many medications, seems to be associated with frailty, but further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Fracture risk increased by concurrent use of central nervous system agents in older people: Nationwide case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple medication use among older patients is reported to increase fracture risk. But this association is unclear in different subgroups and has not been confirmed by a case-crossover study, which can eliminate measurable and unmeasurable time-invariant confounders. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the fragility fracture risk associated with concurrent use of multiple central nervous system (CNS) agents in older patients using a case-crossover design. METHODS: This study targeted almost all patients aged ≥65 years in Japan who incurred fragility fractures from May 2013 to September 2014, based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB Japan). Conditional logistic regression analysis estimated the risk of fragility fracture associated with the daily number of CNS agents, including subgroup analyses stratified by sex, age, and fracture location. RESULTS: For 446,101 patients, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of fragility fracture increased almost linearly with number of CNS agents; 0, 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and >5: OR reference, 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.23), 1.40 (1.35-1.46), 1.58 (1.49-1.67), 1.89 (1.74-2.05), 1.80 (1.60-2.03), and 1.90 (1.61-2.23; trend p < 0.001), respectively. A similar trend was observed for several subgroups, especially in males and those aged ≥85 years, showing marked linearity. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of fragility fracture associated with the use of multiple CNS agents was robust in older people in Japan.

[Investigation of Successful Eyedrop Instillation Rates and Analysis of Drop Positions Using High-speed Digital Video Recording System].

We investigated the success rates of eyedrop instillation and the distance between the cornea and the dropper tip in 100 volunteers using high-speed digital video recording. Past eyedrop adherence studies assumed that instillation occurred without failure. The ideal distance between the cornea and dropper tip remained unclear, although the general estimate was approximately 2.54 cm (1 inch). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all participating medical institutions, and all volunteers provided written, informed consent. Successful instillation was defined as when 1 drop fell accurately into the eye on the first attempt. The instillation of ≥2 drops or drops delivered outside the eye was considered a failure. The distance between the eye and dropper tip was measured using still images from a paused digital video camera and a digital ruler. Forty percent of the volunteers instilled eyedrops without instructions from ophthalmologists, pharmacists, or other healthcare workers. When the images were analyzed, the success rate of the first instillation was 70.1%. When the eye was arbitrarily divided into 9 sections, most of the drop sites were the iris or the center of the eye. The distance between the dropper tip and cornea was 2.62±1.75 (median 2.20) cm. These results indicate that the generally recommended distance is usually followed. The successful instillation rate based on the distance from the dropper tip to the cornea was 77% at 1.6±0.88 cm and 54.9% at 4.8±1.25 cm.

Central Nervous System Agent Classes and Fragility Fracture Risk among Elderly Japanese Individuals in a Nationwide Case-Crossover Design Study.

Central nervous system (CNS) agents cause fractures among the elderly, but fracture risks of a wide range of CNS agent classes have not been analyzed in a study with the same population and definitions of variables. This study aimed to estimate the degree of fragility fracture risk of a wide range of CNS agent classes in elderly Japanese people. A case-crossover design study, with a case window and three control windows of 3 d each, as well as longer windows up to 15 d, was conducted among opioid non-users who lived without hospitalization for ≥13 months and incurred fragility fractures at ≥65 years of age, using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Conditional logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of CNS agent classes for fragility fractures for groups including and excluding users of pro re nata CNS agents (PRN-CNS agents) and for windows of 3-15 d. Antiepileptic agents had the highest adjusted ORs, 2.4 (95% confidence interval 2.3-2.5) for the group including PRN-CNS agent users (n = 446101). The next-highest classes were anti-dementia agents 1.5 (1.5-1.6), antipsychotics 1.5 (1.4-1.6), anti-Parkinson agents 1.3 (1.2-1.5), and antidepressants 1.1 (1.1-1.2). Similar ORs were found when PRN-CNS agent users were excluded (n = 352828), and slightly higher ORs were found for longer windows, with almost the same order of classes. Elderly individuals who use antiepileptic agents or a combination of antiepileptic agents and CNS agent classes with the next-highest ORs should be carefully monitored.

Fragility Fractures in Older People in Japan Based on the National Health Insurance Claims Database.

Fragility fractures associated with age-related bone loss are of urgent concern worldwide because they reduce QOL and pose financial burdens for health care services. Currently, national data in Japan are limited. This study provides quantitative data for older patients throughout Japan who, although otherwise relatively healthy, sustained fragility fractures and were hospitalized for them. The National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan was accessed to target patients aged 65 years or older who sustained fractures between May 2013 and September 2014 and were not hospitalized for at least 13 months prior to fracture. We investigated whether the first fracture sustained was fragility related at any of four locations (proximal humerus, distal radius, vertebra, or femoral neck) and whether it necessitated hospitalization. Fragility fractures were identified in 490138 of 1188754 patients (41.2%, 345980 patients/year; 1 : 4 male-to-female ratio). Regardless of gender, vertebral fractures were most common across the age cohorts studied (43286 males and 162767 females/year), and femoral neck fractures increased markedly with increased patient age. Approximately 80% of patients with femoral neck fractures were hospitalized (62.3% of males, 71.1% of females) compared with up to 10.4% of patients with other fragility fractures. Data provided in this study can be used as a baseline for evaluating the health economy and establishing health policy in Japan.

Patient Preference for Aggressive Medication Therapies with Potentially Stronger Adverse Drug Reactions Revealed Using a Scenario-based Survey.

Some patients do not inform healthcare professionals of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) because they fear termination of aggressive medication therapies. Preferences for aggressive medication therapies may differ between patients and pharmacists. The goal of this study was to estimate whether pharmacists were able to accurately assess patient preference for aggressive medication therapies with potentially stronger ADRs. A cross-sectional study was conducted of hospitalized patients (35 to 74 years of age) receiving oral medications for a chronic disease or systemic chemotherapy at three hospitals in Japan. We estimated the extent of agreement between patient responses and pharmacist predictions using a scenario-based investigation (1) to examine the choice between an aggressive medication therapy and the standard therapy, and (2) to assess increased life expectancy as a result of aggressive medication therapy. The extent of agreement was estimated using the kappa statistic. Of 113 patients, 43 (38.1%) chose the aggressive medication therapy. Pharmacists correctly predicted the choice of 25 (58.1%) of these patients [kappa 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.50)]. Of 111 patients, 42 (37.8%) expected one additional life expectancy year. However, pharmacists predicted that as many as 36 (85.7%) of these patients would require more years of added life expectancy before choosing an aggressive medication therapy [kappa 0.24 (0.08-0.40)]. Agreement between patients and pharmacists on the choice of aggressive medication therapy was generally poor. Pharmacists should make an effort to identify patients who might prefer more aggressive medication therapies with potentially stronger ADRs in order to minimize ADR risk.

Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy will sometimes conceal their discomfort, but an excessive endurance for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to a poorer prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between ADR endurance and a preference of cancer patients for aggressive treatments. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken of inpatients under 75 years of age receiving injectable systemic chemotherapy or oral chronic medications at hospitals in Japan. Subjects were asked to respond to a validated questionnaire to assess the extent of their ADR endurance and whether they would choose a novel, more aggressive therapy if their life expectancy was estimated at 2 years. RESULTS: Study participants were separated into the chemotherapy group (n = 36) and the non-chemotherapy group (n = 78). In the chemotherapy group, patients who had moderate ADR endurance scores were more likely to choose the new therapy (0-33, 34-67, and 68-100 points: 0.0, 54.5, and 27.3 %; χ (2) test, p = 0.15). Additionally, every patient on long-term chemotherapy (≥3 years) had high ADR endurance scores but did not choose the new, riskier treatment. In the non-chemotherapy group, the proportion of those choosing the new therapy was linearly associated with higher ADR endurance scores (25.9, 38.2, and 64.7 %; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients may prefer aggressive therapies, even when self-estimations of ADR endurance are not very high, especially if they have been receiving chemotherapy for a short period of time. These patients should be observed with great caution.

[A community electronic prescription system connecting physicians, pharmacists, and patients, and utilization of clinical information].

We tested a community electronic prescription system (K-CHOPS/PPISS) that we developed in Kagawa, Japan, which connects the prescribing physicians, pharmacists at community pharmacies, and patients through a community data center server. Physicians can send prescriptions, diagnoses, and laboratory data to the datacenter. Pharmacists in community pharmacies can access their patients' information through the datacenter and can return corrected prescriptions and reports containing guidance and adverse events to the hospital or clinic where the prescription was issued. Patients can then see their dispensed medications on their PCs, cellular phones, and smart phones. Additionally, patients can input medication-taking records, allergy and adverse drug reactions (ADR), any over-the-counter drug and supplements that they take, and their physical condition through the devices. The system enables pharmacists to appropriately advise and monitor ADR based on patient clinical data and enables physicians to accurately know the medications handed to patients and advisories issued by the pharmacists. Further, physicians and pharmacists can see the patients' condition which they entered on their devices if the patients agree. These would be helpful for avoiding ADR. The information accumulated in the data center can be potentially utilized for evaluation of the effectiveness and ADR of medications and for development of innovative medication. Discussion of the pros and cons for such utilization is needed.

Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to verify invariance of latent factors derived from the BMQ (Belief about Medicines Questionnaire) among Japanese adherent and non-adherent groups (adherent to medication and intentionally, unintentionally, and overlapping non-adherent groups) and to estimate mean differences of the latent factors among the groups. SETTING: A Japanese university hospital. METHODS: After administration of a cross-sectional survey, covariance structure analyses of the two-factor model were conducted. Groups that exhibited factorial invariance were identified, and structured mean analyses estimated the differences of the latent means of the factors between groups using the bootstrap method without relying on theoretical assumptions for sampling distributions. Effect size was employed as an indicator of these differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The differences in the latent means of the two factors (the necessity and concerns factors for prescribed medications) across the groups exhibiting factorial invariance, which reflect true differences between them. RESULTS: Factorial invariance was demonstrated only across adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups. Unintentionally non-adherent patients had significantly lower latent means for the necessity factor than adherent patients, with a very close to medium effect size (-0.49; 95% CI -0.84, -0.14; bootstrap method). CONCLUSION: A meaningful comparison of BMQ scale scores can be made between adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups of Japanese patients.

Comparison of individual perceptions of medication costs and benefits between intentional and unintentional medication non-adherence among Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify Japanese patients' perceptions of the costs and benefits of their medications by administering a questionnaire validated in Western patients and to compare the association between the perception levels and non-adherence to medication in the two non-adherent patient types, intentional, and unintentional. METHODS: Japanese patients with chronic diseases were given a questionnaire and interviewed, and the validity and reliability of the scales generated were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyse the association between individual perception levels and non-adherence to the medication regimen. RESULTS: From 151 responses, two kinds of scales were generated following a report of Western patients; the necessity scale showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.79) but the concerns scale did not. Individual levels of perception of the necessity of medications were associated with unintentional non-adherence (the higher the level, the lower the odds ratio 1.0, 0.56, 0.40, and 0.15), while they were not associated with intentional non-adherence. CONCLUSION: Japanese patients' perceptions of the benefits of medications, but not the costs were similar to those of Western patients, and these perceptions were likely to be different between intentionally and unintentionally non-adherent patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to improve non-adherence should be designed according to the non-adherent type.

Changes in attitudes among Japanese patients after Pharmacist Law revision.

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in patients' perception of their medications and their adherence to regimens after enactment of the Japanese Pharmacist Law revision of 1997, which stipulated provision of drug information to patients as one of the principal duties of pharmacists. Setting A university hospital in Japan. METHOD: Comparison of cross sectional analyses between two time periods: shortly after enactment of the Pharmacist Law revision and about a half-decade later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient's knowledge of the medications, anxiety level, individual beliefs regarding taking medications without anxiety, and adherence to the medication regimens. RESULTS: There were 141 and 151 patients who participated during each period, respectively. The proportion of non-adherent patients significantly decreased from 68.8 to 53.6% (P = 0.008). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the features of the intentionally non-adherent patients have changed; they have switched from persons who lack general comprehension about the medications (P = 0.01), ones who place an importance on knowing the side effects (P = 0.04), or who place no value on mutual reliance on their doctors (P = 0.03) into persons who place no value on understanding the purpose of taking their medications (P = 0.04) or who place value on multiple items to take medications without anxiety (P = 0.03), i.e., supposedly people who prefer thinking about their drug therapy from their own point of view based on comprehension of their disease and medications. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid progression of drug information disclosure after enactment of the Pharmacist Law revision has likely resulted in drastic changes in patients' perception of their medications and led to improvements in medication adherence.

[Monitoring sheet covering long-term chemotherapy to predict individual adverse reaction patterns for patients with gynecologic chemotherapy].

Monitoring the adverse reaction patterns specific to individual patients is important to avoid subsequent reactions. Gynecologic cancer chemotherapy is often implemented repeatedly with an altered protocol during prolonged terms. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the efficacy of a worksheet that pharmacists can use to analyze adverse reaction patterns in individual patients with gynecologic chemotherapy. The worksheet which we developed consisted of multiple sections. One section is for necessary drug information for the proper use of antineoplastic agents. Another section is for the following items recorded by the pharmacists: a) patients' basic information such as stage of disease and protocol, b) state of implementation and break of chemotherapy and supportive therapy on calendar, and c) laboratory data and symptoms. We arranged the last item below the calendar and enabled pharmacists to easily assess individual adverse reactions coupled with the treatment course. Reviews of the developed worksheet indicated that the worksheet led to the convenient detection of individual adverse reaction patterns and effective prevention of additional adverse reactions. This monitoring sheet covering long-term chemotherapy which was designed to predict individual adverse reaction patterns will improve the individualization and safety of gynecologic chemotherapy.

[Monitoring the side effects of cancer chemotherapy with patients--participation of patients in cancer therapy and sharing patient information].

The purpose of this study was to assess patient participation in cancer therapy and the sharing of patient information among the medical care team (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and especially patients). We monitored the side effects of cancer chemotherapy with patients, and developed two support tools: One scored the points of subjective symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, etc) by patients, and the other recorded objective symptoms (clinical examination data) by pharmacists. It is most important that they attend each patient at their bedside. At this time, the trial was evaluated by questionnaire survey by inpatients receiving cancer chemotherapy (n=15). As a result, all patients (15/15) responded that this trial was necessary. This trial addressed the following: 1) increased communication between patients and medical staff concerning side effects (14/15), 2) increased interest in side effects (10/15), 3) when a patient tells medical staff about side effects, they act on it (10/15). None of the patients felt inconvenienced by scoring every day (0/15), or anxiety about side effects (0/15). Furthermore, all patients (15/15) responded that "participation of pharmacists in cancer chemotherapy" was necessary. This trial revealed no problems and suggested that patients related to the center of medical care. We should be careful in interpreting results of this small sized trial; however, the following conclusions should be reached: 1) introduction of monitoring side effects of cancer chemotherapy with patients, 2) develop communication among the medical care team.

Impact of prescription-term deregulation with revised medical service fees on drug therapy management.

The proclamation of April 2002 of a Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare ordinance has enabled doctors to prescribe drugs for an outpatient without a limit on the length of prescription terms except for a few drugs. There is a concern that the prescription-term deregulation could cause careless drug therapy management in order to extend the interval between patient hospital visits. The purpose of this study is to make pre- and post-deregulation comparisons of two items, prescription terms and implementation of clinical examination that complied with package-insert precautions, and to discuss the approaches to increase safety. Prescription terms have lengthened progressively. In the pre-regulation period of January to March 2002, the mean prescription term was 19.9 days; in the post-regulation period of July to September 2002, it was 24.9 days; and in July to September 2003, 28.6 days. Even for anti-tumor agents, there were prescriptions over 90 days after deregulation. There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-deregulation compliance ratios for the package-insert precautions in eight drugs of investigated nine. However, one case had a delay in detection of liver dysfunction, which was caused by deviation from the once-a-month testing indicated in the package-insert precautions for prolonged prescription terms. The evidence suggested that the deregulation led to negligent drug therapy management. To assure safe therapy, the following should be addressed: first, sufficient function of a computerized prescriber order entry system and second, creation of a new framework with pharmacists' active involvement such as collaborative therapy management with physicians.