RESUMO
For recurrent cases or residual cases following concomitant chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT), salvage surgery is a frequently used treatment options. A swallowing disorder is one of the major complications of CCRT. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CCRT on swallowing function in patients who underwent salvage total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE), and to evaluate the importance of pharyngeal constriction in patients who underwent TPLE. Between 2008 January and 2014 May, 54 patients were treated with salvage TPLE following CCRT or TPLE at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan and were included in the present study. A total of 14 patients underwent salvage TPLE following CCRT for recurrence or residual tumor (the salvage TPLE group), and 40 patients underwent TPLE as initial treatment (the TPLE group). The pharyngeal constriction score and the post-swallowing oropharyngeal residue rate were evaluated, and inadequate velopharyngeal closure was assessed by videofluorography. The pharyngeal constriction score of the salvage TPLE group was poorer than that of the TPLE group (P<0.05). The bolus residue in the oropharynx was significantly larger in the salvage TPLE group than in the TPLE group (P<0.05). With regards to inadequate velopharyngeal closure, there was no significant difference between the TPLE group and the salvage TPLE group (P>0.99). The results of the present study indicate that the swallowing function of patients who undergo salvage TPLE may be affected by CCRT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To support patients discharged from the hospital after surgery, we launched an "Interdisciplinary Postoperative Support Program" in outpatient clinics for patients who were discharged within 1 month after thoracic esophagectomy and their families. We introduce our program and clarify the patient's physical and psychologic status by analyzing the questionnaire provided from this program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, we conducted the Interdisciplinary Postoperative Support Program every month. Thus, questionnaires regarding physical and psychologic symptoms as well as the meaningfulness of the program were obtained from 59 patients and prospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We obtained valid responses from 48 patients (81.4%). Frequent postoperative difficulties included dysphagia (50%) and decreased physical strength (39.5%). Oral intake decreased to half (55.3%) and one-fourth (25.5%) of that before esophagectomy. Frequent requests made by patients to medical staff included explanations of the postoperative symptoms (97.9%), further information on the treatments of esophageal cancer (93.8%), and the typical postoperative course experienced by other patients (76.6%). A higher percentage of positive comments were obtained regarding the management of symptoms (87.8%) and optimal access to the consultations (78.9%). The incidences of unscheduled outpatient visits were 4.1% and 14.0%, respectively, under conditions with and without this postoperative program (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We found that our program could provide appropriate information with higher levels of satisfaction after thoracic esophagectomy. Further investigations regarding longer periods of physical and psychologic symptoms, as well as the needs of patients and their families should be conducted to augment our program.
