Expanding Access to Oral Preexposure Prophylaxis for People Who Inject Drugs in Bayelsa and Niger States, Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: While oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended for all individuals with substantial risk of acquiring HIV, people who inject drugs (PWID) have not been prioritized for oral PrEP services in most settings. The Meeting Targets and Maintaining Epidemic Control (EpiC) project implemented a comprehensive community-based program to increase access to and uptake of oral PrEP services among PWID in Bayelsa and Niger States, Nigeria. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: EpiC established partnerships with community-based organizations working with the PWID community, identified hotspots (common locations for socialization and drug use), and engaged PWID in tailoring oral PrEP services. The HIV prevention package provided in hotspots and drop-in centers included HIV testing, oral PrEP, postexposure prophylaxis, sexually transmitted infection screening and management, condoms and lubricants, PWID-specific risk reduction counseling, and referrals to other support programs. At drop-in centers, paralegal and psychological services were also provided. Peer outreach workers led outreach efforts. All PWID who tested HIV negative were eligible for oral PrEP screening. National oral PrEP eligibility criteria included: no suspicion of acute HIV infection, absence of proteinuria, and willingness to use oral PrEP as prescribed. We used descriptive analysis of routine programmatic data to illustrate program outcomes. RESULTS: From January 2020 to September 2021, 13,286 HIV tests were completed for PWID. Of these, 12,111 (91.16%) had negative results. Among those testing negative, 8,190 (67.62%) were screened for oral PrEP eligibility, and 2,661 (32.49%) were eligible. A total of 2,659 PWID (100% [312/312] among eligible females; 99.91% [2,347/2,349] among eligible males) initiated oral PrEP. LESSONS LEARNED: Provision of oral PrEP services to PWID in Nigeria is feasible through a peer-led, differentiated, and holistic approach that addresses structural barriers among the PWID community. Greater efforts are needed to understand the needs and barriers to better tailor HIV services to reach females and other subpopulations in this community that are harder to reach.

Evaluation of nine HIV rapid test kits to develop a national HIV testing algorithm in Nigeria.

Background: Non-cold chain-dependent HIV rapid testing has been adopted in many resource-constrained nations as a strategy for reaching out to populations. HIV rapid test kits (RTKs) have the advantage of ease of use, low operational cost and short turnaround times. Before 2005, different RTKs had been used in Nigeria without formal evaluation. Between 2005 and 2007, a study was conducted to formally evaluate a number of RTKs and construct HIV testing algorithms. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess and select HIV RTKs and develop national testing algorithms. Method: Nine RTKs were evaluated using 528 well-characterised plasma samples. These comprised 198 HIV-positive specimens (37.5%) and 330 HIV-negative specimens (62.5%), collected nationally. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for all nine RTKs singly and for serial and parallel combinations of six RTKs; and relative costs were estimated. Results: Six of the nine RTKs met the selection criteria, including minimum sensitivity and specificity (both ≥ 99.0%) requirements. There were no significant differences in sensitivities or specificities of RTKs in the serial and parallel algorithms, but the cost of RTKs in parallel algorithms was twice that in serial algorithms. Consequently, three serial algorithms, comprising four test kits (BundiTM, DetermineTM, Stat-Pak® and Uni-GoldTM) with 100.0% sensitivity and 99.1% - 100.0% specificity, were recommended and adopted as national interim testing algorithms in 2007. Conclusion: This evaluation provides the first evidence for reliable combinations of RTKs for HIV testing in Nigeria. However, these RTKs need further evaluation in the field (Phase II) to re-validate their performance.

Implementing and measuring the level of laboratory service integration in a program setting in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The surge of donor funds to fight HIV&AIDS epidemic inadvertently resulted in the setup of laboratories as parallel structures to rapidly respond to the identified need. However these parallel structures are a threat to the existing fragile laboratory systems. Laboratory service integration is critical to remedy this situation. This paper describes an approach to quantitatively measure and track integration of HIV-related laboratory services into the mainstream laboratory services and highlight some key intervention steps taken, to enhance service integration. METHOD: A quantitative before-and-after study conducted in 122 Family Health International (FHI360) supported health facilities across Nigeria. A minimum service package was identified including management structure; trainings; equipment utilization and maintenance; information, commodity and quality management for laboratory integration. A check list was used to assess facilities at baseline and 3 months follow-up. Level of integration was assessed on an ordinal scale (0 = no integration, 1 = partial integration, 2 = full integration) for each service package. A composite score grading expressed as a percentage of total obtainable score of 14 was defined and used to classify facilities (≤ 80% FULL, 25% to 79% PARTIAL and <25% NO integration). Weaknesses were noted and addressed. RESULTS: We analyzed 9 (7.4%) primary, 104 (85.2%) secondary and 9 (7.4%) tertiary level facilities. There were statistically significant differences in integration levels between baseline and 3 months follow-up period (p<0.01). Baseline median total integration score was 4 (IQR 3 to 5) compared to 7 (IQR 4 to 9) at 3 months follow-up (p = 0.000). Partial and fully integrated laboratory systems were 64 (52.5%) and 0 (0.0%) at baseline, compared to 100 (82.0%) and 3 (2.4%) respectively at 3 months follow-up (p = 0.000). DISCUSSION: This project showcases our novel approach to measure the status of each laboratory on the integration continuum.