Effects of viscosity on power and hand injection of iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media through thin catheters.

BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to achieve adequate vessel opacification during percutaneous coronary interventions when using thin catheters, hand injection, and iso-osmolar contrast media (CM) such as iodixanol (Visipaque™). PURPOSE: To explore these limitations and the possibility to overcome them with iosimenol, a novel CM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three X-ray contrast media with different concentrations were used in this study. A series of in vitro experiments established the relationship between injection pressure and flow rate in angiography catheters under various conditions. The experiments were conducted with power and hand injections and included a double-blind evaluation of user perception. RESULTS: By using hand injection, it was generally not possible to reach a maximum injection pressure exceeding 50 psi. The time within which volunteers were able to complete the injections, the area under the pressure-time curve (AUC), and assessment of ease of injection all were in favor of iosimenol compared with iodixanol, especially when using the 4F thin catheter. Within the pressure ranges tested, the power injections demonstrated that the amount of iodine delivered at a fixed pressure was strongly related to viscosity but unrelated to iodine concentration. CONCLUSION: There are substantial limitations to the amount of iodine that can be delivered through thin catheters by hand injection when iso-osmolar CM with high viscosity is used. The only viable solution, besides increasing the injection pressure, is to use a CM with lower viscosity, since the cost of increasing the concentration, in terms of increased viscosity and consequent reduction in flow, is too high. Iosimenol, an iso-osmolar CM with lower viscosity than iodixanol might therefore be a better alternative when thinner catheters are preferred, especially when the radial artery is used as the access site.

Physicochemical properties of radiographic contrast media, potential nephrotoxicity and prophylaxis.

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) remains a controversial topic. The clinical relevance of changes in laboratory parameters has been challenged; some authors have even suggested that CIN simply reflects natural fluctuations. Other areas of controversy include the pathophysiology of CIN, effectiveness of prophylactic approaches and differences in nephrotoxicity between individual contrast media (CM). The aim of this review is to summarize the current understanding of laboratory findings and explore its relationship to CM toxicity.

Hemodialysis clearance of iosimenol, a novel iso-osmolar radiographic contrast medium.

BACKGROUND: Iodinated contrast media (CM) have molecular and pharmacokinetic properties likely to make them highly dialyzable. Controlled clinical studies allowing for comparisons of hemodialysis clearance between different test substances and in multiple hemodialysis filters are, however, complex and not always practically feasible. A miniaturized in vitro method was therefore developed to evaluate the dialyzability of a new CM. PURPOSE: To evaluate hemodialysis clearance of iosimenol, a novel iso-osmolar contrast medium (CM), in a select variety of hemodialysis filters and in comparison to commercially available CM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different high-flux and one low-flux membrane were used in miniaturized dialyzers to evaluate the in vitro blood clearance of iosimenol. Commercially available CM (iodixanol and iohexol) served as control substances. In vitro dialysis parameters were then used to predict clinical hemodialysis clearances. Residual ratios of endogenous substances (inorganic phosphate, urea nitrogen, creatinine, total bilirubin, and albumin) were used as proof of reliability of the in vitro dialysis system. RESULTS: Dialyzable small endogenous molecules were readily eliminated in all membranes. The removal ratios of iosimenol were generally similar to that of iodixanol in all membranes except the high-flux polysulfone but were consistently lower than that of iohexol. The blood clearance of iosimenol during clinical hemodialysis was predicted as, on average, approximately 85 mL/min with the high-flux membranes and 47 mL/min with the low-flux membrane. CONCLUSION: The dialyzability of iosimenol was evaluated using a newly developed in vitro dialysis system, and iosimenol was readily cleared from blood with all four tested membranes. And it is suggested that the dialysis parameters can predict clinical hemodialysis clearance of CM.