Practice Variation Within a Single Institution in Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess variation in care for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) among surgeons at the same institution, to establish diagnostic and therapeutic variables contributing to this variation, and to determine whether variation in care changed over time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Like other degenerative spinal disorders, DS is prone to practice variation due to the wide array of treatment options. Focusing on a single institution can identify more individualized drivers of practice variation by omitting geographic variability of demographics and socioeconomic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected number of office visits, imaging procedures, injections, electromyography (EMG), and surgical procedures within 1 year after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of surgery. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to compare the variation in practice over time. RESULTS: Patients had a mean 2.5 (±0.6) visits, 1.8 (±0.7) imaging procedures, and 0.16 (±0.09) injections in the first year after diagnosis. Thirty-six percent (1937/5091) of patients had physical therapy in the 3 months after diagnosis. CV was highest for EMG (95%) and lowest for office visits (22%). An additional spinal diagnosis [odds ratio (OR)=3.99, P <0.001], visiting a neurosurgery clinic (OR=1.81, P =0.016), and diagnosis post-2007 (OR=1.21, P =0.010) were independently associated with increased surgery rates. The CVs for all variables decreased after 2007, with the largest decrease seen for EMG (132% vs. 56%). CONCLUSIONS: While there is variation in the management of patients diagnosed with DS between surgeons of a single institution, this variation seems to have gone down in recent years. All practice variables showed diminished variation. The largest variation and subsequent decrease of variation was seen in the use of EMG. Despite the smaller amount of variation, the rate of surgery has gone up since 2007.

Clinical algorithm for preventing missed diagnoses of occult cervical spine instability after acute trauma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Missed or delayed diagnosis of cervical spine instability after acute trauma can have catastrophic consequences for the patient, resulting in severe neurological impairment. Currently, however, there is no consensus on the optimal strategy for diagnosing occult cervical spine instability. Thus, we present a case of occult cervical spine instability and provide a clinical algorithm to aid physicians in diagnosing occult instability of the cervical spine. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old man presented with cervical spine pain and inability to stand following a serious fall from a height of 2 m. No obvious vertebral fracture or dislocation was found at the time on standard lateral X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Subsequently, the initial surgical plan was unilateral open-door laminoplasty (C3-7) with alternative levels of centerpiece mini-plate fixation (C3, 5, and 7). However, the intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopic X-rays revealed significantly increased intervertebral space at C5-6, indicating instability at this level that was previously unrecognized on preoperative imaging. We finally performed lateral mass fixation and fusion at the C5-6 level. Looking back at the preoperative images, we found that the preoperative T2 MRI showed non-obvious high signal intensity at the C5-6 intervertebral disc and posterior interspinous ligament. CONCLUSION: MRI of cervical spine trauma patients should be carefully reviewed to detect disco-ligamentous injury, which will lead to further cervical spine instability. In patients with highly suspected cervical spine instability indicated on MRI, lateral X-ray under traction or after anesthesia and muscle relaxation needs to be performed to avoid missed diagnoses of occult cervical instability.

Primary thoracic giant cell tumor of bone sensitive to steroids.

Spinal giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare benign, but locally aggressive, entity. We report the case of a 40-year-old man diagnosed with GCTB of the thoracic spine. The only symptom upon presentation was progressive back pain with pain radiating to the chest. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the soft tissue mass extended posteriorly into the spinal canal, causing severe spinal cord compression. We initially treated this case with Decadron (Fresenius kabi, Bad Homburg vor der Hohe, Germany) for 1 week. This led to a reduction of tumor size and decompression of the spinal cord. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no prior reports of primary GCTB sensitive to steroid therapy within the existing literature.

Shoulder balance in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Should we fuse to the second thoracic vertebra?

OBJECTIVES: There are many different systems recommending upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) for Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), several of which suggest that all Lenke type 2 AIS patients should be fused to the second thoracic vertebra (T2). However, all previously proposed UIV selecting systems do not accurately predict postoperative shoulder balance. We investigated whether fusing to T2 could prevent postoperative shoulder imbalance and identified circumstances under which to fuse up to T2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected all patients with typical Lenke type 2 AIS who received surgery by one spine surgeon in our hospital from 2010 to 2014. Lateral shoulder balance was assessed utilizing radiographic shoulder height difference (RSH), coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicle-rib intersection difference (CRID), and clavicle angle (CA). Medial shoulder balance was assessed by T1 tilt angle and first rib angle (FRA). Lateral shoulders were considered to be level if the absolute value of RSH was less than 10 millimeters. All patients were divided into two groups as follows: 1) T2 group: UIV of T2 (n=49); and 2) below-T2 group: UIV of T3 (n=24) or T4 (n=6). Patients were assessed before surgery and at final follow-up with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. RESULTS: Seventy-nine typical Lenke type 2 AIS patients were identified. Preoperative CHD and CA were significantly associated with postoperative lateral shoulder imbalance (both p=0.045), whereas the UIV level was not significantly associated with it. Both fusing to T2 and to below T2 could improve RSH (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Fusing to T2 slightly worsened CHD, CRID, and CA at last follow-up (all p<0.001), while fusing to below T2 improved these lateral shoulder balance parameters (p=0.042, p<0.001, and p=0.007, respectively). For medial shoulder balance, fusing to below T2 worsened T1 tilt angle and FRA at last follow-up (p=0.025 and p<0.001, respectively), while fusing to T2 effectively kept these medial shoulder parameters in balance. In addition, for patients with an elevated left border of T1, the T2 group had worse preoperative T1 tilt angle but gained better postoperative T1 tilt angle than the below-T2 group (p<0.001 and p=0.040, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preoperative lateral shoulder balance, more so than the UIV level, can strongly influence postoperative lateral shoulder balance. Fusing to T2 can only effectively improve medial shoulder balance, not lateral shoulder balance (CHD, CRID, and CA). Moreover, a positive T1 tilt angle is an indicator for fusing to T2 to improve medial shoulder balance.