Social and cognitive factors influencing commercial chicken farmers' antimicrobial usage in Bangladesh.

Adapting the Social Cognitive Theory framework, we conducted a cross-sectional study on 137 commercial chicken farms in Bangladesh to investigate factors influencing the behaviour of farmers towards the application of antimicrobials to their birds. Almost all farmers used antimicrobials to treat poultry diseases, while 38.6% also were using them to promote healthy growth of chickens and 10.2% to increase egg production or improve meat quality. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), we identified that inappropriate usage of antimicrobials (behaviour) was strongly driven by farmers' short-term goals to maintain the health of their chickens in a production cycle (ß = 0.813, p = 0.029), rather than long-term concerns. Farmers' perception about their ability to control antimicrobial administration based on their skills and opportunities (self-efficacy) marginally influenced the short-term goals of antimicrobial usage (ß = 0.301, p = 0.073). The results of this study can be used to develop targeted education programs for farmers, to reduce the application of antimicrobials in their poultry flocks.

Association between farm biosecurity practices and antimicrobial usage on commercial chicken farms in Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Commercial broiler and layer farming represents an important livestock industry in Bangladesh. Adequate biosecurity practices are considered to be an effective method to prevent infectious disease occurrence on commercial poultry farms, but antimicrobials are also frequently administered to reduce disease risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study on 57 commercial layer and 83 broiler farms in eight subdistricts of the Chattogram district in Bangladesh to investigate the relationship between implemented biosecurity practices and the use of antimicrobials on these farms. We used a causal diagram framework to inform multi-level mixed effects logistic regression models to explore the total and direct effects of biosecurity practices implemented on commercial farms on prophylactic versus therapeutic antimicrobial usage on these farms. Overall, inadequate biosecurity was more common on broiler compared to layer farms and on farms rearing smaller flock sizes. For example, separation of sick from healthy birds was more common on layer farms (85.2 %, 46/54) compared to broiler farms (38.6 %, 32/83) (p = 0.001). Prophylactic administration (compared to therapeutic use) of antimicrobials was less common on farms that were separating sick birds from the healthy birds (total and direct effect OR = 0.1, 95 % CI: 0.1-0.6, p = 0.006) and less common on farms that used a poorer quality source of water for drinking, cooling, cleaning, and washing (total and direct effect OR = 0.3, 95 % CI: 0.1-0.9, p = 0.036). In contrast, farmers that used washing facilities (versus non-usage of washing facilities) were more likely to administer antimicrobials prophylactically (total and direct effect OR = 3.9, 95 % CI: 1.3-11.3, p = 0.012). The null model ICC indicated significant clustering at the subdistrict level (ICC = 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.04-0.60, p = 0.013), but the ICC was reduced after including flock size and farm type, and the biosecurity practices as fixed effects (ICC = 0.14, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.59, p = 0.0661). Overall, our study highlighted that a large proportion of commercial chicken farmers mediated poor biosecurity practices by prophylactic application of antimicrobials. The results of our research can be used to inform awareness programs for commercial poultry farmers emphasizing the importance of improving biosecurity rather than using antimicrobials to reduce the risk of poultry disease occurrence.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Antimicrobial Usage on Commercial Broiler and Layer Chicken Farms in Bangladesh.

Commercial poultry production is growing rapidly in Bangladesh to address the increasing demand for poultry meat and eggs. Challenges faced by producers include the occurrence of poultry diseases, which are usually treated or controlled by antimicrobials. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 57 commercial layer and 83 broiler farms in eight subdistricts of the Chattogram district, Bangladesh, to assess antimicrobial usage in relation to clinical signs observed in chicken flocks on these farms. Of the 140 commercial chicken farms, 137 (97.9%) used antimicrobials and 24 different antimicrobial agents were administered. On layer farms, the most commonly used antimicrobials were ciprofloxacin (37.0% of farms, 20/54), amoxicillin (33.3%, 18/54), and tiamulin (31.5%, 17/54), while on broiler farms, colistin (56.6%, 47/83), doxycycline (50.6%, 42/83), and neomycin (38.6%, 32/83) were most commonly administered. Only 15.3% (21/137) of farmers used antimicrobials exclusively for therapeutic purposes, while 84.7% (116/137) of farmers used them prophylactically, administering them either for prophylactic purposes only (22.6% of farmers, 31/137) or in combination with therapeutic purposes (62.1% of farmers, 85/137). About 83.3% (45/54) of layer farmers were selling eggs while antimicrobials were being administered compared to 36.1% (30/83) of the broiler farmers selling broiler chickens while administering antimicrobials. Overall, 75.2% (103/137) of farmers reported clinical signs for which they administered antimicrobials, while 24.8% (34/137) of farmers reported no clinical signs but still administered antimicrobials. Respiratory signs (71.8% of farms with clinical signs, 74/103) were most commonly reported, followed by enteric signs (32.0%, 33/103) and increased mortality (16.5%, 17/103). About 37.2% (51/137) of farmers bought antimicrobials exclusively from feed and chick traders, followed by veterinary medical stores (35.0%, 48/137). Purchasing antimicrobials from feed and chick traders was more common among broiler than layer farmers. It is recommended that commercial poultry farmers should keep records of antimicrobials used with dosage and duration of administration along with indication of use. This would allow farmers and veterinarians to review if antimicrobial usage had the desired effects and to evaluate the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents under an antimicrobial stewardship approach.

Assessment of hygienic conditions of live bird markets on avian influenza in Chittagong metro, Bangladesh.

Live Bird Markets (LBMs) in Asian countries are considered as hubs for the spread and maintenance of different infectious diseases. In Bangladesh, LBMs are the major source of live and dressed poultry to consumers and until now only a few studies have been conducted targeting infectious agent status such as avian influenza virus (AIV) prevalence of LBMs in Bangladesh. Therefore, a cross sectional study was conducted using all 40 LBMs within the Chittagong Metropolitan Area (CMA) of Bangladesh targeting demographic information and hygienic status of LBMs in concurrence with AIV prevalence and its subtype distribution, as well as the associated risk factors for AIV. Pooled environmental swab samples were collected from 2 to 9 different sites per stall, with epidemiological data being obtained from a total of 290 stalls across 40 LBMs. The samples were evaluated by Real Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction. The prevalence of AIV was 40% (95% CI: 20-60%; N=40) at a LBM level followed by 20.3% (CI: 10-30%, N=290) at a stall level. Specifically, the prevalence of H5, H7 and H9 subtypes at stall level were 2.8% (95% CI: 1-5%), 0% (CI: 0-1.3%) and 3.1% (CI: 1-6%), respectively. Generalized Estimating Equation model identified that the type of species sold (OR=2.5: Chicken and non-duck species versus Duck with other species), bird holding areas (OR=1.9: Cage versus Floor) and Hygienic score (OR=3.1: Score 3 or more versus score less than 3) as potential risk factors for the detection of AIV at stall level. These results suggest that housing chickens and ducks together in the stalls, birds kept on floors, and lack of adequate hygienic measures of the stall were the crucial factors for spreading AIV. This research outcome could be used to develop a proof-based program concerning environmental sanitation along with development of an effective surveillance system to reduce the AIV transmission through LBMs in Bangladesh.