Comparing the extent of breast cancer tumors through contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs B-mode, opposed with pathology: evergreen study.

BACKGROUND: To prove the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in determining the extent of resection, more evidence about B-mode and CEUS as opposed to pathology is required. We compared maximum tumor width measured on B-mode/CEUS images with that determined pathologically. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 152 operable breast cancer patients who had undergone both B-mode and CEUS were analyzed. Maximum tumor width on B-mode and CEUS, and on the postoperative pathological examination (P), was measured by the participating investigators. In addition, maximum width was assessed in B-mode and CEUS image sets by independent reviewers blinded to all patient information. We analyzed differences in maximum width between CEUS, B-mode and P. RESULTS: The mean widths as measured by the participating investigators were 15 ± 7 mm (B-mode), 19 ± 8 mm (CEUS), and 17 ± 9 mm (P). The difference subtracted P from B-mode was - 3 ± 7 mm (p < 0.0001), and that from CEUS was 1 ± 6 mm (p = 0.0163). The mean widths as measured by the independent reviewers were 16 ± 7 mm (B-mode) and 18 ± 7 mm (CEUS). The difference subtracted P from B-mode was - 2 ± 8 mm (p = 0.0114), while that from CEUS was 1 ± 7 mm (p = 0.1921). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum lesion width measurement showed a tendency to increase in the order of B-mode, to P and CEUS. The difference in measurement between P and B-mode was significant, but there was no significant between CEUS and P. These results provide additional information of tendency patterns in measuring the maximum lesion width through enhancement on CEUS.

Utility of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis: Comparison of liver fibrosis indices.

AIM: To clarify the diagnostic impact of liver fibrosis except for cirrhosis identified using shear wave elastography (SWE) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, and to compare the performance in diagnosing liver fibrosis among SWE and liver fibrosis indices. METHODS: A total of 55 CHC patients who underwent liver biopsy were analyzed. The diagnostic performance for identifying significant liver fibrosis (F2-F3) for SWE, FIB-4 index, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Forns' index was assessed using receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The median SWE elasticity value, FIB-4 index, APRI and Forns' index in the F0-F1 and F2-F3 groups were 6.3 kPa and 13.1 kPa; 1.52 and 4.45; 0.41 and 1.43; and 7.69 and 8.85, respectively (P < 0.001 for all four methods). Multivariate analysis showed that SWE was independently associated with the presence of significant liver fibrosis (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-4.28; P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for SWE in diagnosing significant liver fibrosis was 0.94, indicating high diagnostic value, compared with 0.86, 0.88 and 0.83, for the FIB-4 index, APRI and Forns' index, respectively, which corresponds to moderate diagnostic value. The accuracy of SWE, FIB-4 index, APRI and Forns' index for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis was 90.9%, 76.4%, 74.5% and 67.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SWE has excellent ability for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis in CHC even when patients with cirrhosis are excluded. The diagnostic performance of SWE is superior to that of three liver fibrosis indices.